• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采后芒果果实抗胶孢炭疽菌相关防御基因的转录组特征及表达谱

Transcriptome characterization and expression profiles of the related defense genes in postharvest mango fruit against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides.

作者信息

Hong Keqian, Gong Deqiang, Zhang Lubin, Hu Huigang, Jia Zhiwei, Gu Hui, Song Kanghua

机构信息

Key Laboratory for Postharvest Physiology and Technology of Tropical Horticultural Products of Hainan Province, South Subtropical Crop Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.

Key Laboratory for Postharvest Physiology and Technology of Tropical Horticultural Products of Hainan Province, South Subtropical Crop Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Gene. 2016 Jan 15;576(1 Pt 2):275-83. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.10.041. Epub 2015 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.gene.2015.10.041
PMID:26496007
Abstract

Anthracnose, caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, is a major disease of the postharvest mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruit. However, a lack of transcriptomic and genomic information hinders our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the mango fruit defense response. Here, we studied the host responses of the mango fruit against C. gloeosporioides using Illumina paired-end sequencing technology, and expression profiles of 35 defense-related genes were further analyzed by qRT-PCR. The results indicated that 5.9Gigabase pair clean reads were assembled into a total of 131,750 unigenes, of which 89,050 unigenes found to be homologous to genes in the NCBI GenBank database and 61,694 unigenes annonated in the Swiss-Prot database. Orthologous analyses showed that 47,770 unigenes were assigned with one or more Gene Ontology terms and 44,145 unigenes were classified into 256 Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways. Moreover, qRT-PCR of 35 defense-related unigenes, including 17 ethylene response factors (ERFs), 6 nucleotide binding site-leucine-rich repeats (NBS-LRRs), 6 nonexpressor of pathogenesis-related genes (NPRs) and 6 pathogenesis-related protein (PRs), revealed that most of these defense-related genes were up-regulated after C. gloeosporioides infection. Taken together, our study provides a platform to discover new candidate genes in mango fruit in relation to pathogen resistance.

摘要

由胶孢炭疽菌引起的炭疽病是芒果(Mangifera indica L.)采后果实的一种主要病害。然而,转录组和基因组信息的缺乏阻碍了我们对芒果果实防御反应潜在分子机制的理解。在此,我们利用Illumina双末端测序技术研究了芒果果实对胶孢炭疽菌的宿主反应,并通过qRT-PCR进一步分析了35个与防御相关基因的表达谱。结果表明,59亿碱基对的干净 reads 被组装成总共131,750个单基因,其中89,050个单基因被发现与NCBI GenBank数据库中的基因同源,61,694个单基因在Swiss-Prot数据库中被注释。直系同源分析表明,47,770个单基因被赋予一个或多个基因本体论术语,44,145个单基因被分类到256条京都基因与基因组百科全书途径中。此外,对35个与防御相关的单基因进行qRT-PCR分析,包括17个乙烯反应因子(ERF)、6个核苷酸结合位点富含亮氨酸重复序列(NBS-LRR)、6个病程相关基因非表达子(NPR)和6个病程相关蛋白(PR),结果显示,这些与防御相关的基因在胶孢炭疽菌感染后大多上调。综上所述,我们的研究提供了一个平台,用于发现芒果果实中与抗病性相关的新候选基因。

