Bradbury Stacey L, Davis Alan K, Leith Jaclyn, Hinman Nova, Ashrafioun Lisham, Burmeister Jacob M, Dworsky Dryw
a Department of Psychology , Bowling Green State University , Bowling Green , Ohio , USA.
J Homosex. 2016 Jun;63(6):808-20. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1112581. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
We evaluated the acceptability and justness of anti-lesbian and gay victimization among 473 undergraduates. Participants were assigned to one of four vignette conditions that described an individual being verbally victimized in a typical college setting. Each vignette varied by victim gender (male; female) and sexual orientation (lesbian/gay; heterosexual). Participants completed background questionnaires and a measure that assessed the acceptability of the actions described in the vignettes. Overall, victimization was rated as unacceptable regardless of the sexual orientation and gender of the victim. However, participants rated the victimization of lesbian and gay students as more harmful and unjust than victimization of heterosexual students. Although the acceptability of anti-lesbian and gay victimization was low, 3%-12% of participants rated anti-lesbian and gay victimization as slightly or completely acceptable and just. Given that victimization is associated with long-term negative outcomes, college administrators should consider interventions aimed at decreasing the acceptability of victimization among students.
我们评估了473名本科生中针对女同性恋者和男同性恋者的受害行为的可接受性和公正性。参与者被分配到四种情景条件之一,这些情景描述了一个人在典型的大学环境中遭受言语攻击。每个情景因受害者性别(男;女)和性取向(女同性恋者/男同性恋者;异性恋者)而有所不同。参与者完成了背景调查问卷以及一项评估情景中所描述行为的可接受性的测评。总体而言,无论受害者的性取向和性别如何,受害行为都被评为不可接受。然而,参与者认为女同性恋和男同性恋学生遭受的伤害比异性恋学生遭受的伤害更大且更不公正。尽管针对女同性恋者和男同性恋者的受害行为的可接受性较低,但3%-12%的参与者认为针对女同性恋者和男同性恋者的受害行为略有或完全可以接受且公正。鉴于受害行为与长期负面结果相关,大学管理人员应考虑采取干预措施,以降低学生中对受害行为的可接受性。