• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卓越质量改进报告标准2.0:来自详细共识过程的修订版出版指南。

Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence 2.0: revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.

作者信息

Ogrinc Greg, Davies Louise, Goodman Daisy, Batalden Paul, Davidoff Frank, Stevens David

机构信息

VA Outcomes Group, White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire.

VA Outcomes Group, White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2016 Feb;200(2):676-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.09.015. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2015.09.015
PMID:26515734
Abstract

Since the publication of Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 1.0) guidelines in 2008, the science of the field has advanced considerably. In this article, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) semistructured interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) two face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts, and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasizes the reporting of three key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value, and safety of health care: the use of formal and informal theory in planning, implementing, and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done; and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve health care, recognizing that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (www.squire-statement.org).

摘要

自2008年《卓越质量改进报告标准》(SQUIRE 1.0)指南发布以来,该领域的科学有了长足发展。在本文中,我们描述了SQUIRE 2.0的制定过程及其关键组成部分。我们在2012年至2015年期间进行了修订,采用了以下方法:(1)通过半结构化访谈和焦点小组评估SQUIRE 1.0,并收集国际指导小组的反馈意见;(2)召开两次面对面的共识会议以制定中期草案;(3)与作者进行试点测试并开展公众意见征求期。SQUIRE 2.0强调报告为提高医疗保健质量、价值和安全性而进行的系统性努力的三个关键组成部分:在规划、实施和评估改进工作中使用正式和非正式理论;开展工作的背景;以及对干预措施的研究。SQUIRE 2.0旨在报告用于改善医疗保健的一系列方法,认识到这些方法可能复杂且具有多维度性。它为在学术文献(www.squire-statement.org)中分享这些发现提供了共同基础。

相似文献

1
Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence 2.0: revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.卓越质量改进报告标准2.0:来自详细共识过程的修订版出版指南。
J Surg Res. 2016 Feb;200(2):676-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.09.015. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
2
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines from a Detailed Consensus Process.SQUIRE 2.0(卓越质量改进报告标准):来自详细共识过程的修订版出版指南。
Perm J. 2015 Fall;19(4):65-70. doi: 10.7812/TPP/15-141.
3
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.SQUIRE 2.0(卓越质量改进报告标准):来自详细共识过程的修订版出版指南。
Am J Med Qual. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(6):543-9. doi: 10.1177/1062860615605176.
4
Squire 2.0 (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.Squire 2.0(卓越质量改进报告标准):通过详细的共识过程制定的修订版出版指南。
Am J Crit Care. 2015 Nov;24(6):466-73. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2015455.
5
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines From a Detailed Consensus Process.SQUIRE 2.0(卓越质量改进报告标准):详细共识过程产生的修订版出版指南
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2015 Nov;46(11):501-7. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20151020-02.
6
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.SQUIRE 2.0(报告质量改进卓越性的标准):经过详细共识过程修订的发布指南。
Can J Diabetes. 2015 Oct;39(5):434-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2015.08.001.
7
[SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process].[SQUIRE 2.0(卓越质量改进报告标准):来自详细共识过程的修订版发表指南]
Medwave. 2015 Nov 20;15(10):e6318. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2015.10.6318.
8
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.SQUIRE 2.0(卓越质量改进报告标准):通过详细的共识过程制定的修订版出版指南。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):986-992. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
9
The effect of the SQUIRE (Standards of QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines on reporting standards in the quality improvement literature: a before-and-after study.SQUIRE(卓越质量改进报告标准)指南对质量改进文献报告标准的影响:一项前后对照研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Jun;24(6):400-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003737. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
10
Explanation and elaboration of the SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) Guidelines, V.2.0: examples of SQUIRE elements in the healthcare improvement literature.《卓越质量改进报告标准》(SQUIRE)指南V.2.0的解释与阐述:医疗保健改进文献中SQUIRE要素示例
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):e7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004480. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Strengthening anal cancer prevention in Abuja, Nigeria: Identifying barriers and potential strategies to improve training.加强尼日利亚阿布贾的肛门癌预防:识别改善培训的障碍和潜在策略。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;5(7):e0004616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004616. eCollection 2025.
2
Racial Equity in Urine Drug Screening Policies in Labor and Delivery.分娩期间尿液药物筛查政策中的种族平等
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250908. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0908.
3
Impact of educational videos and user guide on indwelling pleural catheter caregiver training and unplanned healthcare encounters.
教育视频和用户指南对留置胸膜导管护理人员培训及非计划性医疗接触的影响。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Feb 17;14(1):e003108. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003108.
4
Understanding and measuring workplace violence in healthcare: a Canadian systematic framework to address a global healthcare phenomenon.理解和衡量医疗保健领域的工作场所暴力:一个应对全球医疗保健现象的加拿大系统框架。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 13;25(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01144-1.
5
Examining Virtual Delivery of Strength at Home for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration.审视在家中通过虚拟方式提供力量训练对亲密伴侣暴力施暴行为的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Nov 25;14(12):1127. doi: 10.3390/bs14121127.
6
A novel interventional pain simulation-based education curriculum: Implementation to enhance procedural training.一种基于介入性疼痛模拟的新型教育课程:为加强操作培训而实施。
Interv Pain Med. 2022 Dec 15;1(4):100167. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100167. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Cancer patient satisfaction regarding the quality of information received: psychometric validity of EORTC QLQ-INFO25.癌症患者对所接受信息质量的满意度:EORTC QLQ-INFO25 的心理测量学效度。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 May 3;77(1):e20230358. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0358. eCollection 2024.
8
Implementation of a geriatric care bundle for older adults with acute burns.老年急性烧伤患者老年关怀护理包的实施。
Burns. 2024 May;50(4):841-849. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.02.022. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
9
Increasing venous thromboembolism risk assessment through a whole hospital-based intervention: a pre-post service evaluation to demonstrate quality improvement.通过全院范围内的干预措施提高静脉血栓栓塞风险评估水平:一项前后对照的服务评估以证明质量改进。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 Mar 11;36(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae019.
10
Reactive Attachment Disorder and Its Relationship to Psychopathology: A Systematic Review.反应性依恋障碍及其与精神病理学的关系:一项系统综述。
Children (Basel). 2023 Dec 6;10(12):1892. doi: 10.3390/children10121892.