• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同意与共识——关于获取尸体进行解剖的伦理视角

Consent and consensus-ethical perspectives on obtaining bodies for anatomical dissection.

作者信息

Winkelmann Andreas

机构信息

Institute of Anatomy, Brandenburg Medical School, Neuruppin, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Anat. 2016 Jan;29(1):70-7. doi: 10.1002/ca.22651. Epub 2015 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1002/ca.22651
PMID:26475682
Abstract

Biomedical research and education benefit from the use of human cadavers. These are usually acquired from donors who have willed their body to science during their lifetime. This concept of donation through "informed consent" respects the personal autonomy of the donor and the dignity of the dead body (extended from the dignity of the living person). The concept of informed consent is taken from research on living human subjects regulated in the Helsinki Declaration. This transfer to the domain of anatomical donation, however, has several problems. For example, the dead cannot speak for themselves and the ethical status of the human cadaver remains ambiguous. It is therefore suggested that an element of consensus is added to the concept of consent, a consensus between donors, relatives, anatomists, and the wider community. A consensus can give difficult decisions surrounding body donation and dissection a broader basis and can help bridge the gap between donors and families on the one side and anatomists, researchers and students on the other side. This approach can help to establish relationships of trust with local communities, on which body donation programs depend.

摘要

生物医学研究与教育受益于人体尸体的使用。这些尸体通常来自生前将遗体遗赠给科学事业的捐赠者。这种通过“知情同意”进行捐赠的理念尊重了捐赠者的个人自主权以及尸体的尊严(这种尊严由生者的尊严延伸而来)。知情同意的概念源自《赫尔辛基宣言》所规范的对在世人类受试者的研究。然而,这种概念应用到解剖捐赠领域存在若干问题。例如,死者无法为自己发声,人体尸体的伦理地位仍不明确。因此,有人建议在同意的概念中加入共识的要素,即捐赠者、亲属、解剖学家以及更广泛社区之间的共识。共识能够为围绕遗体捐赠和解剖的艰难决策提供更广泛的基础,并有助于弥合捐赠者及其家人与解剖学家、研究人员和学生之间的差距。这种方法有助于与当地社区建立信任关系,而遗体捐赠项目正是依赖于这种关系。

相似文献

1
Consent and consensus-ethical perspectives on obtaining bodies for anatomical dissection.同意与共识——关于获取尸体进行解剖的伦理视角
Clin Anat. 2016 Jan;29(1):70-7. doi: 10.1002/ca.22651. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
2
Ethical issues surrounding the use of images from donated cadavers in the anatomical sciences.解剖学领域中使用捐赠尸体图像所涉及的伦理问题。
Clin Anat. 2016 Jan;29(1):30-6. doi: 10.1002/ca.22644. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
3
Anatomical human body donation in South Africa: Inconsistencies of informed consent.南非人体解剖捐献:知情同意的不一致性。
Ann Anat. 2024 Aug;255:152292. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2024.152292. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
4
BODIES R US: Ethical Views on the Commercialization of the Dead in Medical Education and Research.《人体交易:医学教育和研究中对死者商业化的伦理观点》。
Anat Sci Educ. 2019 May;12(3):317-325. doi: 10.1002/ase.1809. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
5
Anatomy's use of unclaimed bodies: reasons against continued dependence on an ethically dubious practice.对无人认领尸体的解剖利用:反对继续依赖这种道德上有疑问的做法的理由。
Clin Anat. 2012 Mar;25(2):246-54. doi: 10.1002/ca.21223. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
6
[Donation of bodies to science].[遗体捐献供科学研究]
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2001;185(5):849-56.
7
Ethical Perspectives on Body Donation Following Physician-Assisted Death.医师协助死亡后遗体捐献的伦理视角。
Anat Sci Educ. 2020 Jul;13(4):504-511. doi: 10.1002/ase.1930. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
8
Body donations today and tomorrow: What is best practice and why?遗体捐赠的今昔:何为最佳实践及原因何在?
Clin Anat. 2016 Jan;29(1):11-8. doi: 10.1002/ca.22641. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
9
Anatomists' views on human body dissection and donation: an international survey.解剖学家对人体解剖和捐献的看法:一项国际调查。
Ann Anat. 2014 Dec;196(6):376-86. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
10
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.

引用本文的文献

1
Global Trends in Cadaver Donation and Medical Education Research: Bibliometric Analysis Based on VOSviewer and CiteSpace.尸体捐赠与医学教育研究的全球趋势:基于VOSviewer和CiteSpace的文献计量分析
JMIR Med Educ. 2025 Aug 18;11:e71935. doi: 10.2196/71935.
2
Comparison of cooperative learning through use of an immersive virtual reality anatomy model and a 3D plastic anatomical model.通过使用沉浸式虚拟现实解剖模型和3D塑料解剖模型进行合作学习的比较。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 30;25(1):807. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07397-z.
3
Ethical collection of animal cadavers for veterinary education.
用于兽医教育的动物尸体的伦理收集。
BMC Vet Res. 2025 Feb 24;21(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-04543-z.
4
Body donor programs in Australia and New Zealand: Current status and future opportunities.澳大利亚和新西兰的遗体捐赠项目:现状与未来机遇
Anat Sci Educ. 2025 Mar;18(3):301-328. doi: 10.1002/ase.70004. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
5
The disposability and inclusion of Brown bodies.褐色小体的可弃置性与包含情况。
Am J Biol Anthropol. 2025 Jan;186(1):e25003. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.25003. Epub 2024 Jul 21.
6
Reliable detection of RNA in hippocampus sections of mice by FISH up to a post-mortem delay of 24 h.通过 FISH 技术,即使在死后 24 小时的时间内,也能可靠地检测到小鼠海马体切片中的 RNA。
Histochem Cell Biol. 2024 Jun;161(6):539-547. doi: 10.1007/s00418-024-02277-x. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
7
Receiving a donation call to dissection tables: various aspects of whole-body donation in northern union territory region medical college of India.接到关于解剖台捐赠的电话:印度北方中央直辖区医学院全身捐赠的各个方面。
Anat Cell Biol. 2024 Jun 30;57(2):238-245. doi: 10.5115/acb.23.211. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
8
The bioethics of skeletal anatomy collections from India.印度骨骼解剖标本收藏的伦理问题。
Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 24;15(1):1692. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45738-6.
9
Developing online communication training to request donation for vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA): improving performance to match new US organ donation targets.制定在线沟通培训以请求血管化复合组织移植(VCA)捐赠:提高表现以匹配美国新的器官捐赠目标。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jan 22;24(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05026-9.
10
Willingness toward post-mortem body donation to science at a Mexican university: an exploratory survey.墨西哥某大学对死后向科学捐献遗体意愿的探索性调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Nov 25;24(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00982-1.