Suppr超能文献

按效付费:对质量有毒害?行为经济学的洞见。

Pay-for-performance: toxic to quality? Insights from behavioral economics.

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 2014;44(2):203-14. doi: 10.2190/HS.44.2.a.

Abstract

Pay-for-performance programs aim to upgrade health care quality by tailoring financial incentives for desirable behaviors. While Medicare and many private insurers are charging ahead with pay-for-performance, researchers have been unable to show that it benefits patients. Findings from the new field of behavioral economics challenge the traditional economic view that monetary reward either is the only motivator or is simply additive to intrinsic motivators such as purpose or altruism. Studies have shown that monetary rewards can undermine motivation and worsen performance on cognitively complex and intrinsically rewarding work, suggesting that pay-for-performance may backfire.

摘要

按绩效付费计划旨在通过调整对理想行为的经济激励来提高医疗保健质量。虽然医疗保险和许多私人保险公司都在推行按绩效付费,但研究人员还未能证明它对患者有益。行为经济学这一新领域的研究结果对传统经济学观点提出了挑战,传统经济学观点认为,金钱奖励要么是唯一的激励因素,要么只是对内在激励因素(如目标或利他主义)的补充。研究表明,金钱奖励可能会破坏动机,并导致认知复杂和内在奖励工作的表现恶化,这表明按绩效付费可能会适得其反。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验