Suppr超能文献

心血管磁共振准确检测疑似非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的阻塞性冠状动脉疾病:CARMENTA 试验的一项亚分析。

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance accurately detects obstructive coronary artery disease in suspected non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: a sub-analysis of the CARMENTA Trial.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Department of Cardiology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2021 Mar 22;23(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12968-021-00723-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is still the reference test in suspected non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), although a substantial number of patients do not have obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Early cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) may be a useful gatekeeper for ICA in this setting. The main objective was to investigate the accuracy of CMR to detect obstructive CAD in NSTEMI.

METHODS

This study is a sub-analysis of a randomized controlled trial investigating whether a non-invasive imaging-first strategy safely reduced the number of ICA compared to routine clinical care in suspected NSTEMI (acute chest pain, non-diagnostic electrocardiogram, high sensitivity troponin T > 14 ng/L), and included 51 patients who underwent CMR prior to ICA. A stepwise approach was used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CMR to detect (1) obstructive CAD (diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by ICA) and (2) an adjudicated final diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). First, in all patients the combination of cine, T2-weighted and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging was evaluated for the presence of abnormalities consistent with a coronary etiology in any sequence. Hereafter and only when the scan was normal or equivocal, adenosine stress-perfusion CMR was added.

RESULTS

Of 51 patients included (63 ± 10 years, 51% male), 34 (67%) had obstructive CAD by ICA. The sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of the first step to diagnose obstructive CAD were 79%, 71% and 77%, respectively. Additional vasodilator stress-perfusion CMR was performed in 19 patients and combined with step one resulted in an overall sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 65% and accuracy of 86%. Of the remaining 17 patients with non-obstructive CAD, 4 (24%) had evidence for a myocardial infarction on LGE, explaining the modest specificity. The sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy to diagnose ACS (n = 43) were 88%, 88% and 88%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CMR accurately detects obstructive CAD and ACS in suspected NSTEMI. Non-obstructive CAD is common with CMR still identifying an infarction in almost one-quarter of patients. CMR should be considered as an early diagnostic approach in suspected NSTEMI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The CARMENTA trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier NCT01559467.

摘要

背景

尽管大量患者不存在阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD),但在疑似非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)中,有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)仍然是参考检测手段。早期心血管磁共振(CMR)可能是该情况下 ICA 的一种有用的门控检测手段。主要目的是研究 CMR 检测 NSTEMI 中阻塞性 CAD 的准确性。

方法

本研究为一项随机对照试验的子分析,该试验旨在探讨在疑似 NSTEMI(急性胸痛、非诊断性心电图、高敏肌钙蛋白 T > 14ng/L)中,与常规临床护理相比,非侵入性影像学优先策略是否能安全减少 ICA 的数量,共纳入 51 例在 ICA 前接受 CMR 检查的患者。采用逐步方法评估 CMR 检测(1)阻塞性 CAD(ICA 直径狭窄≥70%)和(2)经裁决的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)最终诊断的诊断准确性。首先,在所有患者中,评估电影、T2 加权和晚期钆增强(LGE)成像组合是否存在与冠状动脉病因一致的异常。此后,仅当扫描正常或不确定时,才会添加腺苷应激灌注 CMR。

结果

共纳入 51 例患者(63±10 岁,51%为男性),其中 34 例(67%)ICA 显示阻塞性 CAD。第一阶段诊断阻塞性 CAD 的敏感性、特异性和总体准确性分别为 79%、71%和 77%。19 例患者进行了额外的血管扩张剂应激灌注 CMR,与第一步结合使用,总体敏感性为 97%,特异性为 65%,准确性为 86%。在其余 17 例非阻塞性 CAD 患者中,4 例(24%)LGE 显示有心肌梗死,这解释了特异性略低的原因。诊断 ACS(n=43)的敏感性、特异性和总体准确性分别为 88%、88%和 88%。

结论

CMR 可准确检测疑似 NSTEMI 中的阻塞性 CAD 和 ACS。CMR 中常见非阻塞性 CAD,近四分之一的患者仍可检测到梗死。CMR 应考虑作为疑似 NSTEMI 的早期诊断方法。

试验注册

CARMENTA 试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,标识符为 NCT01559467。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb2f/7983380/dc203d5f054d/12968_2021_723_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验