• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种通气模式用于创伤性脑损伤患者通气时呼吸与血流动力学稳定性的比较:压力调节容量控制与同步间歇机械通气

Comparison of respiratory and hemodynamic stability in patients with traumatic brain injury ventilated by two ventilator modes: Pressure regulated volume control versus synchronized intermittent mechanical ventilation.

作者信息

Aghadavoudi Omid, Alikiaii Babak, Sadeghi Fariba

机构信息

Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

Adv Biomed Res. 2016 Nov 28;5:175. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.190991. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.4103/2277-9175.190991
PMID:28028515
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5156968/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare pressure regulated volume control (PRVC) and synchronized intermittent mechanical ventilation (SIMV) modes of ventilation according to respiratory and hemodynamic stability in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a randomized, single-blinded, clinical trial study, 100 patients who hospitalized in ICU due to TBI were selected and randomly divided into two groups. The first and second groups were ventilated by PRVC and SIMV modes, respectively. During mechanical ventilation, arterial blood gas and respiratory and hemodynamic parameters were also recorded and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

According to the -test, the mean rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) after the first 8 h of mechanical ventilation was significantly higher in SIMV group compared with PRVC group (107.6 ± 2.75 vs. 102.2 ± 5.2, respectively, < 0.0001). Further, according to ANOVA with repeated measures, the trend of RSBI changes had a significant difference between the two groups ( < 0.001). The trend of ratio of partial pressure arterial oxygen and fraction of inspired oxygen was different between the two groups according to Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Using PRVC mode might be more desirable than using SIMV mode in patients with TBI due to better stability of ventilation and oxygenating. To ensure for more advantages of PRVC mode, further studies with longer follow-up and more detailed measurements are recommended.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在根据入住重症监护病房(ICU)的创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的呼吸和血流动力学稳定性,比较压力调节容量控制(PRVC)和同步间歇机械通气(SIMV)两种通气模式。

材料与方法

在一项随机、单盲临床试验研究中,选取100例因TBI入住ICU的患者,并随机分为两组。第一组和第二组分别采用PRVC和SIMV模式进行通气。在机械通气期间,还记录并比较两组的动脉血气以及呼吸和血流动力学参数。

结果

根据t检验,机械通气开始8小时后,SIMV组的平均快速浅呼吸指数(RSBI)显著高于PRVC组(分别为107.6±2.75和102.2±5.2,P<0.0001)。此外,根据重复测量方差分析,两组RSBI变化趋势有显著差异(P<0.001)。根据曼-惠特尼-威尔科克森检验,两组的动脉血氧分压与吸入氧分数之比的变化趋势不同(P<0.001)。

