Jones Meinir
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Imperial College, 1B Manresa Rd, London, SW3 6LR, UK.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015 Dec;15(12):73. doi: 10.1007/s11882-015-0575-4.
Laboratory animal workers face a high risk of developing laboratory animal allergy as a consequence of inhaling animal proteins at work; this has serious consequences for their health and future employment. Exposure to animal allergen remains to be the greatest risk factor although the relationship is complex, with attenuation at high allergen exposure. Recent evidence suggests that this may be due to a form of natural immunotolerance. Furthermore, the pattern of exposure to allergen may also be important in determining whether an allergic or a tolerant immune response is initiated. Risk associated with specific tasks in the laboratory need to be determined to provide evidence to devise a code of best practice for working within modern laboratory animal facilities. Recent evidence suggests that members of lipocalin allergens, such as Mus m 1, may act as immunomodulatory proteins, triggering innate immune receptors through toll-like receptors and promoting airway laboratory animal allergy. This highlights the need to understand the relationship between endotoxin, animal allergen and development of laboratory animal allergy to provide a safe working environment for all laboratory animal workers.
实验动物工作者由于在工作中吸入动物蛋白而面临患实验动物过敏症的高风险;这对他们的健康和未来就业会产生严重后果。尽管这种关系很复杂,在高过敏原暴露时会有所减轻,但接触动物过敏原仍然是最大的风险因素。最近的证据表明,这可能是由于一种自然免疫耐受形式。此外,过敏原的接触模式在决定引发过敏还是耐受免疫反应方面可能也很重要。需要确定实验室中特定任务相关的风险,以便为制定现代实验动物设施内的最佳操作规范提供证据。最近的证据表明,脂质运载蛋白过敏原家族成员,如小家鼠Mus m 1,可能作为免疫调节蛋白,通过Toll样受体触发先天免疫受体并促进气道实验动物过敏。这凸显了理解内毒素、动物过敏原与实验动物过敏症发展之间关系的必要性,以便为所有实验动物工作者提供一个安全的工作环境。