Department of Computer Science, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Rua Passo da Pátria 156, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Department of Internal Medicine and Endocrine Unit, Medical School and Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rua Rodolpho Paulo Rocco, 255 - Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016 Jan;123:109-28. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.09.017. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
The deposits of fat on the surroundings of the heart are correlated to several health risk factors such as atherosclerosis, carotid stiffness, coronary artery calcification, atrial fibrillation and many others. These deposits vary unrelated to obesity, which reinforces its direct segmentation for further quantification. However, manual segmentation of these fats has not been widely deployed in clinical practice due to the required human workload and consequential high cost of physicians and technicians. In this work, we propose a unified method for an autonomous segmentation and quantification of two types of cardiac fats. The segmented fats are termed epicardial and mediastinal, and stand apart from each other by the pericardium. Much effort was devoted to achieve minimal user intervention. The proposed methodology mainly comprises registration and classification algorithms to perform the desired segmentation. We compare the performance of several classification algorithms on this task, including neural networks, probabilistic models and decision tree algorithms. Experimental results of the proposed methodology have shown that the mean accuracy regarding both epicardial and mediastinal fats is 98.5% (99.5% if the features are normalized), with a mean true positive rate of 98.0%. In average, the Dice similarity index was equal to 97.6%.
心脏周围的脂肪沉积与多种健康风险因素相关,如动脉粥样硬化、颈动脉僵硬、冠状动脉钙化、心房颤动等。这些沉积物与肥胖无关,这加强了对其进行直接分割以进一步量化的必要性。然而,由于需要大量的人力工作以及医生和技术人员的成本相应较高,手动分割这些脂肪在临床实践中尚未得到广泛应用。在这项工作中,我们提出了一种用于自动分割和量化两种类型心脏脂肪的统一方法。分割的脂肪分别称为心外膜脂肪和纵隔脂肪,它们由心包分开。我们付出了很大努力来实现最小的用户干预。所提出的方法主要包括配准和分类算法来执行所需的分割。我们比较了几种分类算法在这项任务上的性能,包括神经网络、概率模型和决策树算法。所提出方法的实验结果表明,心外膜脂肪和纵隔脂肪的平均准确率为 98.5%(如果对特征进行归一化,则为 99.5%),平均真阳性率为 98.0%。平均而言,Dice 相似性指数等于 97.6%。