Department of Radiology (D.O.B., T.M., S.B.P., M.T.L., K.G., U.H., M.F.).
Cardiac MR PET CT Program (D.O.B., T.M., S.B.P., M.T.L., K.G., U.H., M.F.).
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Aug;11(8):e007657. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.007657.
Background High-risk plaque (HRP) features as detected by coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) predict acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We sought to determine whether coronary CTA-specific definitions of HRP improve discrimination of patients with ACS as compared with definitions from intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Methods and Results In patients with suspected ACS, randomized to coronary CTA in the ROMICAT II (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction/Ischemia Using Computer Assisted Tomography II) trial, we retrospectively performed semiautomated quantitative analysis of HRP (including remodeling index, plaque burden as derived by plaque area, low computed tomography attenuation plaque volume) and degree of luminal stenosis and analyzed the performance of traditional IVUS thresholds to detect ACS. Furthermore, we derived CTA-specific thresholds in patients with ACS to detect culprit lesions and applied those to all patients to calculate the discriminatory ability to detect ACS in comparison to IVUS thresholds. Of 472 patients, 255 patients (56±7.8 years; 63% men) had coronary plaque. In 32 patients (6.8%) with ACS, culprit plaques (n=35) differed from nonculprit plaques (n=172) with significantly greater values for all HRP features except minimal luminal area (significantly lower; all P<0.01). IVUS definitions showed good performance while minimal luminal area (odds ratio: 6.82; P=0.014) and plaque burden (odds ratio: 5.71; P=0.008) were independently associated with ACS but not remodeling index (odds ratio: 0.78; P=0.673). Optimized CTA-specific thresholds for plaque burden (area under the curve: 0.832 versus 0.676) and degree of stenosis (area under the curve: 0.826 versus 0.721) showed significantly higher diagnostic performance for ACS as compared with IVUS-based thresholds (all P<0.05) with borderline significance for minimal luminal area (area under the curve: 0.817 versus 0.742; P=0.066). Conclusions CTA-specific definitions of HRP features may improve the discrimination of patients with ACS as compared with IVUS-based definitions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01084239.
冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术(CTA)检测到的高危斑块(HRP)特征可预测急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)。我们旨在确定与血管内超声(IVUS)相比,CTA 特有的 HRP 定义是否能更好地区分 ACS 患者。
在疑似 ACS 的患者中,我们将 ROMICAT II(使用计算机辅助断层扫描排除心肌梗死/缺血 II)试验随机分配到冠状动脉 CTA 组,我们对 HRP(包括重构指数、斑块面积衍生的斑块负荷、低 CT 衰减斑块体积)和管腔狭窄程度进行半自动化定量分析,并分析传统 IVUS 阈值检测 ACS 的性能。此外,我们在 ACS 患者中得出了 CTA 特有的阈值来检测罪犯病变,并将这些阈值应用于所有患者,以计算与 IVUS 阈值相比检测 ACS 的区分能力。在 472 例患者中,255 例(56±7.8 岁;63%为男性)存在冠状动脉斑块。在 32 例 ACS 患者(6.8%)中,罪犯斑块(n=35)与非罪犯斑块(n=172)有显著差异,所有 HRP 特征值均显著较大,除最小管腔面积(显著较低;所有 P<0.01)外。IVUS 定义显示出良好的性能,而最小管腔面积(比值比:6.82;P=0.014)和斑块负荷(比值比:5.71;P=0.008)与 ACS 独立相关,但与重构指数(比值比:0.78;P=0.673)无关。斑块负荷(曲线下面积:0.832 与 0.676)和狭窄程度(曲线下面积:0.826 与 0.721)的优化 CTA 特定阈值对 ACS 的诊断性能明显高于基于 IVUS 的阈值(所有 P<0.05),最小管腔面积具有边缘显著意义(曲线下面积:0.817 与 0.742;P=0.066)。
与基于 IVUS 的定义相比,CTA 特有的 HRP 特征定义可能会提高 ACS 患者的鉴别能力。
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov。
NCT01084239。