• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Physician Motivation: Listening to What Pay-for-Performance Programs and Quality Improvement Collaboratives Are Telling Us.

作者信息

Herzer Kurt R, Pronovost Peter J

机构信息

Medical Scientist Training Program, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Nov;41(11):522-8. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41069-4.

DOI:10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41069-4
PMID:26484685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5099521/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Physician Motivation: Listening to What Pay-for-Performance Programs and Quality Improvement Collaboratives Are Telling Us.医生的动机：倾听绩效薪酬计划和质量改进协作组织告诉我们的内容。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Nov;41(11):522-8. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41069-4.
2
Professionalism, Performance, and the Future of Physician Incentives.专业精神、绩效与医生激励机制的未来
JAMA. 2018 Dec 18;320(23):2419-2420. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.17719.
3
Beyond Measurement and Reward: Methods of Motivating Quality Improvement and Accountability.超越衡量与奖励：激励质量改进与问责的方法。
Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec;50 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):2155-86. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12413. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
4
Assessing individual physician performance: does measurement suppress motivation?评估个体医生的表现：衡量是否会抑制积极性？
JAMA. 2012 Jun 27;307(24):2595-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.6382.
5
Pay-for-performance: toxic to quality? Insights from behavioral economics.按效付费：对质量有毒害？行为经济学的洞见。
Int J Health Serv. 2014;44(2):203-14. doi: 10.2190/HS.44.2.a.
6
Time for institutions to rethink physician motivation.各机构是时候重新思考医生的激励机制了。
Med Netw Strategy Rep. 1999 Apr;8(4):1, 7-9.
7
Participating physician preferences regarding a pay-for-performance incentive design: a discrete choice experiment.参与研究的医生对绩效薪酬激励设计的偏好：一项离散选择实验。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Feb;28(1):40-6. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv098. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
8
An Incentive to Innovate: Improving Health Care Value and Restoring Physician Autonomy Through Physician-Directed Reinvestment.激励创新：通过医生主导的再投资提高医疗保健价值并恢复医生自主权。
Acad Med. 2020 Nov;95(11):1702-1706. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003650.
9
Improving Care for Critical Care Patients by Strategic Alignment of Quality Goals With a Physician Financial Incentive Model.通过将质量目标与医师财务激励模型进行战略调整来改善重症监护患者的护理。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2021;30(1):21-26. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000281.
10
Emergency Physicians Seek Their Place in a Pay-for-Value World.急诊医生在价值付费的世界中寻求自身定位。
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Apr;67(4):A18-20. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.02.014.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance-based payment systems for general practitioners and specialists in selected countries: a comparative study.部分国家全科医生和专科医生基于绩效的支付系统：一项比较研究。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2025 May 31;66(1):E114-E125. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2025.66.1.3511. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Theory-informed refinement and tailored implementation of a quality improvement program in maternity care to reduce unwarranted clinical variation across a health service network.基于理论的产妇护理质量改进项目的优化与定制实施，以减少整个医疗服务网络中不必要的临床差异。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 25;25(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12267-x.
3
Improving healthcare value: Choosing Wisely Canada's hospital designation program.提升医疗保健价值：加拿大“明智选择”医院指定计划
J Hosp Med. 2025 Aug;20(8):886-889. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13593. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
4
Exploring paediatricians' experiences with performance improvement modules and quality improvement.探讨儿科医生在绩效改进模块和质量改进方面的经验。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 May;11(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001674.
5
Engaging Frontline Physicians in Value Improvement: A Qualitative Evaluation of Physician-Directed Reinvestment.让一线医生参与价值提升：对医生主导的再投资的定性评估。
J Healthc Leadersh. 2022 Apr 8;14:31-45. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S335763. eCollection 2022.
6
Strategies for laboratory professionals to drive laboratory stewardship.实验室专业人员推动实验室管理的策略。
Pract Lab Med. 2021 Jul 24;26:e00249. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2021.e00249. eCollection 2021 Aug.
7
Strengthening data collection and use for quality improvement in primary care: the case of Costa Rica.加强初级保健中用于质量改进的数据收集与使用：以哥斯达黎加为例。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Jun 3;36(5):740-753. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab043.
8
How and under what circumstances do quality improvement collaboratives lead to better outcomes? A systematic review.质量改进合作如何以及在什么情况下能带来更好的结果？系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2020 May 4;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-0978-z.
9
Characteristics of State and Federal Malpractice Litigation of Medical Liability Claims for Keratinocyte Carcinoma, 1968 to 2018.1968 年至 2018 年，关于角化细胞癌的医疗责任索赔的州和联邦医疗事故诉讼的特点。
JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Jul 1;155(7):812-818. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.0430.
10
Patient Safety Incentives for Residents: A Slippery Slope or Reinforcement of Desirable Behavior?针对住院医师的患者安全激励措施：是滑坡效应还是对理想行为的强化？
J Grad Med Educ. 2018 Dec;10(6):680-682. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00826.1.

本文引用的文献

1
Collateral Damage: Pay-for-Performance Initiatives and Safety-Net Hospitals.附带损害：绩效薪酬举措与安全网医院
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Sep 15;163(6):473-4. doi: 10.7326/M15-1393.
2
Clinical Communities at Johns Hopkins Medicine: An Emerging Approach to Quality Improvement.约翰霍普金斯医学院的临床社区：一种质量改进的新方法。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Sep;41(9):387-95. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41050-5.
3
The Armstrong Institute: An Academic Institute for Patient Safety and Quality Improvement, Research, Training, and Practice.阿姆斯特朗研究所：一个专注于患者安全与质量改进、研究、培训和实践的学术机构。
Acad Med. 2015 Oct;90(10):1331-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000760.
4
Creating a high-reliability health care system: improving performance on core processes of care at Johns Hopkins Medicine.创建高可靠性医疗体系：提升约翰·霍普金斯医疗核心护理流程的表现。
Acad Med. 2015 Feb;90(2):165-72. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000610.
5
Relation between door-to-balloon times and mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention over time: a retrospective study.随着时间推移，直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中门球时间与死亡率之间的关系：一项回顾性研究
Lancet. 2015 Mar 21;385(9973):1114-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61932-2. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
6
Cost-effectiveness of a quality improvement programme to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units in the USA.美国一项旨在降低重症监护病房中心静脉导管相关血流感染的质量改进计划的成本效益
BMJ Open. 2014 Sep 25;4(9):e006065. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006065.
7
Long-term effect of hospital pay for performance on mortality in England.英国医院按绩效付费对死亡率的长期影响。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Aug 7;371(6):540-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1400962.
8
Pay-for-performance: toxic to quality? Insights from behavioral economics.按效付费：对质量有毒害？行为经济学的洞见。
Int J Health Serv. 2014;44(2):203-14. doi: 10.2190/HS.44.2.a.
9
Motivating physicians to improve quality: light the intrinsic fire.激励医生提高医疗质量：点燃内在之火。
Am J Med Qual. 2014 Sep-Oct;29(5):451-3. doi: 10.1177/1062860613510201. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
10
A case study of a team-based, quality-focused compensation model for primary care providers.一项针对基层医疗服务提供者的基于团队且注重质量的薪酬模式的案例研究。
Med Care Res Rev. 2014 Jun;71(3):207-23. doi: 10.1177/1077558713506749. Epub 2013 Nov 13.