Devoize L, Chalaye P, Lafrenaye S, Marchand S, Dallel R
Clermont Université, Université d'Auvergne, Neuro-Dol, France.
Clermont-Ferrand & Inserm U1107, France.
Eur J Pain. 2016 May;20(5):731-41. doi: 10.1002/ejp.799. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
The mechanisms of adaptation to tonic pain are not elucidated. We hypothesized that the adaptability to tonic pain is related to the cardiovascular system.
Twenty-six subjects received over two sessions in a random order: tonic cold (7 ± 0.2 °C) and heat pain (47.5 ± 0.5 °C) on the hand for 5 min. Pain intensity, blood pressure (BP), and heart rate (HR) were continuously monitored.
Pain experience during the heat (HIT) and cold (CIT) immersion tests exhibited different average time courses, being approximated with a linear and cubic function, respectively. In each test, two groups of participants could be identified based on the time course of their tonic thermal pain: one-third of participants were pain adaptive and two-thirds non adaptive. The adaptive group exhibited higher initial pain, lower last pain, and shorter latency to peak pain than the non-adaptive one. Interestingly, some participants were adaptive to both pain stimuli, most were not. HIT as well as CIT produced a stable elevation of BP. However, BP was higher during CIT than HIT (p = 0.034). HR was also increased during CIT and HIT, but the two tests differed with respect to the time course of responses. Finally, the intensity and time course of pain rating to both HIT and CIT correlated with neither BP nor HR responses.
These results suggest that individual sensitivity and adaptability to tonic thermal pain is related to the intensity of initial pain rating and the latency to peak pain but not to cardiovascular responses.
适应持续性疼痛的机制尚未阐明。我们推测对持续性疼痛的适应性与心血管系统有关。
26名受试者以随机顺序接受两个阶段的测试:手部进行5分钟的持续性冷刺激(7±0.2°C)和热痛刺激(47.5±0.5°C)。持续监测疼痛强度、血压(BP)和心率(HR)。
热刺激(HIT)和冷刺激(CIT)浸入测试期间的疼痛体验呈现出不同的平均时间进程,分别用线性函数和三次函数近似。在每个测试中,根据持续性热痛的时间进程可将参与者分为两组:三分之一的参与者具有疼痛适应性,三分之二的参与者无适应性。与无适应性组相比,适应性组表现出更高的初始疼痛、更低的最终疼痛以及更短的疼痛峰值潜伏期。有趣的是,一些参与者对两种疼痛刺激均有适应性,而大多数则没有。HIT和CIT均使血压稳定升高。然而,CIT期间的血压高于HIT(p = 0.034)。CIT和HIT期间心率也增加,但两种测试在反应的时间进程方面有所不同。最后,对HIT和CIT的疼痛评分强度及时间进程与血压和心率反应均无相关性。
这些结果表明,个体对持续性热痛的敏感性和适应性与初始疼痛评分强度及疼痛峰值潜伏期有关,而与心血管反应无关。