• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估全球卫生伙伴关系中的健康数据安全风险:概念框架的制定

Assessing Health Data Security Risks in Global Health Partnerships: Development of a Conceptual Framework.

作者信息

Espinoza Juan, Sikder Abu Taher, Dickhoner James, Lee Thomas

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2021 Dec 8;5(12):e25833. doi: 10.2196/25833.

DOI:10.2196/25833
PMID:34889752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8701669/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health care databases contain a wealth of information that can be used to develop programs and mature health care systems. There is concern that the sensitive nature of health data (eg, ethnicity, reproductive health, sexually transmitted infections, and lifestyle information) can have significant impact on individuals if misused, particularly among vulnerable and marginalized populations. As academic institutions, nongovernmental organizations, and international agencies begin to collaborate with low- and middle-income countries to develop and deploy health information technology (HIT), it is important to understand the technical and practical security implications of these initiatives.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim is to develop a conceptual framework for risk stratification of global health data partnerships and HIT projects. In addition to identifying key conceptual domains, we map each domain to a variety of publicly available indices that could be used to inform a quantitative model.

METHODS

We conducted an overview of the literature to identify relevant publications, position statements, white papers, and reports. The research team reviewed all sources and used the framework method and conceptual framework analysis to name and categorize key concepts, integrate them into domains, and synthesize them into an overarching conceptual framework. Once key domains were identified, public international data sources were searched for relevant structured indices to generate quantitative counterparts.

RESULTS

We identified 5 key domains to inform our conceptual framework: State of HIT, Economics of Health Care, Demographics and Equity, Societal Freedom and Safety, and Partnership and Trust. Each of these domains was mapped to a number of structured indices.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a complex relationship among the legal, economic, and social domains of health care, which affects the state of HIT in low- and middle-income countries and associated data security risks. The strength of partnership and trust among collaborating organizations is an important moderating factor. Additional work is needed to formalize the assessment of partnership and trust and to develop a quantitative model of the conceptual framework that can help support organizational decision-making.

摘要

背景

医疗保健数据库包含大量信息,可用于开发项目和完善医疗保健系统。人们担心健康数据的敏感性质(如种族、生殖健康、性传播感染和生活方式信息)如果被滥用,可能会对个人产生重大影响,特别是在弱势群体和边缘化人群中。随着学术机构、非政府组织和国际机构开始与低收入和中等收入国家合作开发和部署卫生信息技术(HIT),了解这些举措在技术和实际层面的安全影响非常重要。

目的

我们的目标是为全球健康数据伙伴关系和HIT项目的风险分层制定一个概念框架。除了确定关键概念领域外,我们还将每个领域映射到各种可公开获取的指标,这些指标可用于构建定量模型。

方法

我们对文献进行了综述,以确定相关出版物、立场声明、白皮书和报告。研究团队审查了所有来源,并使用框架法和概念框架分析来命名和分类关键概念,将它们整合到各个领域,并综合成一个总体概念框架。一旦确定了关键领域,就会搜索公共国际数据源以获取相关的结构化指标,以生成定量对应指标。

结果

我们确定了5个关键领域来构建我们的概念框架:HIT状况、医疗保健经济学、人口统计学与公平性、社会自由与安全以及伙伴关系与信任。这些领域中的每一个都映射到了一些结构化指标。

