• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Limestone percussion tools from the late Early Pleistocene sites of Barranco León and Fuente Nueva 3 (Orce, Spain).来自西班牙奥塞巴尔兰科·莱昂和富恩特·努埃瓦3号遗址早更新世晚期的石灰岩敲击工具。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 19;370(1682). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0352.
2
Subspheroids in the lithic assemblage of Barranco León (Spain): Recognizing the late Oldowan in Europe.贝伦洛尼(西班牙)石器组合中的亚球状器:认识欧洲的晚更新世旧石器时代早期。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 30;15(1):e0228290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228290. eCollection 2020.
3
The earliest cut marks of Europe: a discussion on hominin subsistence patterns in the Orce sites (Baza basin, SE Spain).欧洲最早的切割痕迹:关于奥雷斯遗址(西班牙东南巴扎盆地)人类生存模式的讨论。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 28;9(1):15408. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51957-5.
4
The lithic assemblages of Donggutuo, Nihewan basin: Knapping skills of early pleistocene hominins in North China.泥河湾盆地东谷坨的石器组合:华北早更新世人类的打片技术
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 21;12(9):e0185101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185101. eCollection 2017.
5
The TD6 level lithic industry from Gran Dolina, Atapuerca (Burgos, Spain): production and use.来自西班牙布尔戈斯阿塔普埃尔卡格兰多利纳的TD6阶段石器工业:生产与使用
J Hum Evol. 1999 Sep-Oct;37(3-4):653-93. doi: 10.1006/jhev.1999.0336.
6
Adaptive flexibility of Oldowan hominins: secondary use of flakes at Bizat Ruhama, Israel.旧石器时代人类的适应灵活性:在以色列比扎特鲁哈马的二次使用石片。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 20;8(6):e66851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066851. Print 2013.
7
Insights into early lithic technologies from ethnography.从民族志看早期石器技术
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 19;370(1682). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0356.
8
Variability in an early hominin percussive tradition: the Acheulean versus cultural variation in modern chimpanzee artefacts.早期古人类敲击传统的变异性:阿舍利文化与现代黑猩猩手工艺品的文化差异
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 19;370(1682). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0358.
9
Is there a Developed Oldowan A at Olduvai Gorge? A diachronic analysis of the Oldowan in Bed I and Lower-Middle Bed II at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania.奥杜威峡谷是否存在发展完善的旧石器时代早期阿舍利技术?坦桑尼亚奥杜威峡谷 I 层和下中层 II 层的旧石器时代研究。
J Hum Evol. 2018 Jul;120:92-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 May 8.
10
Identifying bipolar knapping in the Mesolithic site of Font del Ros (northeast Iberia).在丰特德尔罗斯中石器时代遗址(伊比利亚半岛东北部)识别双极打片技术。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 19;370(1682). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0354.

引用本文的文献

1
Reconstructing hammerstone size flake by flake: an experimental approach.逐片重建石锤大小的石片:一种实验方法。
J R Soc Interface. 2025 May;22(226):20240879. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0879. Epub 2025 May 14.
2
Earliest evidence of human occupations and technological complexity above the 45th North parallel in Western Europe. The site of Lunery-Rosieres la-Terre-des-Sablons (France, 1.1 Ma).西欧 45 度以北地区最早的人类居住和技术复杂性的证据。法国 Lunery-Rosieres la-Terre-des-Sablons 遗址(1.1 万年前)。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 23;14(1):16894. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66980-4.
3
The limestone spheroids of 'Ubeidiya: intentional imposition of symmetric geometry by early hominins?乌贝迪亚的石灰岩球体:早期人类有意施加的对称几何形状?
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Sep 6;10(9):230671. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230671. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Taphonomic and spatial analyses from the Early Pleistocene site of Venta Micena 4 (Orce, Guadix-Baza Basin, southern Spain).文塔米塞纳 4 号遗址(西班牙南部瓜迪克斯-巴扎盆地奥雷斯)早更新世的埋藏学和空间分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 7;11(1):13977. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93261-1.
5
An integrated study discloses chopping tools use from Late Acheulean Revadim (Israel).一项综合研究揭示了来自晚期阿舍利时代的雷瓦迪姆(以色列)的砍砸器使用情况。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 19;16(1):e0245595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245595. eCollection 2021.
6
Shaped stone balls were used for bone marrow extraction at Lower Paleolithic Qesem Cave, Israel.形状规整的石球曾被用于在以色列旧石器时代下切斯姆洞(Lower Paleolithic Qesem Cave)提取骨髓。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 9;15(4):e0230972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230972. eCollection 2020.
7
Subspheroids in the lithic assemblage of Barranco León (Spain): Recognizing the late Oldowan in Europe.贝伦洛尼(西班牙)石器组合中的亚球状器:认识欧洲的晚更新世旧石器时代早期。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 30;15(1):e0228290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228290. eCollection 2020.
8
Shedding light on the Early Pleistocene of TD6 (Gran Dolina, Atapuerca, Spain): The technological sequence and occupational inferences.揭示TD6(西班牙阿塔普尔卡格兰多利纳)早更新世:技术序列与居住推断
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 25;13(1):e0190889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190889. eCollection 2018.
9
Variability in an early hominin percussive tradition: the Acheulean versus cultural variation in modern chimpanzee artefacts.早期古人类敲击传统的变异性:阿舍利文化与现代黑猩猩手工艺品的文化差异
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 19;370(1682). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0358.
10
The development of plant food processing in the Levant: insights from use-wear analysis of Early Epipalaeolithic ground stone tools.黎凡特地区植物性食品加工的发展:来自旧石器时代早期磨制石器使用磨损分析的见解
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 19;370(1682). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0357.

