Gold Melanie A, Tzilos Golfo K, Stein L A R, Anderson Bradley J, Stein Michael D, Ryan Christopher M, Zuckoff Allan, DiClemente Carlo
Columbia University Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Child and Adolescent Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Department of Population and Family Health, and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016 Feb;29(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
To examine a computer-assisted, counselor-guided motivational intervention (CAMI) aimed at reducing the risk of unprotected sexual intercourse. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We conducted a 9-month, longitudinal randomized controlled trial with a multisite recruitment strategy including clinic, university, and social referrals, and compared the CAMI with didactic educational counseling in 572 female adolescents with a mean age of 17 years (SD = 2.2 years; range = 13-21 years; 59% African American) who were at risk for pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. The primary outcome was the acceptability of the CAMI according to self-reported rating scales. The secondary outcome was the reduction of pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease risk using a 9-month, self-report timeline follow-back calendar of unprotected sex.
The CAMI was rated easy to use. Compared with the didactic educational counseling, there was a significant effect of the intervention which suggested that the CAMI helped reduce unprotected sex among participants who completed the study. However, because of the high attrition rate, the intent to treat analysis did not demonstrate a significant effect of the CAMI on reducing the rate of unprotected sex.
Among those who completed the intervention, the CAMI reduced unprotected sex among an at-risk, predominantly minority sample of female adolescents. Modification of the CAMI to address methodological issues that contributed to a high drop-out rate are needed to make the intervention more acceptable and feasible for use among sexually active predominantly minority, at-risk, female adolescents.
考察一种旨在降低无保护性行为风险的计算机辅助、咨询师指导的动机干预措施(CAMI)。
设计、地点、参与者、干预措施及主要结局指标:我们进行了一项为期9个月的纵向随机对照试验,采用多地点招募策略,包括诊所、大学和社会推荐,并将CAMI与说教式教育咨询进行比较,研究对象为572名平均年龄17岁(标准差=2.2岁;范围=13 - 21岁;59%为非裔美国人)的有怀孕和性传播疾病风险的女性青少年。主要结局是根据自我报告评分量表得出的CAMI的可接受性。次要结局是使用9个月的无保护性行为自我报告时间线回溯日历来降低怀孕和性传播疾病风险。
CAMI被评为易于使用。与说教式教育咨询相比,干预有显著效果,这表明CAMI有助于减少完成研究的参与者中的无保护性行为。然而,由于高失访率,意向性分析未显示CAMI对降低无保护性行为发生率有显著效果。
在完成干预的人群中,CAMI降低了有风险的、以少数族裔为主的女性青少年样本中的无保护性行为。需要对CAMI进行修改以解决导致高辍学率的方法学问题,以使该干预措施在性活跃的、以少数族裔为主的、有风险的女性青少年中更易于接受和可行。