• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险受益人群中颈动脉支架置入术后医生及医院手术量与死亡率的关系

Relationship Between Physician and Hospital Procedure Volume and Mortality After Carotid Artery Stenting Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

作者信息

Jalbert Jessica J, Gerhard-Herman Marie D, Nguyen Louis L, Jaff Michael R, Kumamaru Hiraku, Williams Lauren A, Chen Chih-Ying, Liu Jun, Seeger John D, Rothman Andrew T, Schneider Peter, Brott Thomas G, Tsai Thomas T, Aronow Herbert D, Johnston Joseph A, Setoguchi Soko

机构信息

From the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics (J.J.J., H.K., L.A.W., C.-Y.C., J.L., J.D.S., A.T.R., S.S.), Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (M.D.G.-H.), and Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (L.L.N.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Division of Consulting and Analytics, LASER Analytica, New York, NY (J.J.J.); Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (M.R.J.); Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Medical Centre, Honolulu, HI (P.S.); Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL (T.G.B.); Division of Cardiology, Denver VA Medical Center, University of Colorado (T.T.T.); Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, St Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI (H.D.A.); Global Health Outcomes, Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company Indianapolis, IN (J.A.J.); and Department of Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (S.S.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Oct;8(6 Suppl 3):S81-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001668.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001668
PMID:26515214
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials demonstrated the efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS) relative to carotid endarterectomy when performed by physicians with demonstrated proficiency. It is unclear how CAS performance may be influenced by the diversity in CAS and non-CAS provider volumes in routine clinical practice.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We linked Medicare claims to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' CAS Database (2005-2009). We assessed the association between 30-day mortality and past-year physician (0, 1-4, 5-9, 10-19, ≥20) and hospital (<10, 10-19, 20-39, ≥40) CAS volumes and past-year hospital coronary and peripheral stenting volumes (<200, 200-399, 400-849, ≥850) among beneficiaries at least 66 years of age. Unadjusted 30-day mortality risk was 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-2.0) for 19 724 patients undergoing CAS by 2045 physicians in 729 hospitals. Median past-year CAS volume was 9 (interquartile range, 4-19) for physicians and 23 (interquartile range, 12-41) for hospitals. Compared to physicians performing ≥20 CAS in the past year, lower CAS volumes were associated with higher adjusted risks of 30-day morality (P value for trend < 0.05): 1.4 (95% CI, 0.9-2.3) for 0 past-year CAS, 1.3 (95% CI, 0.9-1.8) for 1 to 4, 1.1 (95% CI, 0.8-1.6) for 5 to 9, and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.7-1.4) for 10 to 19. An inverse relationship between 30-day mortality and past-year CAS hospital volume as well as past-year hospital non-CAS volume, past-year hospital non-CAS volume, and 30-day mortality was also noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Among Medicare patients, an inverse relationship exists between physician and hospital CAS volumes and hospital non-CAS stenting volume and 30-day mortality, even after adjusting for all pertinent patient- and hospital-level factors.

摘要

背景

临床试验表明,由熟练掌握该技术的医生进行颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)时,其疗效相对于颈动脉内膜切除术更具优势。目前尚不清楚在常规临床实践中,CAS和非CAS医疗服务提供者数量的差异会如何影响CAS的实施效果。

方法与结果

我们将医疗保险理赔数据与医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的CAS数据库(2005 - 2009年)进行了关联。我们评估了729家医院中2045名医生为19724例至少66岁的受益人实施CAS后,30天死亡率与医生过去一年的CAS手术量(0、1 - 4、5 - 9、10 - 19、≥20例)、医院过去一年的CAS手术量(<10、10 - 19、20 - 39、≥40例)以及医院过去一年的冠状动脉和外周支架置入手术量(<200、200 - 399、400 - 849、≥850例)之间的关联。19724例接受CAS手术的患者,其未调整的30天死亡风险为1.8%(95%置信区间[CI],1.6 - 2.0)。医生过去一年的CAS手术量中位数为9例(四分位间距,4 - 19例),医院过去一年的CAS手术量中位数为23例(四分位间距,12 - 41例)。与过去一年实施≥20例CAS手术的医生相比,较低的CAS手术量与30天死亡调整风险较高相关(趋势P值<0.05):过去一年CAS手术量为0例时,风险为1.4(95%CI,0.9 - 2.3);1 - 4例时,风险为1.3(95%CI,0.9 - 1.8);5 - 9例时,风险为1.1(95%CI,0.8 - 1.6);10 - 19例时,风险为0.9(95%CI,0.7 - 1.4)。还注意到30天死亡率与医院过去一年的CAS手术量以及医院过去一年的非CAS手术量之间呈负相关。

