• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Geographic Variation in Outcome Benefits of Helicopter Transport for Trauma in the United States: A Retrospective Cohort Study.美国直升机转运创伤患者结局获益的地理差异:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Surg. 2016 Feb;263(2):406-12. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001047.
2
The National Trauma Triage Protocol: can this tool predict which patients with trauma will benefit from helicopter transport?国家创伤分诊协议:该工具能否预测哪些创伤患者将从直升机转运中受益?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Aug;73(2):319-25. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182572bee.
3
Helicopters and injured kids: Improved survival with scene air medical transport in the pediatric trauma population.直升机与受伤儿童:儿科创伤人群通过现场空中医疗转运提高了生存率。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 May;80(5):702-10. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000971.
4
Association between helicopter vs ground emergency medical services and survival for adults with major trauma.直升机与地面紧急医疗服务对创伤成年人存活率的影响关联。
JAMA. 2012 Apr 18;307(15):1602-1610. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.467.
5
Survival of Trauma Victims Transported by Helicopter Who Required Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Within the First Hour of Hospital Arrival.到达医院后第一小时内需要心肺复苏的直升机转运创伤患者的生存率。
South Med J. 2016 Apr;109(4):213-9. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000434.
6
Improved Survival for Rural Trauma Patients Transported by Helicopter to a Verified Trauma Center: A Propensity Score Analysis.直升机转运至确认创伤中心的农村创伤患者的生存率提高:倾向评分分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;25(1):44-53. doi: 10.1111/acem.13307. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
7
Association of direct helicopter versus ground transport and in-hospital mortality in trauma patients: a propensity score analysis.直升机直接转运与地面转运对创伤患者院内死亡率的影响:倾向评分分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;18(11):1208-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01207.x.
8
Helicopters improve survival in seriously injured patients requiring interfacility transfer for definitive care.直升机可提高需要进行院间转运以接受确定性治疗的重伤患者的生存率。
J Trauma. 2011 Feb;70(2):310-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182032b4f.
9
Comparative assessment of in-hospital trauma mortality at a South African trauma center and matched patients treated in the United States.南非一家创伤中心与在美国接受治疗的匹配患者的院内创伤死亡率比较评估。
Surgery. 2017 Sep;162(3):620-627. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.04.024. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
10
It's All About Location, Location, Location: A New Perspective on Trauma Transport.一切都关乎位置,位置,位置:创伤转运的新视角。
Ann Surg. 2016 Feb;263(2):413-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001265.

引用本文的文献

1
Mortality rates in physician staffed ground vs. air ambulance for severe trauma patients: retrospective analysis of the Japanese nationwide trauma registry.配备医师的地面救护车与空中救护车运送严重创伤患者的死亡率:日本全国创伤登记处的回顾性分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 20;15(1):6255. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89489-w.
2
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Relationships between trauma death, disability, and geographic factors: a systematic review.创伤死亡、残疾与地理因素之间的关系:一项系统综述。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2023 Dec;10(4):426-437. doi: 10.15441/ceem.23.009. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
4
The Association Between Congestive Heart Failure and One-Year Mortality After Surgery in Singaporean Adults: A Secondary Retrospective Cohort Study Using Propensity-Score Matching, Propensity Adjustment, and Propensity-Based Weighting.新加坡成年人手术后充血性心力衰竭与一年死亡率之间的关联:一项使用倾向评分匹配、倾向调整和基于倾向加权的二次回顾性队列研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 17;9:858068. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.858068. eCollection 2022.
5
Disparities in Adult and Pediatric Trauma Outcomes: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.成人和儿科创伤结局的差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2020 Sep;44(9):3010-3021. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05591-2.
6
Impact of Trauma System Structure on Injury Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.创伤系统结构对损伤结局的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
World J Surg. 2018 May;42(5):1327-1339. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4292-0.
7
Distance matters: Effect of geographic trauma system resource organization on fatal motor vehicle collisions.距离至关重要:地理创伤系统资源组织对致命机动车碰撞事故的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jul;83(1):111-118. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001508.
8
Outcomes after helicopter versus ground emergency medical services for major trauma--propensity score and instrumental variable analyses: a retrospective nationwide cohort study.直升机与地面紧急医疗服务用于重大创伤后的结局——倾向评分与工具变量分析:一项全国性回顾性队列研究
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Nov 29;24(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0335-z.
9
Helicopters and injured kids: Improved survival with scene air medical transport in the pediatric trauma population.直升机与受伤儿童:儿科创伤人群通过现场空中医疗转运提高了生存率。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 May;80(5):702-10. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000971.
10
Helicopter transport improves survival following injury in the absence of a time-saving advantage.在不存在节省时间优势的情况下,直升机转运可提高受伤后的生存率。
Surgery. 2016 Mar;159(3):947-59. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.09.015. Epub 2015 Oct 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Positive and negative volume-outcome relationships in the geriatric trauma population.老年创伤人群中容量-结局的正性和负性关系。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Apr;149(4):319-26. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4834.
2
Survival benefit of helicopter emergency medical services compared to ground emergency medical services in traumatized patients.直升机紧急医疗服务与地面紧急医疗服务相比对创伤患者的生存益处。
Crit Care. 2013 Jun 21;17(3):R124. doi: 10.1186/cc12796.
3
The association between air ambulance distribution and trauma mortality.空中救护车分布与创伤死亡率之间的关联。
Ann Surg. 2013 Jun;257(6):1147-53. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827ee6b0.
4
Does helicopter transport improve outcomes independently of emergency medical system time?直升机转运是否能独立于紧急医疗体系时间改善预后?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jan;74(1):149-54; discussion 154-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827890cc.
5
A population-based analysis of the discrepancy between potential and realized access to trauma center care.基于人群的潜在和实际创伤中心救治机会差距分析。
Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):160-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827b9649.
6
An evaluation of a proactive geriatric trauma consultation service.老年创伤主动咨询服务评估。
Ann Surg. 2012 Dec;256(6):1098-101. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318270f27a.
7
The National Trauma Triage Protocol: can this tool predict which patients with trauma will benefit from helicopter transport?国家创伤分诊协议:该工具能否预测哪些创伤患者将从直升机转运中受益?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Aug;73(2):319-25. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182572bee.
8
Association between helicopter vs ground emergency medical services and survival for adults with major trauma.直升机与地面紧急医疗服务对创伤成年人存活率的影响关联。
JAMA. 2012 Apr 18;307(15):1602-1610. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.467.
9
Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2011.《伤员现场分类指南:国家现场分类专家小组 2011 年的建议》。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2012 Jan 13;61(RR-1):1-20.
10
Association of direct helicopter versus ground transport and in-hospital mortality in trauma patients: a propensity score analysis.直升机直接转运与地面转运对创伤患者院内死亡率的影响:倾向评分分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;18(11):1208-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01207.x.

