Suppr超能文献

按效付费:对质量有毒害?行为经济学的洞见。

Pay-for-performance: toxic to quality? Insights from behavioral economics.

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 2014;44(2):203-14. doi: 10.2190/HS.44.2.a.

Abstract

Pay-for-performance programs aim to upgrade health care quality by tailoring financial incentives for desirable behaviors. While Medicare and many private insurers are charging ahead with pay-for-performance, researchers have been unable to show that it benefits patients. Findings from the new field of behavioral economics challenge the traditional economic view that monetary reward either is the only motivator or is simply additive to intrinsic motivators such as purpose or altruism. Studies have shown that monetary rewards can undermine motivation and worsen performance on cognitively complex and intrinsically rewarding work, suggesting that pay-for-performance may backfire.

摘要

按绩效付费计划旨在通过调整对理想行为的经济激励来提高医疗保健质量。虽然医疗保险和许多私人保险公司都在推行按绩效付费,但研究人员还未能证明它对患者有益。行为经济学这一新领域的研究结果对传统经济学观点提出了挑战,传统经济学观点认为,金钱奖励要么是唯一的激励因素,要么只是对内在激励因素(如目标或利他主义)的补充。研究表明,金钱奖励可能会破坏动机,并导致认知复杂和内在奖励工作的表现恶化,这表明按绩效付费可能会适得其反。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验