Suppr超能文献

深度学习用于在介入前心电图门控螺旋计算机断层扫描中对心外膜脂肪组织进行机会性、端到端自动评估。

Deep learning for opportunistic, end-to-end automated assessment of epicardial adipose tissue in pre-interventional, ECG-gated spiral computed tomography.

作者信息

Theis Maike, Garajová Laura, Salam Babak, Nowak Sebastian, Block Wolfgang, Attenberger Ulrike I, Kütting Daniel, Luetkens Julian A, Sprinkart Alois M

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Insights Imaging. 2024 Dec 19;15(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01875-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Recently, epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) assessed by CT was identified as an independent mortality predictor in patients with various cardiac diseases. Our goal was to develop a deep learning pipeline for robust automatic EAT assessment in CT.

METHODS

Contrast-enhanced ECG-gated cardiac and thoraco-abdominal spiral CT imaging from 1502 patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was included. Slice selection at aortic valve (AV)-level and EAT segmentation were performed manually as ground truth. For slice extraction, two approaches were compared: A regression model with a 2D convolutional neural network (CNN) and a 3D CNN utilizing reinforcement learning (RL). Performance evaluation was based on mean absolute z-deviation to the manually selected AV-level (Δz). For tissue segmentation, a 2D U-Net was trained on single-slice images at AV-level and compared to the open-source body and organ analysis (BOA) framework using Dice score. Superior methods were selected for end-to-end evaluation, where mean absolute difference (MAD) of EAT area and tissue density were compared. 95% confidence intervals (CI) were assessed for all metrics.

RESULTS

Slice extraction using RL was slightly more precise (Δz: RL 1.8 mm (95% CI: [1.6, 2.0]), 2D CNN 2.0 mm (95% CI: [1.8, 2.3])). For EAT segmentation at AV-level, the 2D U-Net outperformed BOA significantly (Dice score: 2D U-Net 91.3% (95% CI: [90.7, 91.8]), BOA 85.6% (95% CI: [84.7, 86.5])). The end-to-end evaluation revealed high agreement between automatic and manual measurements of EAT (MAD area: 1.1 cm (95% CI: [1.0, 1.3]), MAD density: 2.2 Hounsfield units (95% CI: [2.0, 2.5])).

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a method for robust automatic EAT assessment in spiral CT scans enabling opportunistic evaluation in clinical routine.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Since inflammatory changes in epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) are associated with an increased risk of cardiac diseases, automated evaluation can serve as a basis for developing automated cardiac risk assessment tools, which are essential for efficient, large-scale assessment in opportunistic settings.

KEY POINTS

Deep learning methods for automatic assessment of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) have great potential. A 2-step approach with slice extraction and tissue segmentation enables robust automated evaluation of EAT. End-to-end automation enables large-scale research on the value of EAT for outcome analysis.

摘要

目的

最近,通过CT评估的 epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) 被确定为各种心脏病患者的独立死亡率预测指标。我们的目标是开发一种深度学习管道,用于在CT中对EAT进行可靠的自动评估。

方法

纳入了1502例接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术 (TAVR) 患者的对比增强心电图门控心脏和胸腹螺旋CT成像。在主动脉瓣 (AV) 水平进行切片选择和EAT分割,并手动作为真实数据。对于切片提取,比较了两种方法:一种是使用二维卷积神经网络 (CNN) 的回归模型,另一种是利用强化学习 (RL) 的三维CNN。性能评估基于与手动选择的AV水平的平均绝对z偏差 (Δz)。对于组织分割,在AV水平的单切片图像上训练二维U-Net,并使用Dice分数与开源的身体和器官分析 (BOA) 框架进行比较。选择 superior methods 进行端到端评估,比较EAT面积和组织密度的平均绝对差 (MAD)。对所有指标评估95% 置信区间 (CI)。

结果

使用RL进行切片提取稍微更精确 (Δz:RL为1.8毫米 (95% CI:[1.6, 2.0]),二维CNN为2.0毫米 (95% CI:[1.8, 2.3]))。对于AV水平的EAT分割,二维U-Net明显优于BOA (Dice分数:二维U-Net为91.3% (95% CI:[90.7, 91.8]),BOA为85.6% (95% CI:[84.7, 86.5]))。端到端评估显示EAT的自动测量和手动测量之间高度一致 (MAD面积:1.1平方厘米 (95% CI:[1.0, 1.3]),MAD密度:2.2亨氏单位 (95% CI:[2.0, 2.5]))。

结论

我们提出了一种在螺旋CT扫描中对EAT进行可靠自动评估的方法,能够在临床常规中进行机会性评估。

关键相关性声明

由于 epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) 的炎症变化与心脏病风险增加相关,自动化评估可作为开发自动心脏风险评估工具的基础,这对于机会性环境中的高效大规模评估至关重要。

要点

用于自动评估 epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) 的深度学习方法具有很大潜力。一种包括切片提取和组织分割的两步法能够对EAT进行可靠的自动评估。端到端自动化能够对EAT对结局分析的价值进行大规模研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7412/11659545/c9acfcfb28a2/13244_2024_1875_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验