Division of Trauma and General Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Aug;73(2):319-25. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182572bee.
Helicopter transport (HT) is an important component of American trauma care, but prospectively identifying patients that would benefit from this resource remains difficult. The objective of this study was to assess the role of the National Trauma Triage Protocol (NTTP) in selecting patients that would benefit from HT.
Subjects transported by HT or ground transport from the scene of injury in 2007 were identified using the National Trauma Databank version 8. Criteria from the stepwise NTTP available in the data set were collected including physiologic data, anatomic injuries identified by DRG International Classification of Diseases-9th Rev. codes, and age. Subgroups of patients who met specific triage criteria were evaluated using logistic regression to determine if transport modality was an independent predictor of survival after controlling for demographics, injury severity, prehospital time, and presence of other NTTP triage criteria. Standard test characteristics were calculated for each criterion to predict trauma center need (TCN). The performance of triage criteria to predict TCN was compared between the groups using independent receiver operating characteristic area under the curve analysis.
There were 258,387 subjects transported either by helicopter (16%) or by ground (84%). HT subjects were more severely injured (mean [SD], Injury Severity Score, 15.9 [12] vs. 10.2 [10], p < 0.01). Logistic regression identified HT as an independent predictor of survival in subjects with a subset of triage criteria, including penetrating injury, GCS<14, RR<10 or >29 breaths per minute, and age>55 years. Each criterion previously mentioned was significantly more predictive of TCN in the HT group than in the ground transport group (p < 0.01).
Patients who meet certain triage criteria in the field seem to have an independent survival benefit if transported to a trauma center by helicopter. Furthermore, these criteria are highly specific and more reliably predict TCN in the HT group. The specific triage criteria listed previously should be carefully considered when developing policies for scene helicopter use in the trauma setting.
直升机运输(HT)是美国创伤救治的重要组成部分,但前瞻性地确定哪些患者将受益于这一资源仍然很困难。本研究的目的是评估国家创伤分诊协议(NTTP)在选择可能受益于 HT 的患者方面的作用。
使用国家创伤数据库第 8 版,确定 2007 年从损伤现场通过 HT 或地面运输的受试者。收集数据集内 NTTP 的逐步标准,包括生理数据、DRG 国际疾病分类-9 修订版代码识别的解剖损伤以及年龄。使用逻辑回归评估符合特定分诊标准的患者亚组,以确定在控制人口统计学、损伤严重程度、院前时间和其他 NTTP 分诊标准的情况下,运输方式是否是生存的独立预测因素。计算每个标准预测创伤中心需求(TCN)的标准测试特征。使用独立接受者操作特征曲线下面积分析比较两组之间的分诊标准对 TCN 的预测性能。
共有 258387 名受试者通过直升机(16%)或地面(84%)运输。HT 组患者的损伤更严重(平均[标准差],损伤严重程度评分,15.9[12]比 10.2[10],p<0.01)。逻辑回归确定 HT 是符合某些分诊标准的患者的独立生存预测因素,包括穿透伤、GCS<14、RR<10 或>29 次/分钟以及年龄>55 岁。之前提到的每个标准在 HT 组中都比在地面运输组中更能可靠地预测 TCN(p<0.01)。
在现场符合某些分诊标准的患者如果通过直升机转运到创伤中心,似乎有独立的生存获益。此外,这些标准具有很高的特异性,并且在 HT 组中更可靠地预测 TCN。在创伤环境中制定现场直升机使用政策时,应仔细考虑之前列出的特定分诊标准。