• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药学质量的结构与过程方面:老年人的认知

The structural and process aspects of pharmacy quality: older adults' perceptions.

作者信息

Shiyanbola Olayinka O, Mott David A, Croes Kenneth D

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Feb;38(1):96-106. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0211-3.

DOI:10.1007/s11096-015-0211-3
PMID:26499502
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients are increasingly playing an active role in healthcare and their definitions of healthcare quality are becoming more important to understand. The Donabedian model has been used to understand patients’ perceptions of quality in healthcare settings including hospitals and nursing homes; no research has applied the model to understand patients’ perceptions of pharmacy quality.

OBJECTIVE

To describe older adults’ perception of a quality pharmacy including their expectations of a quality pharmacy and their preferences in a quality pharmacy.

SETTING

Six focus groups held in community centers and senior residence facilities in Wisconsin.

METHODS

The design was a descriptive, exploratory study. Participants were adults 65 years and older who filled a prescription at a community pharmacy in the 90 days prior to being contacted. Donabedian’s assessment of healthcare quality based on ‘structure,’ ‘process’ and ‘outcome’ was used to organize and categorize the focus group themes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The focus groups explored older adults’ perceptions and expectations of a quality pharmacy. The factors that influenced their pharmacy choice were also examined. Results The older adults’ description of a quality pharmacy was based on the ‘structure’ and ‘process’ domain of the Donabedian model. However, most responses were focused on the ‘process’ domains and related to the application of patient-centered care (e.g., pharmacist interaction and communication) versus the structure domains (e.g., staff availability). The most frequently reported factor in the choice of pharmacies was the pharmacy’s location with some participants also reporting that their relationship and rapport with the pharmacist were also important. Older adults’ expectations were focused on the ‘process’ features of quality, including the provision of medication-related information, and the pharmacist facilitating medication safety and medication adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

In describing pharmacy quality, older adults mostly refer to the ‘process’ aspects of quality. Older adults perceive a quality pharmacy as one where the pharmacist provides patient-centered care. While location is important in pharmacy choices, the pharmacist’s patient-centeredness, and the quality features of the pharmacy are also relevant. Older adults’ expectations were related to their perception of a quality pharmacy. Pharmacists should publicize their pharmacies’ ‘process’ features in quality reporting systems.

摘要

背景

患者在医疗保健中发挥的积极作用日益增强,了解他们对医疗质量的定义变得越发重要。多纳贝迪安模型已被用于理解患者对包括医院和疗养院在内的医疗环境中质量的看法;尚无研究应用该模型来理解患者对药房质量的看法。

目的

描述老年人对优质药房的认知,包括他们对优质药房的期望以及在优质药房方面的偏好。

地点

在威斯康星州的社区中心和老年居住设施中举行了六个焦点小组。

方法

该设计为描述性探索性研究。参与者为65岁及以上的成年人,他们在被联系前的90天内在社区药房配过药。基于“结构”“过程”和“结果”的多纳贝迪安医疗质量评估用于组织和分类焦点小组主题。

主要结局指标

焦点小组探讨了老年人对优质药房的认知和期望。还研究了影响他们选择药房的因素。结果老年人对优质药房的描述基于多纳贝迪安模型的“结构”和“过程”领域。然而,大多数回答集中在“过程”领域,且与以患者为中心的护理应用(如药剂师互动和沟通)相关,而非结构领域(如工作人员可用性)。在选择药房时最常报告的因素是药房的位置,一些参与者还报告称他们与药剂师的关系和融洽程度也很重要。老年人的期望集中在质量的“过程”特征上,包括提供与药物相关的信息,以及药剂师促进用药安全和药物依从性。

结论

在描述药房质量时,老年人大多提及质量的“过程”方面。老年人将优质药房视为药剂师提供以患者为中心护理的药房。虽然位置在药房选择中很重要,但药剂师以患者为中心的程度以及药房的质量特征也很相关。老年人的期望与他们对优质药房的认知有关。药剂师应在质量报告系统中宣传其药房的“过程”特征。

