Hallam M J, Reid J M, Cooperberg P L
Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989 May;152(5):1101-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.152.5.1101.
Color-flow Doppler is a useful adjunct in duplex sonography of peripheral vessels. This study was undertaken to see if color-flow Doppler could give semiquantitative information about the degree of stenosis at the origin of the internal carotid artery. The factors evaluated on color flow are the width of the lumen as estimated from the color-flow image relative to the width of the vessel, the degree of turbulence (evidenced by the mosaic pattern), and the pulse-repetition frequency necessary to prevent aliasing. A double-blind comparison with conventional duplex scanning in 146 carotid bifurcations in 74 patients was carried out. In 91%, the color-flow assessment was in complete agreement with the duplex assessment. In the remaining 9%, the color flow differed from the duplex by only one stenosis group, and the distributions of over- and under-estimation were equal. These results showed comparable assessment of the degree of stenosis with conventional duplex and color Doppler technology.
彩色多普勒血流成像在外周血管双功超声检查中是一种有用的辅助手段。本研究旨在探讨彩色多普勒血流成像能否提供关于颈内动脉起始处狭窄程度的半定量信息。通过彩色血流评估的因素包括:从彩色血流图像估计的管腔宽度相对于血管宽度、湍流程度(由镶嵌模式证明)以及防止混叠所需的脉冲重复频率。对74例患者的146个颈动脉分叉处进行了彩色多普勒血流成像与传统双功扫描的双盲比较。91%的情况下,彩色血流评估与双功超声评估完全一致。在其余9%的情况下,彩色血流与双功超声的差异仅为一个狭窄分级,高估和低估的分布相等。这些结果表明,传统双功超声和彩色多普勒技术对狭窄程度的评估具有可比性。