Orchard Faith, Pass Laura, Reynolds Shirley
School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AL, UK.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2016 Jul;44(5):991-8. doi: 10.1007/s10802-015-0092-x.
The extent to which cognitive models of development and maintenance of depression apply to adolescents is largely untested, despite the widespread application of Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) for depressed adolescents. Cognitive models suggest that negative cognitions, including interpretation bias, play a role in etiology and maintenance of depression. Given that cognitive development is incomplete by the teenage years and that CBT is not superior to non-cognitive treatments in the treatment of adolescent depression, it is important to test the underlying model. The primary aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that interpretation biases are exhibited by depressed adolescents. Four groups of adolescents were recruited: clinically-referred depressed (n = 27), clinically-referred non-depressed (n = 24), community with elevated depression symptoms (n = 42) and healthy community (n = 150). Participants completed a 20 item ambiguous scenarios questionnaire. Clinically-referred depressed adolescents made significantly more negative interpretations and rated scenarios as less pleasant than all other groups. The results suggest that this element of the cognitive model of depression is applicable to adolescents. Other aspects of the model should be tested so that cognitive treatment can be modified or adapted if necessary.
尽管认知行为疗法(CBT)在治疗青少年抑郁症方面得到了广泛应用,但抑郁症发展和维持的认知模型在多大程度上适用于青少年,这一点在很大程度上尚未得到检验。认知模型表明,包括解释偏差在内的消极认知在抑郁症的病因和维持中起作用。鉴于青少年时期认知发展并不完整,且在治疗青少年抑郁症方面,CBT并不优于非认知疗法,因此检验其潜在模型很重要。本研究主要目的是检验抑郁症青少年存在解释偏差这一假设。招募了四组青少年:临床转诊的抑郁症患者(n = 27)、临床转诊的非抑郁症患者(n = 24)、抑郁症状加重的社区青少年(n = 42)和健康社区青少年(n = 150)。参与者完成了一份包含20个项目的模糊情景问卷。临床转诊的抑郁症青少年做出的消极解释明显多于其他所有组,并且将情景评价为不那么令人愉快。结果表明,抑郁症认知模型的这一要素适用于青少年。该模型的其他方面也应进行检验,以便在必要时对认知治疗进行修改或调整。