Suppr超能文献

创伤性脑损伤患者在压力控制和压力调节容量控制通气期间的颅内压:一项随机交叉试验。

Intracranial Pressure During Pressure Control and Pressure-Regulated Volume Control Ventilation in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Crossover trial.

作者信息

Schirmer-Mikalsen Kari, Vik Anne, Skogvoll Eirik, Moen Kent Gøran, Solheim Ole, Klepstad Pål

机构信息

Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, St. Olav University Hospital, Pb 3250 Sluppen, 7006, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Neurocrit Care. 2016 Jun;24(3):332-41. doi: 10.1007/s12028-015-0208-8.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Mechanical ventilation with control of partial arterial CO2 pressures (PaCO2) is used to treat or stabilize intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) is a ventilator mode where inspiratory pressures are automatically adjusted to deliver the patient a pre-set stable tidal volume (TV). This may result in a more stable PaCO2 and thus a more stable ICP compared with conventional pressure control (PC) ventilation. The aim of this study was to compare PC and PRVC ventilation in TBI patients with respect to ICP and PaCO2.

METHODS

This is a randomized crossover trial including eleven patients with a moderate or severe TBI who were mechanically ventilated and had ICP monitoring. Each patient was administered alternating 2-h periods of PC and PRVC ventilation. The outcome variables were ICP and PaCO2.

RESULTS

Fifty-two (26 PC, 26 PRVC) study periods were included. Mean ICP was 10.8 mmHg with PC and 10.3 mmHg with PRVC ventilation (p = 0.38). Mean PaCO2 was 36.5 mmHg (4.87 kPa) with PC and 36.1 mmHg (4.81 kPa) with PRVC (p = 0.38). There were less fluctuations in ICP (p = 0.02) and PaCO2 (p = 0.05) with PRVC ventilation.

CONCLUSIONS

Mean ICP and PaCO2 were similar for PC and PRVC ventilation in TBI patients, but PRVC ventilation resulted in less fluctuation in both ICP and PaCO2. We cannot exclude that the two ventilatory modes would have impact on ICP in patients with higher ICP values; however, the similar PaCO2 observations argue against this.

摘要

引言

通过控制动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)进行机械通气,用于治疗或稳定创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的颅内压(ICP)。压力调节容量控制(PRVC)是一种通气模式,吸气压力会自动调整,以便为患者输送预设的稳定潮气量(TV)。与传统压力控制(PC)通气相比,这可能会使PaCO2更稳定,从而使ICP更稳定。本研究的目的是比较TBI患者采用PC通气和PRVC通气时的ICP和PaCO2。

方法

这是一项随机交叉试验,纳入了11例中度或重度TBI且接受机械通气并进行ICP监测的患者。每位患者交替接受2小时的PC通气和PRVC通气。观察指标为ICP和PaCO2。

结果

共纳入52个(26个PC通气时段、26个PRVC通气时段)研究时段。PC通气时平均ICP为10.8 mmHg,PRVC通气时为10.3 mmHg(p = 0.38)。PC通气时平均PaCO2为36.5 mmHg(4.87 kPa),PRVC通气时为36.1 mmHg(4.81 kPa)(p = 0.38)。PRVC通气时ICP(p = 0.02)和PaCO2(p = 0.05)的波动较小。

结论

TBI患者采用PC通气和PRVC通气时,平均ICP和PaCO2相似,但PRVC通气使ICP和PaCO2的波动更小。我们不能排除这两种通气模式对ICP值较高的患者的ICP有影响;然而,PaCO2的相似观察结果不支持这一点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验