Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey.
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, Turkey.
J Prosthodont. 2017 Jul;26(5):446-454. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12387. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of various surface treatments on the surface structure and shear bond strength (SBS) of different ceramics.
A total of 192 disk-shaped cores were prepared using two all-ceramic systems, of which 168 were submitted to SBS tests, and 24 were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). The ceramics used were IPS Empress e.max (EX) lithium glass-ceramic and Vita In-Ceram Zirconia glass-infiltrated zirconia (ICZ). The specimens were randomly divided into seven groups (n = 12) on the basis of the surface treatment used: control; SB-sandblasting with 50 μm Al O particles; CJ-chairside silica coating with 30 μm SiO particles and silanization (Clearfil Porcelain Bond Activator); HF-etching in 5% hydrofluoric acid and silanization; ER-etching with an Er:YAG laser (10 W); ND-Nd:YAG laser etching (0.8 W); and FS-etching with a femtosecond laser (860 mW). A luting cement (Clearfil Esthetic) was photopolymerized on each treated ceramic disk. After subjecting the specimens to thermocycling (1000 cycles, 5°C to 55°C), SBS tests were performed using a universal testing machine. The data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests using a significance limit of 5%.
Among the EX ceramics, the CJ (29.10 MPa) and HF (26.07 MPa) specimens had statistically higher SBS values. For the ICZ ceramics, the highest value (28.08 MPa) was obtained for the CJ specimens.
Silanization after coating with silica improves the bond strengths of both EX and ICZ specimens, while HF etching is favorable only for the EX specimens.
本研究旨在评估不同表面处理对不同陶瓷的表面结构和剪切结合强度(SBS)的影响。
使用两种全陶瓷系统制备了 192 个圆盘形芯体,其中 168 个进行了 SBS 测试,24 个通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和原子力显微镜(AFM)进行了研究。使用的陶瓷为 IPS Empress e.max(EX)锂玻璃陶瓷和 Vita In-Ceram Zirconia 玻璃渗透氧化锆(ICZ)。根据使用的表面处理方法,将样本随机分为七组(n = 12):对照组;SB-用 50μm Al2O3 颗粒喷砂;CJ-用 30μm SiO2 颗粒进行椅旁硅涂层处理并进行硅烷化(Clearfil Porcelain Bond Activator);HF-用 5%氢氟酸蚀刻并硅烷化;ER-用 Er:YAG 激光(10W)蚀刻;ND-Nd:YAG 激光蚀刻(0.8W);FS-用飞秒激光(860mW)蚀刻。在每个处理后的陶瓷盘上光聚合了一种粘固剂(Clearfil Esthetic)。将样品进行热循环(1000 次,5°C 至 55°C)后,使用万能试验机进行 SBS 测试。使用双因素方差分析和 Tukey 检验对数据进行分析,显著性水平为 5%。
在 EX 陶瓷中,CJ(29.10MPa)和 HF(26.07MPa)样品的 SBS 值具有统计学意义上更高。对于 ICZ 陶瓷,CJ 样品的最高值(28.08MPa)。
硅烷化涂层后进行硅烷化处理可提高 EX 和 ICZ 样品的粘结强度,而 HF 蚀刻仅对 EX 样品有利。