• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用词联想数据估计情感词协变量。

Estimating affective word covariates using word association data.

作者信息

Van Rensbergen Bram, De Deyne Simon, Storms Gert

机构信息

Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven, Tiensestraat 102 B3711, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

Computational Cognitive Science Laboratory, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2016 Dec;48(4):1644-1652. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0680-2.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-015-0680-2
PMID:26511372
Abstract

Word ratings on affective dimensions are an important tool in psycholinguistic research. Traditionally, they are obtained by asking participants to rate words on each dimension, a time-consuming procedure. As such, there has been some interest in computationally generating norms, by extrapolating words' affective ratings using their semantic similarity to words for which these values are already known. So far, most attempts have derived similarity from word co-occurrence in text corpora. In the current paper, we obtain similarity from word association data. We use these similarity ratings to predict the valence, arousal, and dominance of 14,000 Dutch words with the help of two extrapolation methods: Orientation towards Paradigm Words and k-Nearest Neighbors. The resulting estimates show very high correlations with human ratings when using Orientation towards Paradigm Words, and even higher correlations when using k-Nearest Neighbors. We discuss possible theoretical accounts of our results and compare our findings with previous attempts at computationally generating affective norms.

摘要

情感维度上的词汇评级是心理语言学研究中的一项重要工具。传统上,这些评级是通过要求参与者对每个维度的词汇进行评级来获得的,这是一个耗时的过程。因此,人们对通过计算生成规范产生了一些兴趣,即利用单词与已知情感评级的单词之间的语义相似性来推断单词的情感评级。到目前为止,大多数尝试都是从文本语料库中的单词共现中得出相似性的。在本文中,我们从单词联想数据中获取相似性。我们使用这些相似性评级,借助两种推断方法:范式词导向法和k近邻法,来预测14000个荷兰语单词的效价、唤醒度和支配性。当使用范式词导向法时,所得估计值与人类评级显示出非常高的相关性,而使用k近邻法时相关性更高。我们讨论了对结果的可能理论解释,并将我们的发现与之前计算生成情感规范的尝试进行了比较。

相似文献

1
Estimating affective word covariates using word association data.利用词联想数据估计情感词协变量。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Dec;48(4):1644-1652. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0680-2.
2
Reproducing affective norms with lexical co-occurrence statistics: Predicting valence, arousal, and dominance.利用词汇共现统计重现情感规范:预测效价、唤醒度和支配性。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(8):1584-98. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.941296. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
3
ANGST: affective norms for German sentiment terms, derived from the affective norms for English words.ANGST:德语情感词汇的情感规范,源自英语单词的情感规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Dec;46(4):1108-18. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0426-y.
4
The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Extrapolating affective values for 38,000+ Chinese words via a computational model.善、恶与矛盾情感:通过计算模型推断38000多个中文词汇的情感价值。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):5386-5405. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02274-3. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
5
The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales.格拉斯哥规范:9 个尺度上对 5500 个单词的评分。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Jun;51(3):1258-1270. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3.
6
The adaptation of the Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW) for Italian.情感词效价评定量表(ANEW)的意大利语适应性研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Sep;46(3):887-903. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0405-3.
7
Spanish norms for affective and lexico-semantic variables for 1,400 words.针对1400个单词的情感和词汇语义变量的西班牙语规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Dec;48(4):1358-1369. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0684-y.
8
Affective norms for 380 Spanish words belonging to three different semantic categories.属于三个不同语义范畴的 380 个西班牙语单词的情感规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Jun;44(2):395-403. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0165-x.
9
Examining assortativity in the mental lexicon: Evidence from word associations.审视心理词库中的搭配性:来自词语联想的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1717-24. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0832-5.
10
The Nature of Word Associations in Sentence Contexts.句子语境中的词汇联想的本质。
Exp Psychol. 2022 Mar;69(2):104-110. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000547. Epub 2022 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Valence as principal dimension of the semantic space in primary progressive aphasia semantic variant.效价作为原发性进行性失语语义变异型语义空间的主要维度。
Brain Commun. 2025 Jul 23;7(4):fcaf281. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf281. eCollection 2025.
2
A large-scale database of Mandarin Chinese word associations from the Small World of Words Project.一个来自“词汇小世界”项目的大规模汉语词语联想数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 30;57(1):34. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02513-1.
3
Navigating the Mental Lexicon: Network Structures, Lexical Search and Lexical Retrieval.
心理词汇的探索:网络结构、词汇搜索和词汇检索。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2024 Mar 1;53(2):21. doi: 10.1007/s10936-024-10059-8.
4
The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Extrapolating affective values for 38,000+ Chinese words via a computational model.善、恶与矛盾情感:通过计算模型推断38000多个中文词汇的情感价值。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):5386-5405. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02274-3. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
5
Independency of Coding for Affective Similarities and for Word Co-occurrences in Temporal Perisylvian Neocortex.颞叶周围新皮质中情感相似性编码与词共现编码的独立性。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2023 Apr 11;4(2):257-279. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00095. eCollection 2023.
6
Cognitive networks detect structural patterns and emotional complexity in suicide notes.认知网络可检测自杀遗书的结构模式和情感复杂性。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 8;13:917630. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.917630. eCollection 2022.
7
The Nature of Word Associations in Sentence Contexts.句子语境中的词汇联想的本质。
Exp Psychol. 2022 Mar;69(2):104-110. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000547. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
8
Orienting to different dimensions of word meaning alters the representation of word meaning in early processing regions.从不同维度理解词义会改变早期加工区域中词义的表示方式。
Cereb Cortex. 2022 Jul 21;32(15):3302-3317. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab416.
9
Emotion norms for 6000 Polish word meanings with a direct mapping to the Polish wordnet.波兰语词汇 6000 个意义的情感规范,与波兰词网直接对应。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Oct;54(5):2146-2161. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01697-0. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
10
No Self Without Salience: Affective and Self-relevance Ratings of 552 Emotionally Valenced and Neutral Dutch Words.无我则无突显:552 个具有情感色彩和中性的荷兰词语的情感和自我相关性评定。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2022 Feb;51(1):17-32. doi: 10.1007/s10936-021-09784-1. Epub 2021 Jun 14.