Edagawa Akiko, Kimura Akio, Kawabuchi-Kurata Takako, Adachi Shinichi, Furuhata Katsunori, Miyamoto Hiroshi
Division of Environment Health, Osaka Prefectural Institute of Public Health, Osaka 537-0025, Japan.
Division of Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga 849-8501, Japan.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Oct 19;12(10):13118-30. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121013118.
We investigated Legionella contamination in bath water samples, collected from 68 bathing facilities in Japan, by culture, culture with amoebic co-culture, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), and real-time qPCR with amoebic co-culture. Using the conventional culture method, Legionella pneumophila was detected in 11 samples (11/68, 16.2%). Contrary to our expectation, the culture method with the amoebic co-culture technique did not increase the detection rate of Legionella (4/68, 5.9%). In contrast, a combination of the amoebic co-culture technique followed by qPCR successfully increased the detection rate (57/68, 83.8%) compared with real-time qPCR alone (46/68, 67.6%). Using real-time qPCR after culture with amoebic co-culture, more than 10-fold higher bacterial numbers were observed in 30 samples (30/68, 44.1%) compared with the same samples without co-culture. On the other hand, higher bacterial numbers were not observed after propagation by amoebae in 32 samples (32/68, 47.1%). Legionella was not detected in the remaining six samples (6/68, 8.8%), irrespective of the method. These results suggest that application of the amoebic co-culture technique prior to real-time qPCR may be useful for the sensitive detection of Legionella from bath water samples. Furthermore, a combination of amoebic co-culture and real-time qPCR might be useful to detect viable and virulent Legionella because their ability to invade and multiply within free-living amoebae is considered to correlate with their pathogenicity for humans. This is the first report evaluating the efficacy of the amoebic co-culture technique for detecting Legionella in bath water samples.
我们通过培养、与变形虫共培养、实时定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)以及与变形虫共培养的实时qPCR,对从日本68个洗浴设施采集的洗浴水样中的军团菌污染情况进行了调查。采用传统培养方法,在11个样本中检测到嗜肺军团菌(11/68,16.2%)。与我们的预期相反,采用变形虫共培养技术的培养方法并未提高军团菌的检出率(4/68,5.9%)。相比之下,与单独的实时qPCR(46/68,67.6%)相比,变形虫共培养技术后进行qPCR的组合成功提高了检出率(57/68,83.8%)。在与变形虫共培养后使用实时qPCR,与未进行共培养的相同样本相比,在30个样本(30/68,44.1%)中观察到细菌数量高出10倍以上。另一方面,在32个样本(32/68,47.1%)中,变形虫繁殖后未观察到细菌数量增加。无论采用何种方法,其余6个样本(6/68,8.8%)均未检测到军团菌。这些结果表明,在实时qPCR之前应用变形虫共培养技术可能有助于从洗浴水样中灵敏地检测军团菌。此外,变形虫共培养和实时qPCR的组合可能有助于检测有活力和有毒力的军团菌,因为它们在自由生活变形虫内侵袭和繁殖的能力被认为与其对人类的致病性相关。这是第一份评估变形虫共培养技术检测洗浴水样中军团菌功效的报告。