相似文献

1
The structural and process aspects of pharmacy quality: older adults' perceptions.药学质量的结构与过程方面:老年人的认知
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Feb;38(1):96-106. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0211-3.
2
Using the Consumer Experience with Pharmacy Services Survey as a quality metric for ambulatory care pharmacies: older adults' perspectives.将药房服务消费者体验调查用作门诊护理药房的质量指标:老年人的观点。
BMJ Open. 2016 May 26;6(5):e011241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011241.
3
Construct identification and measure development for investigating pharmacist-patient relationships.用于研究药剂师与患者关系的构念识别与量表开发。
Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Nov;51(3):229-38. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00222-7.
4
Testing a pharmacist-patient relationship quality model among older persons with diabetes.在老年糖尿病患者中测试药剂师-患者关系质量模型。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2006 Mar;2(1):1-21. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2005.12.006.
5
Perceptions of patients on Medicare Part D medication therapy management services.医疗保险D部分药物治疗管理服务的患者认知
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009 May-Jun;49(3):392-8. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2009.08008.
6
Advancing the use of community pharmacy quality measures: a qualitative study.推进社区药房质量措施的使用:一项定性研究。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2013 Jul-Aug;53(4):400-7. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2013.12160.
7
Patient preferences for objective quality metrics during community pharmacy selection: A discrete choice experiment.患者在选择社区药店时对客观质量指标的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Jun;15(6):641-649. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
8
Design of a medication therapy management program for Medicare beneficiaries: qualitative findings from patients and physicians.为医疗保险受益人设计药物治疗管理计划:来自患者和医生的定性研究结果
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2012 Apr;10(2):129-38. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
9
Med Wise: A theory-based program to improve older adults' communication with pharmacists about their medicines.明智用药:一个基于理论的项目,旨在改善老年人与药剂师就其药物进行的沟通。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2016 Jul-Aug;12(4):569-77. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2015.09.010. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
10
Are community-based pharmacists underused in the care of persons living with HIV? A need for structural and policy changes.社区药剂师在艾滋病毒感染者护理中是否未得到充分利用?需要进行结构和政策变革。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2015 Jan-Feb;55(1):19-30. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2015.14107.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a quality framework for community pharmacy: a systematic review of international literature.制定社区药店质量框架:国际文献的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 15;14(2):e079820. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079820.
2
Patient Willingness to Use a Pharmacy-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Service: A National Survey of U.S. Adults.美国成年人基于药房的结直肠癌筛查服务使用意愿的全国性调查。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Jan 9;33(1):63-71. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0763.
3
Challenges encountered by pharmacy staff in using prescription medication labels during medication counselling with older adults and solutions employed: A mixed-methods study.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' perceived value of pharmacy quality measures: a mixed-methods study.患者对药学质量措施的感知价值:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 19;5(1):e006086. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006086.
2
Australian community pharmacy services: a survey of what people with chronic conditions and their carers use versus what they consider important.澳大利亚社区药房服务:慢性病患者及其护理人员的实际使用情况与他们认为重要的服务内容的调查。
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 8;4(12):e006587. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006587.
3
How to attract them and keep them: the pharmacy attributes that matter to Australian residents with chronic conditions.
药房工作人员在为老年人提供用药咨询时使用处方药标签所遇到的挑战及采取的解决办法:一项混合方法研究。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023 Jan 20;9:100226. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100226. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Understanding and expectation towards pharmaceutical care among patients, caregivers and pharmacy service providers: a qualitative study.患者、照料者和药剂师对药学服务的认知和期望:一项定性研究。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2020 Jan;27(1):25-30. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-001415. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
5
Using the Consumer Experience with Pharmacy Services Survey as a quality metric for ambulatory care pharmacies: older adults' perspectives.将药房服务消费者体验调查用作门诊护理药房的质量指标:老年人的观点。
BMJ Open. 2016 May 26;6(5):e011241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011241.
如何吸引并留住他们:对患有慢性病的澳大利亚居民至关重要的药房属性。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2014 Aug;22(4):238-45. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12075. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
4
Advancing the use of community pharmacy quality measures: a qualitative study.推进社区药房质量措施的使用:一项定性研究。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2013 Jul-Aug;53(4):400-7. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2013.12160.
5
Characterizing healthcare quality in the community pharmacy setting: insights from a focus group study.社区药店环境下的医疗保健质量特征:来自焦点小组研究的见解。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2012 Sep-Oct;8(5):360-70. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2011.09.001. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
6
The values and value of patient-centered care.以患者为中心的护理的价值观与价值
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;9(2):100-3. doi: 10.1370/afm.1239.
7
Structure, process or outcome: which contributes most to patients' overall assessment of healthcare quality?结构、过程还是结果:哪个对患者对医疗保健质量的整体评估贡献最大?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Apr;20(4):326-31. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.042358. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
8
What is quality anyway? Performance reports that clearly communicate to consumers the meaning of quality of care.质量到底是什么?绩效报告能向消费者清楚地传达护理质量的含义。
Med Care Res Rev. 2010 Jun;67(3):275-93. doi: 10.1177/1077558709356300. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
9
Use of prescription and over-the-counter medications and dietary supplements among older adults in the United States.美国老年人使用处方药、非处方药和膳食补充剂的情况。
JAMA. 2008 Dec 24;300(24):2867-78. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.892.
10
Pharmacy patronage: identifying key factors in the decision making process using the determinant attribute approach.药房光顾:使用决定因素属性方法识别决策过程中的关键因素。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2008 Jan-Feb;48(1):71-85. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2008.07014.