Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, Italian National Research Council (IBFM-CNR), Cefalù (PA), Italy.
University of Cambridge, Department of Radiology, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, Italian National Research Council (IBFM-CNR), Cefalù (PA), Italy.
Comput Biol Med. 2019 Nov;114:103424. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103424. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
Many studies have shown that epicardial fat is associated with a higher risk of heart diseases. Accurate epicardial adipose tissue quantification is still an open research issue. Considering that manual approaches are generally user-dependent and time-consuming, computer-assisted tools can considerably improve the result repeatability as well as reduce the time required for performing an accurate segmentation. Unfortunately, fully automatic strategies might not always identify the Region of Interest (ROI) correctly. Moreover, they could require user interaction for handling unexpected events. This paper proposes a semi-automatic method for Epicardial Fat Volume (EFV) segmentation and quantification. Unlike supervised Machine Learning approaches, the method does not require any initial training or modeling phase to set up the system. As a further key novelty, the method also yields a subdivision into quartiles of the adipose tissue density. Quartile-based analysis conveys information about fat densities distribution, enabling an in-depth study towards a possible correlation between fat amounts, fat distribution, and heart diseases. Experimental tests were performed on 50 Calcium Score (CaSc) series and 95 Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CorCTA) series. Area-based and distance-based metrics were used to evaluate the segmentation accuracy, by obtaining Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) = 93.74% and Mean Absolute Distance (MAD) = 2.18 for CaSc, as well as DSC = 92.48% and MAD = 2.87 for CorCTA. Moreover, the Pearson and Spearman coefficients were computed for quantifying the correlation between the ground-truth EFV and the corresponding automated measurement, by obtaining 0.9591 and 0.9490 for CaSc, and 0.9513 and 0.9319 for CorCTA, respectively. In conclusion, the proposed EFV quantification and analysis method represents a clinically useable tool assisting the cardiologist to gain insights into a specific clinical scenario and leading towards personalized diagnosis and therapy.
许多研究表明,心外膜脂肪与更高的心脏病风险相关。准确的心外膜脂肪组织定量仍然是一个开放的研究问题。考虑到手动方法通常依赖于用户且耗时,计算机辅助工具可以显著提高结果的可重复性并减少进行准确分割所需的时间。不幸的是,完全自动化的策略并不总是能正确识别感兴趣区域(ROI)。此外,它们可能需要用户交互来处理意外事件。本文提出了一种用于心外膜脂肪体积(EFV)分割和定量的半自动方法。与监督机器学习方法不同,该方法不需要任何初始培训或建模阶段来设置系统。作为进一步的关键新颖性,该方法还可以将脂肪组织密度细分到四分位数。基于四分位数的分析可以提供有关脂肪密度分布的信息,从而可以深入研究脂肪量、脂肪分布与心脏病之间的可能相关性。在 50 个钙评分(CaSc)系列和 95 个冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CorCTA)系列上进行了实验测试。使用基于面积和基于距离的度量来评估分割准确性,在 CaSc 中获得了 Dice 相似性系数(DSC)=93.74%和平均绝对距离(MAD)=2.18,在 CorCTA 中获得了 DSC=92.48%和 MAD=2.87。此外,还计算了 Pearson 和 Spearman 系数,以量化 ground-truth EFV 与相应自动测量之间的相关性,在 CaSc 中获得了 0.9591 和 0.9490,在 CorCTA 中获得了 0.9513 和 0.9319。总之,所提出的 EFV 定量和分析方法代表了一种可用于临床的工具,可帮助心脏病专家深入了解特定的临床情况,并有助于个性化诊断和治疗。