Suppr超能文献

埃及伊蚊(双翅目:蚊科)对驱避剂行为反应的野外试验与实验室试验比较

Comparison of Field and Laboratory-Based Tests for Behavioral Response of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) to Repellents.

作者信息

Sathantriphop Sunaiyana, Kongmee Monthathip, Tainchum Krajana, Suwansirisilp Kornwika, Sanguanpong Unchalee, Bangs Michael J, Chareonviriyaphap Theeraphap

机构信息

Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.

Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Kasetsart University, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand.

出版信息

J Econ Entomol. 2015 Dec;108(6):2770-8. doi: 10.1093/jee/tov243. Epub 2015 Aug 12.

Abstract

The repellent and irritant effects of three essential oils-clove, hairy basil, and sweet basil-were compared using an excito-repellency test system against an insecticide-resistant strain of Aedes aegypti (L.) females from Pu Teuy, Kanchanaburi Province. DEET was used as the comparison standard compound. Tests were conducted under field and controlled laboratory conditions. The most marked repellent effect (spatial noncontact assay) among the three test essential oils was exhibited by sweet basil, Ocimum basilicum L. (53.8% escaped mosquitoes in 30-min exposure period) under laboratory conditions while hairy basil, Ocimum americanum L. and clove, Syzygium aromaticum (L.) Merill et. L.M. Perry from laboratory tests and sweet basil from field tests were the least effective as repellents (0-14%). In contrast, the contact assays measuring combined irritancy (excitation) and repellency effects found the best contact irritant response to hairy basil and DEET in field tests, whereas all others in laboratory and field were relatively ineffective in stimulating mosquitoes to move out the test chambers (0-5.5%). All three essential oils demonstrated significant differences in behavioral responses between field and laboratory conditions, whereas there was no significant difference in contact and noncontact assays for DEET between the two test conditions (P > 0.05).

摘要

使用兴奋驱避测试系统,针对来自北碧府普特伊的抗杀虫剂品系埃及伊蚊(L.)雌性蚊子,比较了三种精油——丁香、毛罗勒和甜罗勒——的驱避和刺激效果。避蚊胺用作比较标准化合物。测试在野外和可控实验室条件下进行。在实验室条件下,三种测试精油中,甜罗勒(Ocimum basilicum L.)表现出最显著的驱避效果(空间非接触试验)(在30分钟暴露期内53.8%的蚊子逃脱),而毛罗勒(Ocimum americanum L.)、丁香(Syzygium aromaticum (L.) Merill et. L.M. Perry)在实验室测试中的驱避效果最差,甜罗勒在野外测试中的驱避效果最差(0 - 14%)。相比之下,测量综合刺激(兴奋)和驱避效果的接触试验发现,在野外测试中,毛罗勒和避蚊胺对接触刺激的反应最佳,而在实验室和野外的所有其他测试中,在刺激蚊子移出测试室方面相对无效(0 - 5.5%)。所有三种精油在野外和实验室条件下的行为反应均表现出显著差异,而两种测试条件下避蚊胺的接触和非接触试验均无显著差异(P > 0.05)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验