Suppr超能文献

未固定参考、单眼遮挡与发育性阅读障碍——一篇评论

Unfixed reference, monocular occlusion, and developmental dyslexia--a critique.

作者信息

Bishop D V

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Manchester.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 1989 Mar;73(3):209-15. doi: 10.1136/bjo.73.3.209.

Abstract

Stein and Fowler have proposed that poor binocular control of vergence eye movements is responsible for reading problems in a subset of dyslexic children, and that this subgroup is characterised by unstable performance on Dunlop's reference eye test. Four predictions from this hypothesis are evaluated in the light of published evidence. First, it is shown that a substantial minority of good readers have unfixed reference. Second, the evidence for a raised prevalence of unfixed reference in dyslexics is reviewed and contradictory findings are discussed. Third, it is argued that there is little support for the view that dyslexics with unfixed reference make different types of reading errors from those with fixed reference: indeed many dyslexics with unfixed reference have non-visual, phonological difficulties. Finally, it is argued that studies which claim that monocular occlusion is a successful treatment for 'visual dyslexia' are methodologically flawed and do not provide convincing evidence for this view.

摘要

斯坦因和福勒提出,双眼聚散眼球运动控制不佳是导致一部分诵读困难儿童阅读问题的原因,并且这一亚组儿童的特征是在邓洛普参考眼测试中表现不稳定。根据已发表的证据对这一假设的四个预测进行了评估。第一,研究表明相当一部分阅读能力良好的人也有不稳定的参考值。第二,回顾了诵读困难者中不稳定参考值患病率升高的证据,并讨论了相互矛盾的研究结果。第三,有人认为,几乎没有证据支持这样一种观点,即参考值不稳定的诵读困难者与参考值稳定的诵读困难者会犯不同类型的阅读错误:事实上,许多参考值不稳定的诵读困难者存在非视觉、语音方面的困难。最后,有人认为,那些声称单眼遮挡是治疗“视觉诵读困难”的成功方法的研究在方法上存在缺陷,并没有为这一观点提供令人信服的证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验