Xu Bin, Wang Laura, Tuttle R Michael, Ganly Ian, Ghossein Ronald
Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065.
Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065.
Hum Pathol. 2015 Dec;46(12):1789-98. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.08.015. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
Continuous controversy surrounds the predictive value of the degree of vascular invasion (VI) in low-grade encapsulated follicular cell-derived thyroid carcinomas (LGEFCs). Some guidelines advocate conservative therapy in LGEFCs with focal VI. There is therefore a need to assess the survival rates of LGEFC patients with various degrees of VI to better stratify patients for subsequent therapy. Furthermore, the prognostic effect of VI within the different histotypes of LGEFCs is not well known. A total of 276 patients with LGEFCs were subjected to a meticulous histopathologic analysis. They were classified as encapsulated papillary thyroid carcinoma, encapsulated follicular carcinoma (EFC), and encapsulated Hurthle cell carcinoma (EHCC). Of the 276 patients, 24 had extensive VI (EVI) (≥4 foci) and 28 displayed focal (<4 foci) VI. EHCC and EFC showed a much higher rate of EVI than encapsulated papillary thyroid carcinoma. Median follow-up was 6 years. All 14 tumors with adverse behavior harbored distant metastases (DMs), of which 9 had DMs at presentation. All 3 patients without EVI who had aggressive carcinomas harbored DMs at presentation. EVI was an independent predictor of poor recurrence-free survival. Excluding cases with DMs at presentation, only patients with EVI had recurrence, and all relapsed cases were EHCC. EVI is an independent predictor of recurrence-free survival in LGEFCs. EHCC with EVI has a particularly high risk of recurrence. When DMs are not found at presentation, patients with focal VI are at a very low risk of recurrence even if not treated with radioactive iodine.
低度包膜性滤泡细胞源性甲状腺癌(LGEFC)中血管侵犯(VI)程度的预测价值一直存在争议。一些指南主张对存在局灶性VI的LGEFC采取保守治疗。因此,有必要评估不同VI程度的LGEFC患者的生存率,以便更好地对患者进行分层,为后续治疗提供依据。此外,LGEFC不同组织学类型中VI的预后影响尚不清楚。对276例LGEFC患者进行了细致的组织病理学分析。他们被分为包膜性乳头状甲状腺癌、包膜性滤泡癌(EFC)和包膜性许特莱细胞癌(EHCC)。在这276例患者中,24例有广泛VI(EVI)(≥4个病灶),28例表现为局灶性(<4个病灶)VI。EHCC和EFC的EVI发生率远高于包膜性乳头状甲状腺癌。中位随访时间为6年。所有14例具有不良行为的肿瘤均有远处转移(DMs),其中9例在初诊时即有DMs。所有3例无EVI但患有侵袭性癌的患者在初诊时均有DMs。EVI是无复发生存不良的独立预测因素。排除初诊时即有DMs的病例,只有EVI患者出现复发,且所有复发病例均为EHCC。EVI是LGEFC无复发生存的独立预测因素。伴有EVI的EHCC复发风险特别高。当初诊时未发现DMs时,即使未接受放射性碘治疗