Berna Chantal, Lang Tamara J, Goodwin Guy M, Holmes Emily A
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK.
Pers Individ Dif. 2011 Aug;51(3):349-354. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.005.
The tendency to interpret ambiguous everyday situations in a relatively negative manner (negative interpretation bias) is central to cognitive models of depression. Limited tools are available to measure this bias, either experimentally or in the clinic. This study aimed to develop a pragmatic interpretation bias measure using an ambiguous scenarios test relevant to depressed mood (the AST-D). In Study 1, after a pilot phase (N = 53), the AST-D was presented via a web-based survey (N = 208). Participants imagined and rated each AST-D ambiguous scenario. As predicted, higher dysphoric mood was associated with lower pleasantness ratings (more negative bias), independent of mental imagery measures. In Study 2, self-report ratings were compared with objective ratings of participants' imagined outcomes of the ambiguous scenarios (N = 41). Data were collected in the experimental context of a functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging scanner. Consistent with subjective bias scores, independent judges rated more sentences as negatively valenced for the high versus low dysphoric group. Overall, results suggest the potential utility of the AST-D in assessing interpretation bias associated with depressed mood.
以相对消极的方式解释日常模糊情境的倾向(消极解释偏差)是抑郁症认知模型的核心。无论是在实验中还是在临床中,用于测量这种偏差的工具都很有限。本研究旨在使用与抑郁情绪相关的模糊情境测试(AST-D)开发一种实用的解释偏差测量方法。在研究1中,经过一个试点阶段(N = 53)后,通过基于网络的调查呈现AST-D(N = 208)。参与者想象并对每个AST-D模糊情境进行评分。正如预测的那样,更高的烦躁情绪与更低的愉悦度评分(更消极的偏差)相关,与心理意象测量无关。在研究2中,将自我报告评分与参与者对模糊情境想象结果的客观评分进行比较(N = 41)。数据是在功能磁共振成像扫描仪的实验环境中收集的。与主观偏差分数一致,独立评判员对烦躁程度高的组与低的组的更多句子评定为负价。总体而言,结果表明AST-D在评估与抑郁情绪相关的解释偏差方面具有潜在效用。