Pinzon-Rondon Angela Maria, Attaran Amir, Botero Juan Carlos, Ruiz-Sternberg Angela Maria
Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.
Faculties of Law and Medicine, Canada Research Chair in Law, Population Health and Global Development Policy, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 29;5(10):e007004. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007004.
To explore whether the rule of law is a foundational determinant of health that underlies other socioeconomic, political and cultural factors that have been associated with health outcomes.
Global project.
Data set of 96 countries, comprising 91% of the global population.
The following health indicators, infant mortality rate, maternal mortality rate, life expectancy, and cardiovascular disease and diabetes mortality rate, were included to explore their association with the rule of law. We used a novel Rule of Law Index, gathered from survey sources, in a cross-sectional and ecological design. The Index is based on eight subindices: (1) Constraints on Government Powers; (2) Absence of Corruption; (3) Order and Security; (4) Fundamental Rights; (5) Open Government; (6) Regulatory Enforcement, (7) Civil Justice; and (8) Criminal Justice.
The rule of law showed an independent association with infant mortality rate, maternal mortality rate, life expectancy, and cardiovascular disease and diabetes mortality rate, after adjusting for the countries' level of per capita income, their expenditures in health, their level of political and civil freedom, their Gini measure of inequality and women's status (p<0.05). Rule of law remained significant in all the multivariate models, and the following adjustment for potential confounders remained robust for at least one or more of the health outcomes across all eight subindices of the rule of law. Findings show that the higher the country's level of adherence to the rule of law, the better the health of the population.
It is necessary to start considering the country's adherence to the rule of law as a foundational determinant of health. Health advocates should consider the improvement of rule of law as a tool to improve population health. Conversely, lack of progress in rule of law may constitute a structural barrier to health improvement.
探讨法治是否是健康的一个基本决定因素,它构成了其他与健康结果相关的社会经济、政治和文化因素的基础。
全球项目。
96个国家的数据集,占全球人口的91%。
纳入以下健康指标,即婴儿死亡率、孕产妇死亡率、预期寿命以及心血管疾病和糖尿病死亡率,以探讨它们与法治的关联。我们在横断面和生态设计中使用了一个从调查来源收集的全新法治指数。该指数基于八个子指数:(1) 对政府权力的限制;(2) 不存在腐败;(3) 秩序与安全;(4) 基本权利;(5) 开放政府;(6) 监管执法;(7) 民事司法;以及(8) 刑事司法。
在调整了各国的人均收入水平、卫生支出、政治和公民自由水平、基尼不平等指数以及妇女地位后,法治与婴儿死亡率、孕产妇死亡率、预期寿命以及心血管疾病和糖尿病死亡率呈现独立关联(p<0.05)。在所有多变量模型中,法治仍然显著,并且针对潜在混杂因素的以下调整对于法治的所有八个子指数中的至少一个或多个健康结局而言仍然稳健。研究结果表明,一个国家对法治的遵守程度越高,其人口的健康状况就越好。
有必要开始将一个国家对法治的遵守视为健康的一个基本决定因素。健康倡导者应将改善法治视为改善人口健康的一种工具。相反,法治方面缺乏进展可能构成改善健康的结构性障碍。