Suppr超能文献

向文化多元的研究参与者及死者家属反馈研究结果的考量因素。

Considerations for Returning Research Results to Culturally Diverse Participants and Families of Decedents.

作者信息

Garrison Nanibaa A

机构信息

Assistant Professor in the Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society and in the Departments of Pediatrics and Anthropology at Vanderbilt University. She received her Ph.D. in genetics from Stanford University and completed a postdoctoral fellowship at the Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics. She is Diné from the Navajo Nation.

出版信息

J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Fall;43(3):569-75. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12300.

Abstract

There has been considerable debate on which genomic research results to return to participants and when those results should be returned, but little attention to how those results should be returned, especially to minority and culturally diverse participants. This paper explores the cultural and ethical considerations around returning research results to participants and families of culturally diverse backgrounds, with a special focus on considerations when the research participant is deceased, and raises points for further discussion.

摘要

关于哪些基因组研究结果应反馈给参与者以及何时反馈这些结果,一直存在大量争论,但对于这些结果应如何反馈,尤其是对少数群体和文化背景多样的参与者,却很少有人关注。本文探讨了向文化背景多样的参与者及其家庭反馈研究结果时的文化和伦理考量,特别关注研究参与者去世时的相关考量,并提出了有待进一步讨论的要点。

相似文献

3
The return of results of deceased research participants.
J Law Med Ethics. 2011 Winter;39(4):621-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00629.x.
4
Pediatric research and the return of individual research results.
J Law Med Ethics. 2011 Winter;39(4):593-604. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00626.x.
6
Return of Genetic Research Results to Participants and Families: IRB Perspectives and Roles.
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Fall;43(3):502-13. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12292.
10
The needle in the haystack: international consortia and the return of individual research results.
J Law Med Ethics. 2011 Winter;39(4):631-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00630.x.

引用本文的文献

1
"If relatives inherited the gene, they should inherit the data." Bringing the family into the room where bioethics happens.
New Genet Soc. 2022;41(1):23-46. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2021.2007065. Epub 2021 Dec 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Practical guidance on informed consent for pediatric participants in a biorepository.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Nov;89(11):1471-80. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
2
Exploring pathways to trust: a tribal perspective on data sharing.
Genet Med. 2014 Nov;16(11):820-6. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.47. Epub 2014 May 15.
3
Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Jun 5;94(6):818-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 May 8.
6
Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!
Genet Med. 2013 Nov;15(11):854-9. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.113. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
7
ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Genet Med. 2013 Jul;15(7):565-74. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.73. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
9
Alaska native people's perceptions, understandings, and expectations for research involving biological specimens.
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2012 May 22;71:18642. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v71i0.18642.
10
Offering aggregate results to participants in genomic research: opportunities and challenges.
Genet Med. 2012 Apr;14(4):490-6. doi: 10.1038/gim.2011.62. Epub 2012 Jan 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验