结论

医疗保健的法律、经济和社会领域之间存在复杂的关系,这影响了低收入和中等收入国家的HIT状况以及相关的数据安全风险。合作组织之间伙伴关系和信任的强度是一个重要的调节因素。需要开展更多工作来规范对伙伴关系和信任的评估,并开发一个概念框架的定量模型,以帮助支持组织决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/293b/8701669/310c01158512/formative_v5i12e25833_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/293b/8701669/4ce3718dc95e/formative_v5i12e25833_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/293b/8701669/327ee68d3210/formative_v5i12e25833_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/293b/8701669/310c01158512/formative_v5i12e25833_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/293b/8701669/4ce3718dc95e/formative_v5i12e25833_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/293b/8701669/327ee68d3210/formative_v5i12e25833_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/293b/8701669/310c01158512/formative_v5i12e25833_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing Health Data Security Risks in Global Health Partnerships: Development of a Conceptual Framework.评估全球卫生伙伴关系中的健康数据安全风险:概念框架的制定
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Dec 8;5(12):e25833. doi: 10.2196/25833.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Tuberculosis结核病
4
A conceptual framework for analysing partnership and synergy in a global health alliance: case of the UK Public Health Rapid Support Team.用于分析全球卫生联盟伙伴关系和协同作用的概念框架:以英国公共卫生快速支援小组为例。
Health Policy Plan. 2022 Mar 4;37(3):322-336. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab150.
5
Evaluating Global Health Partnerships: A Case Study of a Gavi HPV Vaccine Application Process in Uganda.评估全球卫生伙伴关系:以加维 HPV 疫苗在乌干达的申请流程为例。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Jun 1;6(6):327-338. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.137.
6
Proceedings for the 5th Asia-Pacific Conference on Disaster Medicine: creating an agenda for action.第五届亚太灾害医学会议议程:制定行动议程
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2001 Jan-Mar;16(1):18-21. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00025498.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Public health and health promotion capacity at national and regional level: a review of conceptual frameworks.国家和区域层面的公共卫生与健康促进能力:概念框架综述
J Public Health Res. 2014 Apr 24;3(1):199. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2014.199. eCollection 2014 Mar 26.
9
Informative value of Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) in Health Technology Assessment (HTA).患者报告结局(PRO)在卫生技术评估(HTA)中的信息价值。
GMS Health Technol Assess. 2011 Feb 2;7:Doc01. doi: 10.3205/hta000092.
10
Security and privacy requirements for a multi-institutional cancer research data grid: an interview-based study.多机构癌症研究数据网格的安全与隐私要求:一项基于访谈的研究
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Jun 15;9:31. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-31.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining inclusivity: the use of AI and diverse populations in health and social care: a systematic review.审视包容性:人工智能在健康与社会护理中的应用及不同人群:一项系统综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Feb 5;25(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02884-1.
2
Managing Patients With COVID-19 in Armenia Using a Remote Monitoring System: Descriptive Study.使用远程监测系统管理亚美尼亚的 COVID-19 患者:描述性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Sep 30;10:e57703. doi: 10.2196/57703.
3
International Collaboration to Develop a Remote Monitoring Web App for COVID-19 Patients in Armenia: Design and Development With Agile Methodology.

本文引用的文献

1
What makes global healthcare partnerships successful? A systematic review.是什么让全球医疗保健伙伴关系取得成功?一项系统综述。
Glob Public Health. 2022 May;17(5):662-671. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1892795. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
2
Reconsidering reviews: the role of scoping reviews in digital medicine and pediatrics.重新审视综述:范围综述在数字医学和儿科学中的作用
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Dec 10;3(1):158. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00368-2.
3
Systemic racism, chronic health inequities, and COVID-19: A syndemic in the making?系统性种族主义、长期健康不平等与新冠疫情:一种正在形成的综合征候群?
亚美尼亚开发用于新冠肺炎患者的远程监测网络应用程序的国际合作:采用敏捷方法进行设计与开发
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Nov 25;9(4):e40110. doi: 10.2196/40110.
Am J Hum Biol. 2020 Sep;32(5):e23482. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23482. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
4
Maturity assessment and maturity models in health care: A multivocal literature review.医疗保健中的成熟度评估与成熟度模型:一项多视角文献综述
Digit Health. 2020 Apr 1;6:2055207620914772. doi: 10.1177/2055207620914772. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
5
Healthcare Data Breaches: Insights and Implications.医疗保健数据泄露:见解与影响
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 May 13;8(2):133. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8020133.
6
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations.剖析用于管理人群健康的算法中的种族偏见。
Science. 2019 Oct 25;366(6464):447-453. doi: 10.1126/science.aax2342.
7
The relationships between democratic experience, adult health, and cause-specific mortality in 170 countries between 1980 and 2016: an observational analysis.1980 年至 2016 年期间 170 个国家的民主经验、成年人健康与特定病因死亡率之间的关系:一项观察性分析。
Lancet. 2019 Apr 20;393(10181):1628-1640. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30235-1. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
8
What Makes International Global Health University Partnerships Higher-Value? An Examination of Partnership Types and Activities Favoured at Four East African Universities.是什么让国际全球健康大学伙伴关系更具价值?对东非四所大学偏好的伙伴关系类型和活动的考察。
Ann Glob Health. 2018 Apr 30;84(1):139-150. doi: 10.29024/aogh.20.
9
The evolving Semashko model of primary health care: the case of the Russian Federation.初级卫生保健不断发展的谢马什科模式:以俄罗斯联邦为例。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2018 Nov 2;11:209-220. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S168399. eCollection 2018.
10
Mortality due to low-quality health systems in the universal health coverage era: a systematic analysis of amenable deaths in 137 countries.全民健康覆盖时代低质量卫生系统导致的死亡:137 个国家可避免死亡的系统分析。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 17;392(10160):2203-2212. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31668-4. Epub 2018 Sep 5.