本文引用的文献

1
Insights into early lithic technologies from ethnography.从民族志看早期石器技术
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 19;370(1682). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0356.
2
A new type of anvil in the Acheulian of Gesher Benot Ya'aqov, Israel.以色列盖舍尔贝诺特亚科夫阿舍利文化中的一种新型砧石。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 19;370(1682). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0353.
3
3.3-million-year-old stone tools from Lomekwi 3, West Turkana, Kenya.来自肯尼亚图尔卡纳湖以西的洛美奎 3 地点的 330 万年前的石器。
Nature. 2015 May 21;521(7552):310-5. doi: 10.1038/nature14464.
4
An older origin for the Acheulean at Melka Kunture (Upper Awash, Ethiopia): techno-economic behaviours at Garba IVD.梅尔卡库图雷(埃塞俄比亚上阿瓦什)阿舍利石器工业的较古老起源:加巴 IVD 的技术经济行为。
J Hum Evol. 2013 Nov;65(5):594-620. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
5
The oldest human fossil in Europe, from Orce (Spain).欧洲最古老的人类化石,出土于西班牙奥塞斯。
J Hum Evol. 2013 Jul;65(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.01.012. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
6
The evolution and cultural transmission of percussive technology: integrating evidence from palaeoanthropology and primatology.打击技术的进化和文化传承:整合古人类学和灵长类学的证据。
J Hum Evol. 2009 Oct;57(4):420-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.12.010. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
7
Raw material selectivity of the earliest stone toolmakers at Gona, Afar, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚阿法尔戈纳最早的石器制造者的原材料选择性。
J Hum Evol. 2005 Apr;48(4):365-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.10.006. Epub 2005 Jan 26.
8
Early human occupation of Western Europe: paleomagnetic dates for two paleolithic sites in Spain.西欧早期人类居住情况:西班牙两个旧石器时代遗址的古地磁年代测定
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Sep 12;97(19):10666-70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.180319797.
9
Early hominid stone tool production and technical skill 2.34 Myr ago in West Turkana, Kenya.234万年前在肯尼亚的图尔卡纳湖西部地区早期原始人类的石器制作与技术技能。
Nature. 1999 May 6;399(6731):57-60. doi: 10.1038/19959.
10
2.5-million-year-old stone tools from Gona, Ethiopia.来自埃塞俄比亚戈纳的有250万年历史的石器。
Nature. 1997 Jan 23;385(6614):333-6. doi: 10.1038/385333a0.

来自西班牙奥塞巴尔兰科·莱昂和富恩特·努埃瓦3号遗址早更新世晚期的石灰岩敲击工具。

Limestone percussion tools from the late Early Pleistocene sites of Barranco León and Fuente Nueva 3 (Orce, Spain).

作者信息

Barsky Deborah, Vergès Josep-María, Sala Robert, Menéndez Leticia, Toro-Moyano Isidro

机构信息

Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social, c/Marcelli Domingo s/n, Campus Sescelades URV, Edifici W3, 43007 Tarragona, Spain Area de Prehistoria, Universitat Rovira i Virgili (URV), Avinguda de Catalunya 35, 43002 Tarragona, Spain

Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social, c/Marcelli Domingo s/n, Campus Sescelades URV, Edifici W3, 43007 Tarragona, Spain Area de Prehistoria, Universitat Rovira i Virgili (URV), Avinguda de Catalunya 35, 43002 Tarragona, Spain.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 19;370(1682). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0352.

DOI:10.1098/rstb.2014.0352
PMID:26483530
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4614715/
Abstract

In recent years, there is growing interest in the study of percussion scars and breakage patterns on hammerstones, cores and tools from Oldowan African and Eurasian lithic assemblages. Oldowan stone toolkits generally contain abundant small-sized flakes and their corresponding cores, and are characterized by their structural dichotomy of heavy- and light-duty tools. This paper explores the significance of the lesser known heavy-duty tool component, providing data from the late Lower Pleistocene sites of Barranco León and Fuente Nueva 3 (Orce, Spain), dated 1.4-1.2 Myr. Using quantitative and qualitative data from the large-sized limestone industries from these two major sites, we present a new methodology highlighting their morpho-technological features. In the light of the results, we discuss the shortfalls of extant classificatory methods for interpreting the role of percussive technology in early toolkits. This work is rooted in an experimental program designed to reproduce the wide range of percussion marks observed on the limestone artefacts from these two sites. A visual and descriptive reference is provided as an interpretative aid for future comparative research. Further experiments using a variety of materials and gestures are still needed before the elusive traces yield the secrets of the kinds of percussive activities carried out by hominins at these, and other, Oldowan sites.

摘要

近年来,人们对来自非洲奥杜威峡谷和欧亚大陆旧石器组合中的石锤、石核及工具上的敲击疤痕和破损模式的研究兴趣与日俱增。奥杜威石器组合通常包含大量小型石片及其相应的石核,其特点是重型和轻型工具在结构上呈二分法。本文探讨了鲜为人知的重型工具部分的重要性,提供了来自西班牙奥尔塞晚更新世早期遗址巴兰科·莱昂和富恩特·努埃瓦3号遗址(年代为140万至120万年前)的数据。利用这两个主要遗址大型石灰岩工业的定量和定性数据,我们提出了一种突出其形态技术特征的新方法。根据研究结果,我们讨论了现有分类方法在解释早期工具组合中敲击技术作用方面的不足。这项工作基于一个实验项目,旨在重现从这两个遗址的石灰岩文物上观察到的各种敲击痕迹。提供了一份视觉和描述性参考资料,作为未来比较研究的解释辅助工具。在这些难以捉摸的痕迹揭示人类在这些以及其他奥杜威遗址进行的敲击活动种类的秘密之前,仍需要使用各种材料和手法进行进一步的实验。