Suppr超能文献

采用培养法、阿米巴共培养法和实时定量PCR法对沐浴水样中的军团菌污染情况进行调查。

Investigation of Legionella Contamination in Bath Water Samples by Culture, Amoebic Co-Culture, and Real-Time Quantitative PCR Methods.

作者信息

Edagawa Akiko, Kimura Akio, Kawabuchi-Kurata Takako, Adachi Shinichi, Furuhata Katsunori, Miyamoto Hiroshi

机构信息

Division of Environment Health, Osaka Prefectural Institute of Public Health, Osaka 537-0025, Japan.

Division of Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga 849-8501, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Oct 19;12(10):13118-30. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121013118.

Abstract

We investigated Legionella contamination in bath water samples, collected from 68 bathing facilities in Japan, by culture, culture with amoebic co-culture, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), and real-time qPCR with amoebic co-culture. Using the conventional culture method, Legionella pneumophila was detected in 11 samples (11/68, 16.2%). Contrary to our expectation, the culture method with the amoebic co-culture technique did not increase the detection rate of Legionella (4/68, 5.9%). In contrast, a combination of the amoebic co-culture technique followed by qPCR successfully increased the detection rate (57/68, 83.8%) compared with real-time qPCR alone (46/68, 67.6%). Using real-time qPCR after culture with amoebic co-culture, more than 10-fold higher bacterial numbers were observed in 30 samples (30/68, 44.1%) compared with the same samples without co-culture. On the other hand, higher bacterial numbers were not observed after propagation by amoebae in 32 samples (32/68, 47.1%). Legionella was not detected in the remaining six samples (6/68, 8.8%), irrespective of the method. These results suggest that application of the amoebic co-culture technique prior to real-time qPCR may be useful for the sensitive detection of Legionella from bath water samples. Furthermore, a combination of amoebic co-culture and real-time qPCR might be useful to detect viable and virulent Legionella because their ability to invade and multiply within free-living amoebae is considered to correlate with their pathogenicity for humans. This is the first report evaluating the efficacy of the amoebic co-culture technique for detecting Legionella in bath water samples.

摘要

我们通过培养、与变形虫共培养、实时定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)以及与变形虫共培养的实时qPCR,对从日本68个洗浴设施采集的洗浴水样中的军团菌污染情况进行了调查。采用传统培养方法,在11个样本中检测到嗜肺军团菌(11/68,16.2%)。与我们的预期相反,采用变形虫共培养技术的培养方法并未提高军团菌的检出率(4/68,5.9%)。相比之下,与单独的实时qPCR(46/68,67.6%)相比,变形虫共培养技术后进行qPCR的组合成功提高了检出率(57/68,83.8%)。在与变形虫共培养后使用实时qPCR,与未进行共培养的相同样本相比,在30个样本(30/68,44.1%)中观察到细菌数量高出10倍以上。另一方面,在32个样本(32/68,47.1%)中,变形虫繁殖后未观察到细菌数量增加。无论采用何种方法,其余6个样本(6/68,8.8%)均未检测到军团菌。这些结果表明,在实时qPCR之前应用变形虫共培养技术可能有助于从洗浴水样中灵敏地检测军团菌。此外,变形虫共培养和实时qPCR的组合可能有助于检测有活力和有毒力的军团菌,因为它们在自由生活变形虫内侵袭和繁殖的能力被认为与其对人类的致病性相关。这是第一份评估变形虫共培养技术检测洗浴水样中军团菌功效的报告。

相似文献

1
Investigation of Legionella Contamination in Bath Water Samples by Culture, Amoebic Co-Culture, and Real-Time Quantitative PCR Methods.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Oct 19;12(10):13118-30. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121013118.
4
Assessment of Legionella pneumophila in recreational spring water with quantitative PCR (Taqman) assay.
Pathog Glob Health. 2015 Jul;109(5):236-41. doi: 10.1179/2047773215Y.0000000023. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
5
[Isolation of Legionella and free-living amoebae at hot spring spas in Kanagawa, Japan].
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1998 Oct;72(10):1050-5. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.72.1050.
7
Evaluation of Legionella real-time PCR against traditional culture for routine and public health testing of water samples.
J Appl Microbiol. 2017 Jun;122(6):1692-1703. doi: 10.1111/jam.13461. Epub 2017 May 10.
8
Legionella pneumophilla bacteria in thermal saline bath.
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013;20(4):649-52.
9
[Distribution of Legionella spp. in hot spring baths in Japan].
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 2004 Aug;78(8):710-6. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.78.710.
10
Environmental survey of Legionella pneumophila in hot springs in Taiwan.
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2007 Jan;70(1):84-7. doi: 10.1080/15287390600754987.

本文引用的文献

1
Isolation of Legionella pneumophila from pluvial floods by amoebal coculture.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Jun;78(12):4519-21. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00131-12. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
3
Assessment of real-time PCR for quantification of Legionella spp. in spa water.
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010 Dec;51(6):639-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.02947.x. Epub 2010 Oct 11.
4
Evaluation of Legionella pneumophila contamination in Italian hotel water systems by quantitative real-time PCR and culture methods.
J Appl Microbiol. 2010 May;108(5):1576-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04553.x. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
6
[Legionella contamination risk factors in non-circulating hot spring water].
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 2009 Jan;83(1):36-44. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi.83.36.
7
Detection of culturable and nonculturable Legionella species from hot water systems of public buildings in Japan.
J Appl Microbiol. 2008 Dec;105(6):2104-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03932.x.
8
Long-term survival of Legionella pneumophila in the viable but nonculturable state after monochloramine treatment.
Curr Microbiol. 2008 Nov;57(5):497-502. doi: 10.1007/s00284-008-9275-9. Epub 2008 Oct 7.
10
Isolation and identification of amoeba-resisting bacteria from water in human environment by using an Acanthamoeba polyphaga co-culture procedure.
Environ Microbiol. 2008 May;10(5):1135-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01530.x. Epub 2008 Feb 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验