结论

对于TBI患者,使用PRVC模式可能比使用SIMV模式更可取,因为其通气和氧合稳定性更好。为确保PRVC模式有更多优势,建议进行随访时间更长、测量更详细的进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5f/5156968/8a6aacc69b74/ABR-5-175-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5f/5156968/51c7bd38dbcf/ABR-5-175-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5f/5156968/f1fa5038fc37/ABR-5-175-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5f/5156968/408301a63309/ABR-5-175-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5f/5156968/5f80b030f2bb/ABR-5-175-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5f/5156968/17182f5ffc34/ABR-5-175-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5f/5156968/848f0ca820bc/ABR-5-175-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5f/5156968/9727b250af45/ABR-5-175-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5f/5156968/8a6aacc69b74/ABR-5-175-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5f/5156968/51c7bd38dbcf/ABR-5-175-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5f/5156968/f1fa5038fc37/ABR-5-175-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5f/5156968/408301a63309/ABR-5-175-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5f/5156968/5f80b030f2bb/ABR-5-175-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5f/5156968/17182f5ffc34/ABR-5-175-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5f/5156968/848f0ca820bc/ABR-5-175-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5f/5156968/9727b250af45/ABR-5-175-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5f/5156968/8a6aacc69b74/ABR-5-175-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of respiratory and hemodynamic stability in patients with traumatic brain injury ventilated by two ventilator modes: Pressure regulated volume control versus synchronized intermittent mechanical ventilation.两种通气模式用于创伤性脑损伤患者通气时呼吸与血流动力学稳定性的比较:压力调节容量控制与同步间歇机械通气
Adv Biomed Res. 2016 Nov 28;5:175. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.190991. eCollection 2016.
2
Pressure-regulated volume control ventilation vs synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation for very low-birth-weight infants: a randomized controlled trial.压力调节容量控制通气与同步间歇指令通气用于极低出生体重儿的比较:一项随机对照试验
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 Sep;159(9):868-75. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.9.868.
3
Influence of different ventilator modes on Vo(2) and Vco(2) measurements using a compact metabolic monitor.使用紧凑型代谢监测仪时不同通气模式对 Vo(2)和 Vco(2)测量的影响。
Nutrition. 2009 Nov-Dec;25(11-12):1106-14. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2009.01.018. Epub 2009 Jun 7.
4
Effect of ventilator mode on patient-ventilator synchrony and work of breathing in neonatal pigs.通气模式对新生猪患者-呼吸机同步性及呼吸功的影响。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017 Jul;52(7):922-928. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23682. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
5
A comparison of synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation and pressure-regulated volume control ventilation in elderly patients with acute exacerbations of COPD and respiratory failure.同步间歇指令通气与压力调节容量控制通气在老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期合并呼吸衰竭患者中的比较
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 May 17;11:1023-9. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S99156. eCollection 2016.
6
Intracranial Pressure During Pressure Control and Pressure-Regulated Volume Control Ventilation in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Crossover trial.创伤性脑损伤患者在压力控制和压力调节容量控制通气期间的颅内压:一项随机交叉试验。
Neurocrit Care. 2016 Jun;24(3):332-41. doi: 10.1007/s12028-015-0208-8.
7
[Clinical application of adaptive minute ventilation + IntelliCycle ventilation mode in patients with mild-to-moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome].适应性分钟通气量+智能循环通气模式在轻至中度急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中的临床应用
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Jan;32(1):20-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20191012-00004.
8
Comparison of adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized clinical trial.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中自适应支持通气与同步间歇指令通气的比较:一项随机临床试验。
J Res Med Sci. 2022 Jan 29;27:6. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_905_18. eCollection 2022.
9
Synchronized mechanical ventilation for respiratory support in newborn infants.新生儿呼吸支持的同步机械通气
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD000456. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000456.pub3.
10
A comparison of the effects of assist-control, SIMV, and SIMV with pressure support on ventilation, oxygen consumption, and ventilatory equivalent.辅助控制通气、同步间歇指令通气以及同步间歇指令通气加压力支持对通气、氧耗量和通气当量影响的比较。
Heart Lung. 1995 Jan-Feb;24(1):67-75. doi: 10.1016/s0147-9563(05)80097-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Volume Support, Volume-Assured Pressure Support, and Spontaneous Modes in Postoperative Early Extubated Patients.术后早期拔管患者中容量支持、容量保证压力支持和自主呼吸模式的比较
Adv Biomed Res. 2022 Nov 28;11:99. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_27_21. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparison of pressure-regulated volume control ventilation and pressure control ventilation in patients with abdominal compartment syndrome.腹腔间隔室综合征患者压力调节容量控制通气与压力控制通气的比较
Exp Ther Med. 2019 Mar;17(3):1952-1958. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7157. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Intracranial Pressure During Pressure Control and Pressure-Regulated Volume Control Ventilation in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Crossover trial.创伤性脑损伤患者在压力控制和压力调节容量控制通气期间的颅内压:一项随机交叉试验。
Neurocrit Care. 2016 Jun;24(3):332-41. doi: 10.1007/s12028-015-0208-8.
2
A randomized controlled trial of adaptive support ventilation mode to wean patients after fast-track cardiac valvular surgery.一项关于适应性支持通气模式在快速心脏瓣膜手术后患者脱机中的应用的随机对照试验。
Anesthesiology. 2015 Apr;122(4):832-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000589.
3
Adaptive support ventilation versus synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation with pressure support in weaning patients after orthotopic liver transplantation.
原位肝移植术后撤机患者中适应性支持通气与压力支持同步间歇指令通气的比较
Transplant Proc. 2014 Sep;46(7):2272-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.06.046. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
4
Is pressure-regulated volume control mode appropriate for severely obstructed patients?压力调节容量控制模式适用于严重气道阻塞患者吗?
J Crit Care. 2014 Dec;29(6):1041-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
5
Pressure versus volume controlled modes in invasive mechanical ventilation.压力控制与容量控制通气模式在有创机械通气中的应用
Med Intensiva. 2013 May;37(4):292-8. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
6
Weaning from mechanical ventilation: why are we still looking for alternative methods?机械通气的撤机:为何我们仍在寻找替代方法?
Med Intensiva. 2013 Dec;37(9):605-17. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2012.08.008. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
7
Pressure modes of invasive mechanical ventilation.有创机械通气的压力模式
South Med J. 2011 Oct;104(10):701-9. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31822da7fa.
8
Comparison of two ventilation modes in post-cardiac surgical patients.心脏手术后患者两种通气模式的比较
Saudi J Anaesth. 2011 Apr;5(2):173-8. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.82790.
9
Mechanical ventilation with lung protective strategies: what works?机械通气联合肺保护性策略:什么方法有效?
Crit Care Clin. 2011 Jul;27(3):469-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2011.05.008.
10
Work of breathing in adaptive pressure control continuous mandatory ventilation.适应性压力控制持续强制通气时的呼吸功。
Respir Care. 2009 Nov;54(11):1467-72.