Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Ophthalmology, Betanien Hospital, Skien, Norway.
Ophthalmology. 2016 Jan;123(1):51-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.09.018. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
To compare the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (Avastin; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland) versus ranibizumab (Lucentis; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) after 2 years when using a treat-and-extend protocol.
Multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial with a noninferiority limit of 5 letters.
Patients 50 years of age or older with previously untreated nAMD in 1 eye and best-corrected visual acuity 20/25 to 20/320.
Patients were assigned randomly to receive intravitreal injections with either ranibizumab 0.5 mg or bevacizumab 1.25 mg. Injections were given every 4 weeks until inactive disease was achieved. The treatment interval then was extended by 2 weeks at a time up to a maximum of 12 weeks. In the event of a recurrence, the treatment interval was shortened by 2 weeks at a time.
Mean change in visual acuity at 2 years.
Of a total of 441 randomized patients, 339 patients (79%) completed the 2-year visit. According to per-protocol analysis at 2 years, bevacizumab was equivalent to ranibizumab, with 7.4 and 6.6 letters gained, respectively (95% confidence interval [CI] of mean difference, -4.1 to 2.5; P = 0.634). Intention-to-treat analysis was concordant, with a gain of 7.8 letters for bevacizumab and 7.5 letters for ranibizumab (95% CI of mean difference, -3.2 to 2.7; P = 0.873). The 2-year results did not show any significant difference in mean central retinal thickness, with a decrease of -113 μm for bevacizumab and -122 μm for ranibizumab (95% CI of mean difference, -32 to 15; P = 0.476). There was a statistically significant difference between the drugs regarding the number of treatments given, with 18.2 injections for bevacizumab and 16.0 injections for ranibizumab (95% CI of mean difference, -3.4 to -1.0; P ≤ 0.001). The number of serious adverse events was similar between the groups over the course of the study.
At 2 years, bevacizumab and ranibizumab had an equivalent effect on visual acuity and reduction of central retinal thickness when administered according to a treat-and-extend protocol for nAMD. There was no significant difference in the number of serious adverse events between the treatment groups.
比较贝伐单抗(Avastin;罗氏制药,巴塞尔,瑞士)与雷珠单抗(Lucentis;诺华制药,巴塞尔,瑞士)在采用治疗-延伸方案治疗 2 年后,对新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)的疗效和安全性。
多中心、随机、非劣效性试验,非劣效性界限为 5 个字母。
50 岁及以上、单眼初治 nAMD 且最佳矫正视力为 20/25 至 20/320 的患者。
患者随机分配接受玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗 0.5mg 或贝伐单抗 1.25mg。每 4 周给药一次,直至疾病无活动。然后将治疗间隔延长 2 周,最长可达 12 周。一旦出现复发,每次将治疗间隔缩短 2 周。
治疗 2 年后视力的平均变化。
共 441 名随机患者中,339 名(79%)完成了 2 年访视。根据 2 年时的方案分析,贝伐单抗与雷珠单抗等效,分别增加了 7.4 和 6.6 个字母(95%置信区间[CI]的均数差值,-4.1 至 2.5;P=0.634)。意向治疗分析结果一致,贝伐单抗组和雷珠单抗组的视力分别增加了 7.8 个字母和 7.5 个字母(95%CI 的均数差值,-3.2 至 2.7;P=0.873)。2 年结果显示,平均中央视网膜厚度无显著差异,贝伐单抗组下降 113μm,雷珠单抗组下降 122μm(95%CI 的均数差值,-32 至 15;P=0.476)。两组药物之间在给药次数方面存在统计学显著差异,贝伐单抗组为 18.2 次,雷珠单抗组为 16.0 次(95%CI 的均数差值,-3.4 至-1.0;P≤0.001)。研究过程中两组严重不良事件的数量相似。
在采用治疗-延伸方案治疗 nAMD 时,贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗在视力和中央视网膜厚度的降低方面具有等效效果。两组之间严重不良事件的数量没有显著差异。