Kumar A, Ghate V, Kim M J, Zhou W, Khoo G H, Yuk H G
Food Science and Technology Programme, Department of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
National University of Singapore (Suzhou) Research Institute, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
J Appl Microbiol. 2016 Jan;120(1):49-56. doi: 10.1111/jam.12975.
Little information is available on a direct comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of light emitting diode (LEDs) of different peak wavelengths. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of LEDs of three different wavelengths on bacterial inactivation.
Lactobacillus plantarum, Staphylococcus aureus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus were illuminated with 405, 460 and 520 nm LEDs at 4, 10 and 25°C respectively. Inactivation curves were plotted and fitted using Gompertz Model. Illumination with 405 and 460 nm LED produced significant inactivation (P < 0·05) in the population of V. parahaemolyticus (>4 log) while Lact. plantarum and Staph. aureus showed relatively less susceptibility to the LED illumination. The 520 nm LED produced negligible inactivation.
The 405 and 460 nm LEDs proved more effective in inactivating the selected foodborne bacteria in this study compared to 520 nm LED. The 405 nm LED showed the greatest antibacterial effect at the same level of energy dose.
The results in this study demonstrated the antibacterial efficacy of 405 nm LED on Lact. plantarum and V. parahaemolyticus, suggesting its potential for use in food industry for the control of these micro-organisms.
关于不同峰值波长的发光二极管(LED)抗菌效果的直接比较,目前可获取的信息较少。因此,本研究的目的是评估三种不同波长的LED对细菌灭活的影响。
分别在4℃、10℃和25℃下,用405nm、460nm和520nm的LED照射植物乳杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和副溶血性弧菌。绘制灭活曲线并使用Gompertz模型进行拟合。用405nm和460nm的LED照射可使副溶血性弧菌群体产生显著灭活(P<0.05)(>4个对数级),而植物乳杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌对LED照射的敏感性相对较低。520nm的LED产生的灭活作用可忽略不计。
在本研究中,与520nm的LED相比,405nm和460nm的LED在灭活所选食源细菌方面更有效。在相同能量剂量水平下,405nm的LED显示出最大的抗菌效果。
本研究结果证明了405nm的LED对植物乳杆菌和副溶血性弧菌的抗菌效果,表明其在食品工业中用于控制这些微生物的潜力。