Kilianski Andy, Evans Nicholas G
BioDefense Branch, BioSciences Division, Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, United States of America.
Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
PLoS Pathog. 2015 Oct 29;11(10):e1005097. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005097. eCollection 2015 Oct.
The current Ebola virus outbreak has highlighted the uncertainties surrounding many aspects of Ebola virus virology, including routes of transmission. The scientific community played a leading role during the outbreak-potentially, the largest of its kind-as many of the questions surrounding ebolaviruses have only been interrogated in the laboratory. Scientists provided an invaluable resource for clinicians, public health officials, policy makers, and the lay public in understanding the progress of Ebola virus disease and the continuing outbreak. Not all of the scientific communication, however, was accurate or effective. There were multiple instances of published articles during the height of the outbreak containing potentially misleading scientific language that spurred media overreaction and potentially jeopardized preparedness and policy decisions at critical points. Here, we use articles declaring the potential for airborne transmission of Ebola virus as a case study in the inaccurate reporting of basic science, and we provide recommendations for improving the communication about unknown aspects of disease during public health crises.
当前的埃博拉病毒疫情凸显了埃博拉病毒病毒学诸多方面的不确定性,包括传播途径。在这场可能是此类疫情中规模最大的疫情爆发期间,科学界发挥了主导作用,因为围绕埃博拉病毒的许多问题此前仅在实验室中进行过研究。科学家为临床医生、公共卫生官员、政策制定者和普通公众提供了宝贵资源,以了解埃博拉病毒病的进展和持续爆发情况。然而,并非所有的科学传播都是准确有效的。在疫情高峰期,有多篇发表的文章使用了可能具有误导性的科学语言,引发了媒体的过度反应,并可能在关键时刻危及防备和政策决策。在此,我们以宣称埃博拉病毒存在空气传播可能性的文章为例,探讨基础科学报道不准确的问题,并就改善公共卫生危机期间关于疾病未知方面的沟通提出建议。