Robertson L S, Kelley A B
Nanlee Research, Branford, Connecticut 06405.
J Trauma. 1989 Mar;29(3):313-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198903000-00006.
Fatal Accident Reporting System (FARS) files for the years 1981-1984 were examined for rollover crash involvement of 15 utility and passenger vehicle make-models for which static stability values (1/2 track width divided by height of center of gravity) were published. The values ranged from highs of 1.57-1.62 for the pre-1979 Ford LTD, the pre-1979 Chevrolet Nova, and the pre-1982 Pontiac Firebird to lows of 1.01-1.07 for the Jeep CJ-5 and CJ-7 and the pre-1978 Ford Bronco. Rollover as the first harmful event and as the most harmful event per 100,000 vehicles registered was strongly predicted by stability. Stability was unrelated to nonrollover crashes. The low-stability vehicles were much more likely to roll over on the road rather than after leaving the road. Other road, driver, and environmental risk factors recorded in the FARS files were not correlated to stability in such a way as to explain the high rollover of low-stability vehicles. Using Federal Highway Administration vehicle mileage estimates, calculations were made of the mileages under various conditions which the vehicles with low stability values would have to have been driven if mileage or hazardous-condition differences rather than stability differences accounted for their substantially higher fatal rollover fatal crash rates. This analysis indicates that fatal rollover rates of low-stability vehicles could not have occurred at reasonable mileage.
对1981 - 1984年致命事故报告系统(FARS)文件进行了审查,以了解15种多功能车和乘用车车型卷入翻车事故的情况,这些车型的静态稳定性值(半履带宽度除以重心高度)已公布。这些值的范围从1979年前的福特 LTD、1979年前的雪佛兰新星和1982年前的庞蒂亚克火鸟的1.57 - 1.62的高位,到吉普CJ - 5和CJ - 7以及1978年前的福特野马的1.01 - 1.07的低位。稳定性强烈预测了翻车作为每10万辆登记车辆中的首个有害事件和最有害事件的情况。稳定性与非翻车事故无关。低稳定性车辆在路上翻车的可能性远高于离开道路后翻车的可能性。FARS文件中记录的其他道路、驾驶员和环境风险因素与稳定性没有关联,无法解释低稳定性车辆的高翻车率。利用联邦公路管理局的车辆里程估计,计算了在各种条件下,如果是里程或危险状况差异而非稳定性差异导致低稳定性值车辆的致命翻车事故率大幅升高,那么这些车辆必须行驶的里程数。该分析表明,低稳定性车辆的致命翻车率不可能在合理里程数下出现。