相似文献

1
Transcriptome characterization and expression profiles of the related defense genes in postharvest mango fruit against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides.采后芒果果实抗胶孢炭疽菌相关防御基因的转录组特征及表达谱
Gene. 2016 Jan 15;576(1 Pt 2):275-83. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.10.041. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
2
De-novo assembly of mango fruit peel transcriptome reveals mechanisms of mango response to hot water treatment.芒果果皮转录组的从头组装揭示了芒果对热水处理的响应机制。
BMC Genomics. 2014 Nov 5;15(1):957. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-957.
3
Antifungal activity of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) against anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides) in postharvest mango fruit and its possible mechanisms of action.1-甲基环丙烯(1-MCP)对采后芒果果实炭疽病(胶孢炭疽菌)的抗真菌活性及其可能的作用机制。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2017 Jan 16;241:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
4
β-Aminobutyric Acid Priming Acquisition and Defense Response of Mango Fruit to Infection Based on Quantitative Proteomics.基于定量蛋白质组学的β-氨基丁酸引发芒果果实对侵染的获得和防御反应。
Cells. 2019 Sep 4;8(9):1029. doi: 10.3390/cells8091029.
5
In vitro antifungal activity of dimethyl trisulfide against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides from mango.二甲三硫醚对芒果炭疽病菌的体外抗真菌活性。
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019 Dec 12;36(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s11274-019-2781-z.
6
Transcriptome and proteome analysis of walnut (Juglans regia L.) fruit in response to infection by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides.转录组和蛋白质组分析胡桃(Juglans regia L.)果实对炭疽菌(Colletotrichum gloeosporioides)感染的反应。
BMC Plant Biol. 2021 May 31;21(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-03042-1.
7
Genome-wide identification and comparative expression analysis of NBS-LRR-encoding genes upon Colletotrichum gloeosporioides infection in two ecotypes of Fragaria vesca.在两个草莓生态型中鉴定 Colletotrichum gloeosporioides 感染后 NBS-LRR 编码基因的全基因组及比较表达分析。
Gene. 2013 Sep 15;527(1):215-27. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.06.008. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
8
Transcriptome Analysis of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) Fruit Epidermal Peel to Identify Putative Cuticle-Associated Genes.芒果(Mangifera indica L.)果皮转录组分析鉴定潜在的角质层相关基因
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 20;7:46163. doi: 10.1038/srep46163.
9
Glucanases and Chitinases in : Identification, Classification, Phylogeny, and Expression Analysis of Defense Genes against spp.几丁质酶和葡聚糖酶在: 防御基因对 spp. 的鉴定、分类、系统发育和表达分析
Molecules. 2024 Jul 28;29(15):3556. doi: 10.3390/molecules29153556.
10
Identification and Characterization of Colletotrichum Species Associated with Mango Anthracnose in Guangxi, China.鉴定和描述与中国广西芒果炭疽病相关的炭疽菌物种。
Plant Dis. 2018 Jul;102(7):1283-1289. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-09-17-1516-RE. Epub 2018 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Glucanases and Chitinases in : Identification, Classification, Phylogeny, and Expression Analysis of Defense Genes against spp.几丁质酶和葡聚糖酶在: 防御基因对 spp. 的鉴定、分类、系统发育和表达分析
Molecules. 2024 Jul 28;29(15):3556. doi: 10.3390/molecules29153556.
2
volatile organic compounds: efficacy against and of kiwifruit.挥发性有机化合物:对猕猴桃的防治效果及影响
Front Plant Sci. 2024 May 8;15:1398014. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1398014. eCollection 2024.
3
Co-expression network analysis and identification of core genes in the interaction between wheat and Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici.
小麦与条锈菌互作的共表达网络分析及核心基因鉴定
Arch Microbiol. 2024 May 2;206(5):241. doi: 10.1007/s00203-024-03925-5.
4
Transcriptomic Analysis of the Response of Susceptible and Resistant Bitter Melon ( L.) to Powdery Mildew Infection Revealing Complex Resistance via Multiple Signaling Pathways.转录组分析敏感和抗性苦瓜(L.)对白粉病感染的反应,揭示了通过多种信号通路的复杂抗性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Sep 19;24(18):14262. doi: 10.3390/ijms241814262.
5
Advances in sequencing and key character analysis of mango ( L.).芒果(L.)测序及关键性状分析进展
Hortic Res. 2022 Nov 21;10(2):uhac259. doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac259. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
The evolution of mini-chromosomes in the fungal genus .在真菌属中微型染色体的进化。
mBio. 2023 Aug 31;14(4):e0062923. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00629-23. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
7
Comparative transcriptome analysis provides novel insights into molecular response of salt-tolerant and sensitive polyembryonic mango genotypes to salinity stress at seedling stage.比较转录组分析为耐盐和敏感多胚芒果基因型在幼苗期对盐胁迫的分子反应提供了新的见解。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Apr 12;14:1152485. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1152485. eCollection 2023.
8
Comparative transcriptomics and genomic analyses reveal differential gene expression related to resistance in papaya ( L.).比较转录组学和基因组分析揭示了与番木瓜(Carica papaya L.)抗性相关的差异基因表达。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Dec 23;13:1038598. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1038598. eCollection 2022.
9
Comparative transcriptome profiling reveals the role of phytohormones and phenylpropanoid pathway in early-stage resistance against powdery mildew in watermelon ( L.).比较转录组分析揭示了植物激素和苯丙烷类途径在西瓜(Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai)对白粉病早期抗性中的作用。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Oct 20;13:1016822. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1016822. eCollection 2022.
10
Contrasting Roles of Ethylene Response Factors in Pathogen Response and Ripening in Fleshy Fruit.乙烯应答因子在肉质果实抗病与成熟中的差异作用
Cells. 2022 Aug 10;11(16):2484. doi: 10.3390/cells11162484.