结论

在医疗保险患者中,即使在对所有相关患者和医院层面因素进行调整后,医生和医院的CAS手术量、医院非CAS支架置入手术量与30天死亡率之间仍存在负相关。

相似文献

1
Relationship Between Physician and Hospital Procedure Volume and Mortality After Carotid Artery Stenting Among Medicare Beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人群中颈动脉支架置入术后医生及医院手术量与死亡率的关系
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Oct;8(6 Suppl 3):S81-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001668.
2
Surgeon case volume and 30-day mortality after carotid endarterectomy among contemporary medicare beneficiaries: before and after national coverage determination for carotid artery stenting.当代医疗保险受益人群中颈动脉内膜切除术后外科医生的手术量与30天死亡率:在国家确定颈动脉支架置入术覆盖范围之前和之后
Stroke. 2015 May;46(5):1288-94. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006276. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
3
Outcomes after carotid artery stenting in Medicare beneficiaries, 2005 to 2009.2005 年至 2009 年 Medicare 受益人的颈动脉支架置入术治疗结果。
JAMA Neurol. 2015 Mar;72(3):276-86. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.3638.
4
Analysis of Florida and New York state hospital discharges suggests that carotid stenting in symptomatic women is associated with significant increase in mortality and perioperative morbidity compared with carotid endarterectomy.对佛罗里达州和纽约州医院出院患者的分析表明,与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,症状性女性颈动脉支架置入术与死亡率和围手术期发病率显著增加相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Aug;56(2):334-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.01.066. Epub 2012 May 12.
5
Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in the US Medicare Population, 1999-2014.1999 - 2014年美国医疗保险人群中的颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术
JAMA. 2017 Sep 19;318(11):1035-1046. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.12882.
6
Readmissions after carotid artery revascularization in the Medicare population.医疗保险人群中颈动脉血管重建术后的再入院情况。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Apr 14;65(14):1398-408. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.01.048.
7
The Association of Publication of Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services Guidelines for Carotid Artery Angioplasty and Stenting (CAS) and CREST Results on the Utilization of CAS in Carotid Revascularization.医疗补助与医疗照顾服务中心颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术(CAS)指南的发布协会以及CREST关于CAS在颈动脉血运重建中应用结果的报告。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Nov;29(8):1606-13. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.06.091. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
8
Carotid endarterectomy was performed with lower stroke and death rates than carotid artery stenting in the United States in 2003 and 2004.2003年和2004年在美国,颈动脉内膜切除术的实施带来的中风和死亡率低于颈动脉支架置入术。
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Dec;46(6):1112-1118. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.08.030.
9
Risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy: results from the SVS Vascular Registry.颈动脉支架置入术和动脉内膜切除术的风险调整后30天结局:来自血管外科学会(SVS)血管登记处的结果
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jan;49(1):71-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.039. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
10
Operator experience and carotid stenting outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人的术者经验与颈动脉支架置入术结局。
JAMA. 2011 Sep 28;306(12):1338-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1357.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of High-Performance Low-Volume Hospitals in Acute Stroke Care.急性卒中护理中高性能低容量医院的特征
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Apr 15;14(8):e038348. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038348. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
2
Characteristics of Mortality After Endovascular Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中患者血管内血栓切除术术后的死亡特征
Clin Interv Aging. 2024 Dec 17;19:2145-2155. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S496733. eCollection 2024.
3
Carotid artery stenting for asymptomatic stenosis is associated with decreased 30-day readmission at very high volume centers.
颈动脉支架置入术治疗无症状狭窄与高容量中心 30 天再入院率降低相关。
J Clin Neurosci. 2023 Aug;114:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2023.05.024. Epub 2023 Jun 3.
4
Supply and Distribution of Vascular Access Physicians in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Study.美国血管通路医师的供应和分布:一项横断面研究。
Kidney360. 2020 Aug;1(8):763-771. doi: 10.34067/kid.0002722020. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
5
The Potential Impact of "Take the Volume Pledge" on Outcomes After Carotid Artery Stenting.“控制容量承诺”对颈动脉支架置入术后结局的潜在影响。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Feb 1;86(2):241-249. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz053.
6
Stroke Issue 2015.《中风》2015年第2期
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Oct;8(6 Suppl 3):S65. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002345.