Matsuda Hisao, Parwani Abdul Shokor, Attanasio Philipp, Huemer Martin, Wutzler Alexander, Blaschke Florian, Haverkamp Wilhelm, Boldt Leif-Hendrik
Cardiology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Heart Vessels. 2016 Sep;31(9):1544-52. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0763-0. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
Catheter tissue contact force (CF) is an important factor for durable lesion formation during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). Since CF varies in the beating heart, atrial rhythm during RFCA may influence CF. A high-density map and RFCA points were obtained in 25 patients undergoing RFCA of AF using a CF-sensing catheter (Tacticath, St. Jude Medical). The operators were blinded to the CF information. Contact type was classified into three categories: constant, variable, and intermittent contact. Average CF and contact type were analyzed according to atrial rhythm (SR vs. AF) and anatomical location. A total of 1364 points (891 points during SR and 473 points during AF) were analyzed. Average CFs showed no significant difference between SR (17.2 ± 11.3 g) and AF (17.2 ± 13.3 g; p = 0.99). The distribution of points with an average CF of ≥20 and <10 g also showed no significant difference. However, the distribution of excessive CF (CF ≥40 g) was significantly higher during AF (7.4 %) in comparison with SR (4.2 %; p < 0.05). At the anterior area of the right inferior pulmonary vein (RIPV), the average CF during AF was significantly higher than during SR (p < 0.05). Constant contact was significantly higher during AF (32.2 %) when compared to SR (9.9 %; p < 0.01). Although the average CF was not different between atrial rhythms, constant contact was more often achievable during AF than it was during SR. However, excessive CF also seems to occur more frequently during AF especially at the anterior part of RIPV.
导管组织接触力(CF)是心房颤动(AF)射频导管消融(RFCA)期间形成持久损伤的重要因素。由于CF在跳动的心脏中会变化,RFCA期间的心房节律可能会影响CF。使用CF感知导管(Tacticath,圣犹达医疗公司)对25例接受AF射频消融的患者获取了高密度图和RFCA点。操作者对CF信息不知情。接触类型分为三类:持续、可变和间歇性接触。根据心房节律(窦性心律与房颤)和解剖位置分析平均CF和接触类型。共分析了1364个点(窦性心律期间891个点,房颤期间473个点)。窦性心律(17.2±11.3克)和房颤(17.2±13.3克;p = 0.99)之间的平均CF无显著差异。平均CF≥20克且<10克的点的分布也无显著差异。然而,与窦性心律(4.2%)相比,房颤期间过高CF(CF≥40克)的分布显著更高(7.4%;p<0.05)。在右下肺静脉(RIPV)前部区域,房颤期间的平均CF显著高于窦性心律期间(p<0.05)。与窦性心律(9.9%)相比,房颤期间持续接触显著更高(32.2%;p<0.01)。虽然心房节律之间的平均CF没有差异,但房颤期间比窦性心律期间更常实现持续接触。然而,过高CF似乎在房颤期间也更频繁发生,尤其是在RIPV前部。