Suppr超能文献

优化肺静脉隔离过程中的导管/组织接触:心房节律的影响。

Optimization of catheter/tissue contact during pulmonary vein isolation: the impact of atrial rhythm.

机构信息

Department of Heart and Vessels, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, University of Insubria, Viale Borri, 57, 2100 Varese, Italy.

出版信息

Europace. 2018 Feb 1;20(2):288-294. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw370.

Abstract

AIMS

During pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), even if operators are aware of the contact force (CF), its values may greatly vary and the impact of cardiac rhythm has not been thoroughly investigated yet. This study aims at assessing the actual values of CF, the applications with suboptimal CF, and the impact of cardiac rhythm on CF during PVI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty patients undergoing point-by-point PVI with a CF-sensing catheter were considered. CF target was between 6 and 40 g. The mean CF per application (mCF) was evaluated and considered suboptimal if ≤5 g. The real-time graphic of CF was also evaluated and classified as pulsatile if regular variations synchronous with the atrial rate were seen; otherwise it was irregular. To achieve PVI, 1458 applications were delivered; 287 (19.68%) had suboptimal mCF. A great variability of mCF was seen according to anatomy, operators and patients. Compared to applications in atrial fibrillation (AF), those in sinus rhythm (SR) showed a higher median value of mCF (11 vs. 9 g; P = 0.0099) and a lower percentage of suboptimal mCF (17.95% vs. 25.15%; P = 0.0051). Compared to the irregular, the pulsatile pattern, almost exclusively observed in SR, was associated with higher mCF (14.69 ± 8.77 vs. 10.79 ± 7.89 g; P < 0.0001) and fewer suboptimal applications (8.02% vs. 27.73%; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

During PVI, several factors influence CF, which, despite optimization attempts, can be suboptimal in ∼20% of the applications. However, CF is higher in SR than in AF and this is strictly associated with a pulsatile pattern of instant CF values.

摘要

目的

在肺静脉隔离(PVI)过程中,即使操作人员了解接触力(CF),其数值也可能有很大差异,而且心脏节律的影响尚未得到彻底研究。本研究旨在评估 CF 的实际值、CF 值不理想的应用以及 PVI 过程中心律对 CF 的影响。

方法和结果

共纳入 20 例行 PVI 的患者,应用 CF 感应导管,CF 目标值为 6-40g。评估每个应用的平均 CF(mCF),若 mCF≤5g 则认为不理想。还评估了 CF 的实时图形,如果看到与心房率同步的规则变化,则认为是脉动性的;否则则认为是不规则的。为了实现 PVI,共进行了 1458 次应用,其中 287 次(19.68%)mCF 不理想。根据解剖结构、操作人员和患者的不同,mCF 差异很大。与心房颤动(AF)应用相比,窦性节律(SR)的 mCF 中位数更高(11 比 9g;P=0.0099),mCF 不理想的比例更低(17.95%比 25.15%;P=0.0051)。与不规则图形相比,几乎仅在 SR 中观察到的脉动图形与较高的 mCF(14.69±8.77 比 10.79±7.89g;P<0.0001)和较少的不理想应用(8.02%比 27.73%;P<0.0001)相关。

结论

在 PVI 过程中,有几个因素会影响 CF,尽管进行了优化尝试,但仍有约 20%的应用中 CF 不理想。然而,SR 中的 CF 高于 AF,这与即时 CF 值的脉动模式密切相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验