Gardiner Stuart K, Boey Pui Yi, Yang Hongli, Fortune Brad, Burgoyne Claude F, Demirel Shaban
Devers Eye Institute Legacy Health, Portland, Oregon, United States.
Singapore National Eye Center, Singapore.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Oct;56(11):6886-91. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-16701.
Minimum rim width (MRW) and area (MRA) have been introduced as anatomically defensible measures of neuroretinal rim tissue observable using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT). They have been reported to change earlier than retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) in glaucoma. This study sought to determine which is better to distinguish subsequent change from variability, using the previously described longitudinal signal-to-noise ratio (LSNR).
Data from 157 eyes of 157 participants with high-risk ocular hypertension or non-end-stage glaucoma (mean deviation [MD] from -22 to +3 dB) were used. Participants were tested approximately every 6 months for at least six visits. For each eye, MRW, MRA, and RNFLT were regressed linearly against time. Longitudinal signal-to-noise ratio for each eye was defined as the rate of change over time (signal) divided by the standard deviation of residuals from this trend (noise). These were compared between parameters using a Wilcoxon signed rank test.
The median LSNRs were -0.58y⁻¹ for RNFLT (bootstrapped 95% confidence interval -0.69 to -0.48y⁻¹); -0.44y⁻¹ (-0.59 to -0.32y⁻¹) for MRW; and -0.23y⁻¹ (-0.32 to -0.08y⁻¹) for MRA. Longitudinal signal-to-noise ratios were significantly more negative for RNFLT than for MRW (P = 0.025) or for MRA (P < 0.001).
Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by SDOCT had a better LSNR than MRW or MRA. Although MRW and MRA may be more sensitive for early detection of glaucomatous damage, these data suggest that RNFLT may be preferable for monitoring change.
最小视盘边缘宽度(MRW)和面积(MRA)已被引入作为可通过光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SDOCT)观察到的神经视网膜视盘边缘组织的解剖学上合理的测量指标。据报道,在青光眼患者中,它们比视网膜神经纤维层厚度(RNFLT)更早发生变化。本研究旨在使用先前描述的纵向信噪比(LSNR)来确定哪一个指标在区分后续变化与变异性方面更优。
使用了157例高危高眼压症或非终末期青光眼患者(平均偏差[MD]从-22至+3 dB)的157只眼睛的数据。参与者大约每6个月接受一次测试,至少进行6次就诊。对于每只眼睛,将MRW、MRA和RNFLT与时间进行线性回归。每只眼睛的纵向信噪比定义为随时间的变化率(信号)除以该趋势残差的标准差(噪声)。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验在各参数之间进行比较。
RNFLT的LSNR中位数为-0.58y⁻¹(自展95%置信区间为-0.69至-0.48y⁻¹);MRW为-0.44y⁻¹(-0.59至-0.32y⁻¹);MRA为-0.23y⁻¹(-0.32至-0.08y⁻¹)。RNFLT的纵向信噪比显著低于MRW(P = 0.025)或MRA(P < 0.001)。
通过SDOCT测量的视网膜神经纤维层厚度的LSNR优于MRW或MRA。尽管MRW和MRA可能对青光眼性损害的早期检测更敏感,但这些数据表明RNFLT可能更适合用于监测变化。