Computed tomography in the diagnosis of traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta.

Over a 26-month period, 25 patients admitted to the Trauma Unit at UCSD Medical Center following blunt trauma were investigated for suspected traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta by computed tomography (CT) of the chest. A retrospective review of these patients was performed. Twenty-one (84%) also had CT of other body areas, most commonly the head or abdomen. Nine of the 25 patients subsequently had aortography; in 15 patients the CT findings were felt at the time to exclude rupture, and one patient was not investigated further because of severe head injuries. In general, if CT failed to show a mediastinal haematoma, aortography was not performed. However, five patients with CT evidence of a haematoma, including two with vertebral fractures, were not investigated by aortography. Two of the 25 patients (8%) had angiographically proven aortic ruptures; in both CT had shown not only a haematoma but also an abnormal outline of the aorta on contrast-enhanced scans. The haematoma was large in one patient and small in the other. Although 10 of the 25 patients had unenhanced scans, no case of aortic rupture is known to have been missed. During the same study period, 47 patients were investigated for suspected aortic rupture solely by aortography. Four patients (8% of this group) had aortic rupture, and two had subclavian or innominate artery ruptures. Only a minority (approximately one-quarter) also had CT of the head or abdomen. The role of CT in the diagnosis of traumatic rupture of the aorta is critically assessed in the light of our experience and a review of the literature.