Pesec Madeline, Spigel Lauren, Granados José María Molina, Bitton Asaf, Hirschhorn Lisa R, Brizuela Jorge Arturo Jiménez, Pignone Michael, Sáenz María Del Rocío, Schwarz Dan, Villegas Del Carpio Oscar, Wilson Ira B, Zamora Méndez Eduardo, Ratcliffe Hannah L
Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital & Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Jun 3;36(5):740-753. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab043.
Costa Rica is a bright spot of primary healthcare (PHC) performance, providing first-contact accessibility and continuous, comprehensive, coordinated, and patient-centered care to its citizens. Previous research hypothesized that strong data collection and use for quality improvement are central to Costa Rica's success. Using qualitative data from 40 interviews with stakeholders across the Costa Rican healthcare system, this paper maps the various data streams at the PHC level and delineates how these data are used to make decisions around insuring and improving the quality of PHC delivery. We describe four main types of PHC data: individual patient data, population health data, national healthcare delivery data, and local supplementary healthcare delivery data. In particular, we find that the Healthcare Delivery Performance Index-a ranking of the nation's 106 Health Areas using 15 quality indicators-is utilized by Health Area Directors to create quality improvement initiatives, ranging from education and coaching to optimization of care delivery and coordination. By ranking Health Areas, the Index harnesses providers' intrinsic motivation to stimulate improvement without financial incentives. We detail how a strong culture of valuing data as a tool for improving population health and robust training for personnel have enabled effective data collection and use. However, we also find that the country's complex data systems create unnecessary duplication and can inhibit efficient data use. Costa Rica's experience with data collection, analysis, and use for quality improvement hold important lessons for PHC in other public sector systems.
哥斯达黎加是初级卫生保健(PHC)绩效方面的一个亮点,为其公民提供首次接触的可及性以及持续、全面、协调且以患者为中心的医疗服务。先前的研究假设,强大的数据收集和用于质量改进的数据使用是哥斯达黎加取得成功的核心。本文利用对哥斯达黎加医疗系统中各利益相关者进行的40次访谈所获得的定性数据,绘制了初级卫生保健层面的各种数据流,并描述了这些数据如何被用于围绕确保和提高初级卫生保健服务质量做出决策。我们描述了初级卫生保健数据的四种主要类型:个体患者数据、人群健康数据、国家医疗服务提供数据以及地方补充医疗服务提供数据。特别是,我们发现,卫生保健服务绩效指数(使用15项质量指标对该国106个卫生区域进行排名)被卫生区域主任用于制定质量改进举措,范围从教育和培训到优化医疗服务提供与协调。通过对卫生区域进行排名,该指数利用了提供者的内在动力来促进改进,而无需经济激励。我们详细阐述了将数据视为改善人群健康的工具的浓厚文化以及对人员进行的有力培训如何实现了有效的数据收集和使用。然而,我们也发现,该国复杂的数据系统造成了不必要的重复,并且可能会抑制数据的有效使用。哥斯达黎加在数据收集、分析和用于质量改进方面的经验为其他公共部门系统中的初级卫生保健提供了重要的借鉴。