Suppr超能文献

两种通气模式用于创伤性脑损伤患者通气时呼吸与血流动力学稳定性的比较:压力调节容量控制与同步间歇机械通气

Comparison of respiratory and hemodynamic stability in patients with traumatic brain injury ventilated by two ventilator modes: Pressure regulated volume control versus synchronized intermittent mechanical ventilation.

作者信息

Aghadavoudi Omid, Alikiaii Babak, Sadeghi Fariba

机构信息

Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

Adv Biomed Res. 2016 Nov 28;5:175. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.190991. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare pressure regulated volume control (PRVC) and synchronized intermittent mechanical ventilation (SIMV) modes of ventilation according to respiratory and hemodynamic stability in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a randomized, single-blinded, clinical trial study, 100 patients who hospitalized in ICU due to TBI were selected and randomly divided into two groups. The first and second groups were ventilated by PRVC and SIMV modes, respectively. During mechanical ventilation, arterial blood gas and respiratory and hemodynamic parameters were also recorded and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

According to the -test, the mean rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) after the first 8 h of mechanical ventilation was significantly higher in SIMV group compared with PRVC group (107.6 ± 2.75 vs. 102.2 ± 5.2, respectively, < 0.0001). Further, according to ANOVA with repeated measures, the trend of RSBI changes had a significant difference between the two groups ( < 0.001). The trend of ratio of partial pressure arterial oxygen and fraction of inspired oxygen was different between the two groups according to Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Using PRVC mode might be more desirable than using SIMV mode in patients with TBI due to better stability of ventilation and oxygenating. To ensure for more advantages of PRVC mode, further studies with longer follow-up and more detailed measurements are recommended.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在根据入住重症监护病房(ICU)的创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的呼吸和血流动力学稳定性,比较压力调节容量控制(PRVC)和同步间歇机械通气(SIMV)两种通气模式。

材料与方法

在一项随机、单盲临床试验研究中,选取100例因TBI入住ICU的患者,并随机分为两组。第一组和第二组分别采用PRVC和SIMV模式进行通气。在机械通气期间,还记录并比较两组的动脉血气以及呼吸和血流动力学参数。

结果

根据t检验,机械通气开始8小时后,SIMV组的平均快速浅呼吸指数(RSBI)显著高于PRVC组(分别为107.6±2.75和102.2±5.2,P<0.0001)。此外,根据重复测量方差分析,两组RSBI变化趋势有显著差异(P<0.001)。根据曼-惠特尼-威尔科克森检验,两组的动脉血氧分压与吸入氧分数之比的变化趋势不同(P<0.001)。

结论

对于TBI患者,使用PRVC模式可能比使用SIMV模式更可取,因为其通气和氧合稳定性更好。为确保PRVC模式有更多优势,建议进行随访时间更长、测量更详细的进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5f/5156968/51c7bd38dbcf/ABR-5-175-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验