Licciardi S, Herve J P, Darriet F, Hougard J-M, Corbel V
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier, France.
Med Vet Entomol. 2006 Sep;20(3):288-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2006.00630.x.
The knock-down, mortality and 'irritancy' effects of three synthetic repellents (DEET, IR3535 and KBR 3023) on Aedes aegypti (L) (Diptera: Culicidae) were evaluated in the laboratory in the absence of animal bait. Filter paper tests were carried out to assess the knock-down effect (KDt(50) and KDt(95)) and mortality (LC(50) and LC(95)) induced by each repellent. 'Irritancy' tests were carried out to compare the flight response (time to first take-off, or FT) to increasing concentrations of repellents (2-7%) and at five distances from the treated surface (0-40 mm). DEET had an insecticidal effect (KDt(50) = 9.7 min at 7%; CL(50)= 1165 mg/m(2)), whereas IR3535 and KBR 3023 did not. Relative to an untreated control, IR3535 was an irritant (relative irritancy or RI > 1) at doses of 5% and 7% (RI = 17.7 and 9.9, respectively), whereas DEET was an irritant at lower concentrations (RI = 12.3 at 2% DEET). KBR 3023 was the weakest irritant over the same range of concentrations (RI(max) = 3.6 at 6%). DEET was more of an irritant (RI(20) = 9.4) than IR3535 (RI(20) = 2.9) over a range of distances (0-20 mm), and KBR 3023 was not an irritant unless mosquitoes made contact with the treated surface. All three repellents had a significant effect on mosquitoes, but DEET exhibited a more complex mode of action than the others due to its insecticidal properties. The repellents do not behave as a single class of compounds with a common mode of action, but most probably affect different physiological systems in insects. The physiological and molecular mechanisms of repellents, especially DEET, should be investigated to ensure a better use of these molecules for skin applications and/or for treating materials against mosquitoes.
在无动物诱饵的实验室条件下,评估了三种合成驱避剂(避蚊胺、IR3535和KBR 3023)对埃及伊蚊(双翅目:蚊科)的击倒、致死及“刺激性”作用。进行滤纸试验以评估每种驱避剂引起的击倒效果(击倒中时KDt(50)和击倒95%个体所需时间KDt(95))和死亡率(致死中浓度LC(50)和致死95%个体所需浓度LC(95))。进行“刺激性”试验以比较在驱避剂浓度增加(2% - 7%)以及距处理表面五个距离(0 - 40毫米)时蚊虫的飞行反应(首次起飞时间,即FT)。避蚊胺具有杀虫作用(7%时KDt(50) = 9.7分钟;CL(50)= 1165毫克/平方米),而IR3535和KBR 3023则没有。相对于未处理的对照,IR3535在5%和7%剂量时为刺激性物质(相对刺激性或RI > 1,分别为RI = 17.7和9.9),而避蚊胺在较低浓度时为刺激性物质(2%避蚊胺时RI = 12.3)。在相同浓度范围内,KBR 3023是最弱的刺激性物质(6%时RI(max) = 3.6)。在一系列距离(0 - 20毫米)范围内,避蚊胺比IR3535更具刺激性(RI(20) = 9.4比RI(20) = 2.9),并且除非蚊虫接触处理表面,KBR 3023不是刺激性物质。所有三种驱避剂对蚊虫均有显著作用,但由于避蚊胺具有杀虫特性,其作用方式比其他两种更为复杂。这些驱避剂并非具有共同作用方式的单一类化合物,而很可能影响昆虫的不同生理系统。应研究驱避剂,尤其是避蚊胺的生理和分子机制,以确保更好地将这些分子用于皮肤应用和/或用于处理防蚊材料。