Emir S, Aydin M, Can G, Bali I, Yildirim O, Öznur M, Yildiz Z D, Sözen S, Gürel A
Department of General Surgery, Namik Kemal University, Faculty of Medicine, Tekirdağ, Turkey.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015 Oct;19(19):3613-8.
Cancer-related inflammation affects many aspects of malignancy, including proliferation and survival of malignant cells, angiogenesis, and therapeutic response. Some biomarkers representing the degree of systemic inflammation, such as the Glasgow prognostic score, NLR and PLR, have been shown to have prognostic value in many kinds of cancer patients. Aim of this study to investigate to compare neutrophil/leukocyte (NLR) and platelet/lymphocyte (PLR) ratios of the patients with colorectal neoplastic polyps and colorectal cancer (CRC) and tried to determine whether this could be used as a biomarker in follow up of the patients with neoplastic polyps.
A total of 100 colorectal polyps, 113 colorectal cancers and 124 healthy controls were included in the study. Exculusion criteria were endocrinologic or metabolic diseases, acute or chronic diseases, hypertension and atherosclerotic heart diseases, renal diseases. Blood count parameters of the patients were measured. The NLR was calculated as a simple ratio between the absolute neutrophil and the absolute lymphocyte counts. The PLR was defined as the platelet counts to lymphocyte ratio.
A statistically significant difference was not detected between Group A and C with regard to NLR and PLR. NLR and PLR were found statistically significantly high in Group B (CRC), Group A (colorectal polyp) and Group C (healthy individuals) (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Our study showed that the optimum NLR cut-off point for neoplastic polyps was 2.28 (sensitivity: 68.7%, specificity: 42.3%). When the sensitivity and specificity levels of the PLR were assessed, they were 68.7% and 46.5% for neoplastic polyps, 80% and 68.9% for colorectal cancer.
NLR and PLR may be used for follow up conversion of colonic and rectal neoplastic polyps to invasive tumor.
癌症相关炎症影响恶性肿瘤的许多方面,包括恶性细胞的增殖和存活、血管生成以及治疗反应。一些代表全身炎症程度的生物标志物,如格拉斯哥预后评分、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR),已被证明在多种癌症患者中具有预后价值。本研究旨在比较结直肠肿瘤性息肉患者与结直肠癌(CRC)患者的中性粒细胞/白细胞(NLR)和血小板/淋巴细胞(PLR)比值,并试图确定这是否可作为肿瘤性息肉患者随访中的生物标志物。
本研究共纳入100例结直肠息肉患者、113例结直肠癌患者和124例健康对照者。排除标准为内分泌或代谢性疾病、急慢性疾病、高血压和动脉粥样硬化性心脏病、肾脏疾病。测量患者的血细胞计数参数。NLR计算为绝对中性粒细胞计数与绝对淋巴细胞计数之间的简单比值。PLR定义为血小板计数与淋巴细胞比值。
A组和C组在NLR和PLR方面未检测到统计学上的显著差异。B组(CRC)、A组(结直肠息肉)和C组(健康个体)的NLR和PLR在统计学上显著升高(p < 0.001和p < 0.001)。我们的研究表明,肿瘤性息肉的最佳NLR切点为2.28(敏感性:68.7%,特异性:42.3%)。评估PLR的敏感性和特异性水平时,肿瘤性息肉分别为68.7%和46.5%,结直肠癌分别为80%和68.9%。
NLR和PLR可用于随访结肠和直肠肿瘤性息肉向侵袭性肿瘤的转变。