Alimohammadi Hossein, Shojaee Majid, Samiei Mehdi, Abyari Somayeh, Vafaee Ali, Mirkheshti Alireza
Department of Emergency Medicine, Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran.
Emerg (Tehran). 2013 Fall;1(1):11-4.
Given the high prevalence of upper extremity fractures and increasing need to perform painless reduction in the emergency departments, the use of analgesic methods with fewer complications and more satisfaction appears to be essential. The aim of this study is comparison the nerve stimulator guided axillary block (NSAB) with intravenous sedation in induction of analgesia for painless reduction of distal radius fractures.
In the present randomized clinical trial, 60 patients (18-70 years of age) suffered from distal radius fractures, were divided into two equal groups. One group received axillary nerve block by nerve stimulator guidance and the other procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) using midazolam/fentanyl. Onset of analgesia, duration of analgesic effect, total procedure time and pain scores were recorded using visual analogue scale (VAS) and the outcomes were compared. Chi-squared and student t test were performed to evaluate differences between two groups.
Sixty patients were randomly divided into two groups (83.3% male). The mean age of patients was 31 ±0.7 years. While the onset of analgesia was significantly longer in the NSAB group, the mean total time of procedure was shorter than PSA (p<0.001). The NSAB group needed a shorter post-operative observation time (P<0.001). Both groups experienced equal pain relief before, during and after procedure (p>0.05).
It seems that shorter post-operative monitoring time and consequently lesser total time of procedure, make nerve stimulator guided axillary block as an appropriate alternative for procedural sedation and analgesia in painless reduction of distal radius fractures in emergency department.
鉴于上肢骨折的高发病率以及急诊科对无痛复位的需求不断增加,使用并发症较少且满意度较高的镇痛方法似乎至关重要。本研究的目的是比较神经刺激器引导下的腋路阻滞(NSAB)与静脉镇静用于桡骨远端骨折无痛复位镇痛诱导的效果。
在本随机临床试验中,60例(年龄18 - 70岁)桡骨远端骨折患者被分为两组。一组接受神经刺激器引导下的腋神经阻滞,另一组使用咪达唑仑/芬太尼进行程序性镇静镇痛(PSA)。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)记录镇痛起效时间、镇痛效果持续时间、总操作时间和疼痛评分,并比较结果。采用卡方检验和学生t检验评估两组之间的差异。
60例患者随机分为两组(男性占83.3%)。患者的平均年龄为31±0.7岁。虽然NSAB组的镇痛起效时间明显更长,但平均总操作时间比PSA组短(p<0.001)。NSAB组术后观察时间较短(P<0.001)。两组在操作前、操作中和操作后疼痛缓解程度相同(p>0.05)。
术后监测时间较短以及总操作时间相应较短,这似乎使神经刺激器引导下的腋路阻滞成为急诊科桡骨远端骨折无痛复位程序性镇静镇痛合适的替代方法。