Suppr超能文献

奥杜威峡谷是否存在发展完善的旧石器时代早期阿舍利技术?坦桑尼亚奥杜威峡谷 I 层和下中层 II 层的旧石器时代研究。

Is there a Developed Oldowan A at Olduvai Gorge? A diachronic analysis of the Oldowan in Bed I and Lower-Middle Bed II at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania.

机构信息

Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31-34 Gordon Square, WC1H 0PY, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Hum Evol. 2018 Jul;120:92-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 May 8.

Abstract

Debates regarding the validity of the Developed Oldowan as separate cultural facies within the Oldowan techno-complex have primarily concentrated on the Developed Oldowan B/Acheulean transition, with little attention paid to the validity of the Developed Oldowan A (DOA) as a valid technological differentiation. This study presents a diachronic technological analysis and comparison of Oldowan and DOA lithic assemblages from Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania, dated between 1.84 and 1.6 Ma, to test the validity of Leakey's original distinction between these two cultural facies. The results from this comparative analysis show very few technological differences between the lithic assemblages previously assigned to the DOA and Classic Oldowan. Significant diachronic variation in raw material availability and use is, however, identified between Bed I and Lower/Middle Bed II of Olduvai Gorge, which may go some way to explaining the originally perceived techno-cultural differences. The results suggest an increase in hominin knapping and percussive activities, as well as a clear ability to preferentially select high quality raw materials stratigraphically above Tuff IF. Technological innovation and complexity, however, does not seem to vary significantly between the Classic Oldowan and DOA assemblages. The results of this analysis along with similar studies from the wider eastern African region lead to the conclusion that the term Developed Oldowan A should no longer be used.

摘要

关于在旧石器时代技术复合体中,发达奥杜威文化面是否具有独立的文化特征的争论,主要集中在发达奥杜威 B/阿舍利过渡时期,而对发达奥杜威 A(DOA)作为一种有效技术差异的有效性关注甚少。本研究通过对坦桑尼亚奥杜威峡谷的旧石器时代和 DOA 石器组合进行历时性技术分析和比较,对这两个文化面进行了测试,这些石器组合的年代在 184 万至 160 万年前,以检验利基最初对这两个文化面的区分的有效性。比较分析的结果表明,之前被归入 DOA 和经典旧石器时代的石器组合之间只有很少的技术差异。然而,奥杜威峡谷的 I 层和下/中 II 层之间的原材料可用性和使用情况存在显著的历时变化,这可能在一定程度上解释了最初感知到的技术文化差异。结果表明,人类的敲击和冲击活动有所增加,并且能够清楚地优先选择在 Tuff IF 层之上的优质原材料。然而,经典旧石器时代和 DOA 组合之间的技术创新和复杂性似乎没有明显的变化。本分析的结果以及来自东非更广泛地区的类似研究得出的结论是,发达奥杜威 A 一词不应再使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验