美国直升机转运创伤患者结局获益的地理差异:一项回顾性队列研究

Geographic Variation in Outcome Benefits of Helicopter Transport for Trauma in the United States: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Brown Joshua B, Gestring Mark L, Stassen Nicole A, Forsythe Raquel M, Billiar Timothy R, Peitzman Andrew B, Sperry Jason L

机构信息

*Division of General Surgery and Trauma, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA †Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2016 Feb;263(2):406-12. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001047.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001047
PMID:26479214
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4706792/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the effect of US geographic region on outcomes of helicopter transport (HT) for trauma.

BACKGROUND

HT is an integral component of trauma systems. Evidence suggests that HT is associated with improved outcomes; however, no studies examine the impact of geographic variation on outcomes for HT.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing scene HT or ground transport in the National Trauma Databank (2009-2012). Subjects were divided by US census region. HT and ground transport subjects were propensity-score matched based on prehospital physiology and injury severity. Conditional logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of HT on survival and discharge to home in each region. Region-level characteristics were assessed as potential explanatory factors.

RESULTS

A total of 193,629 pairs were matched. HT was associated with increased odds of survival and discharge to home; however, the magnitude of these effects varied significantly across regions (P < 0.01). The South had the greatest survival benefit (odds ratio: 1.44; 95% confidence interval: 1.39-1.49, P < 0.01) and the Northeast had the greatest discharge to home benefit (odds ratio: 1.29; 95% confidence interval: 1.18-1.41, P < 0.01). A subset of region-level characteristics influenced the effect of HT on each outcome, including helicopter utilization, injury severity, trauma center and helicopter distribution, trauma center access, traffic congestion, and urbanicity (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Geographic region impacts the benefits of HT in trauma. Variations in resource allocation partially account for outcome differences. Policy makers should consider regional factors to better assess and allocate resources within trauma systems to optimize the role of HT.

摘要

目的

评估美国地理区域对创伤直升机转运(HT)结局的影响。

背景

HT是创伤系统的一个重要组成部分。有证据表明HT与改善结局相关;然而,尚无研究考察地理差异对HT结局的影响。

方法

对国家创伤数据库(2009 - 2012年)中接受现场HT或地面转运的患者进行回顾性队列研究。受试者按美国人口普查区域划分。基于院前生理状况和损伤严重程度,对HT和地面转运受试者进行倾向得分匹配。采用条件逻辑回归评估HT对各区域生存及出院回家的影响。将区域层面的特征作为潜在解释因素进行评估。

结果

共匹配了193,629对。HT与生存及出院回家的几率增加相关;然而,这些影响在各区域间差异显著(P<0.01)。南部生存获益最大(优势比:1.44;95%置信区间:1.39 - 1.49,P<0.01),东北部出院回家获益最大(优势比:1.29;95%置信区间:1.18 - 1.41,P<0.01)。区域层面特征的一个子集影响了HT对各结局的作用,包括直升机利用率、损伤严重程度、创伤中心及直升机分布、创伤中心可达性、交通拥堵和城市化程度(P<0.05)。

结论

地理区域影响创伤中HT的获益。资源分配的差异部分解释了结局差异。政策制定者应考虑区域因素,以便更好地评估和分配创伤系统内的资源,从而优化HT的作用。