Issa Nidal, Ohana Gil, Bachar Gil Nissim, Powsner Eldad
World J Surg. 2016 Feb;40(2):291-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3277-0.
A totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach is currently the technique of choice for the laparoscopic repair of bilateral inguinal hernias in our institution. Most other surgeons use two meshes for the TEP repair, one for each side. We prefer a large single mesh when possible since it allows for easier correct placement of the mesh in one stage. We compared our long-term results of both techniques in terms of late complications and recurrence rates.
This study retrospectively evaluated the medical records of 108 patients who underwent bilateral laparoscopic TEP repair in our institution between January 2002 and December 2003. Excluded were patients who had a conversion to a transabdominal preperitoneal or open approach. A total of 73 (67 %) patients fulfilled study entrance criteria and were enrolled: 39 had undergone single mesh repair and 34 had undergone double mesh repair.
There were no significant group differences in demographics, operating time, postoperative morbidity, or hospital stay. Likewise, after a median follow-up of 102 months (range 94–115 months), there were no significant group differences between the single and double mesh groups in persistent pain (5.8 vs 2.5 %, respectively; p = 0.476) and recurrence (7.6 vs 8.8 %, respectively; p = 0.55).
The use of a large single mesh is an effective and safe alternative technique for TEP repair of bilateral inguinal hernias, and is technically easy to perform.
在我们机构,完全腹膜外(TEP)入路目前是腹腔镜修复双侧腹股沟疝的首选技术。大多数其他外科医生在TEP修复中使用两片补片,每侧一片。我们尽可能倾向于使用一大片单一补片,因为这样能在一个步骤中更轻松地正确放置补片。我们比较了这两种技术在晚期并发症和复发率方面的长期结果。
本研究回顾性评估了2002年1月至2003年12月期间在我们机构接受双侧腹腔镜TEP修复的108例患者的病历。排除中转行经腹腹膜前或开放手术的患者。共有73例(67%)患者符合研究入选标准并被纳入:39例行单一补片修复,34例行双补片修复。
两组在人口统计学、手术时间、术后发病率或住院时间方面无显著差异。同样,在中位随访102个月(范围94 - 115个月)后,单一补片组和双补片组在持续性疼痛(分别为5.8%和2.5%;p = 0.476)和复发率(分别为7.6%和8.8%;p = 0.55)方面也无显著差异。
使用一大片单一补片是双侧腹股沟疝TEP修复的一种有效且安全的替代技术,并且在技术上易于操作。