Altın Selçuk, Ozan Tunç, İlhan Selçuk, İlhan Nevin, Onur Rahmi
Department of Urology, Fırat University Faculty of Medicine, Elazığ, Turkey.
Department of Pharmacology, Fırat University Faculty of Medicine, Elazığ, Turkey.
Turk J Urol. 2015 Sep;41(3):125-31. doi: 10.5152/tud.2015.89656.
This study is a placebo-controlled comparison of the response to alfuzosin treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients with and without metabolic syndrome (MetS).
A total of 80 men with LUTS were included in the study. Patients had a maximum flow rate of <15 mL/sec, prostate volume of >20 mL, and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of >8. All eligible men (n=68) for evaluation were initially divided into two groups as MetS (n=34) and non-MetS (n=34) groups. Patients were further randomized to receive alfuzosin (10 mg/day) or placebo (n=17/group; a total of four groups). The outcome was measured at 12(th) week according to the changes from baseline in IPSS, quality of life (QoL) scores, maximum flow rate (Qmax), and postmictional residue.
Alfuzosin significantly improved LUTS in men with and without MetS compared with patients receiving placebo (p<0.05). Mean IPSS scores in treatment groups decreased significantly, whereas patients receiving placebo had no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). Similarly, alfuzosin treatment resulted in a significant increase in Qmax in patients with LUTS/benign prostatic enlargement when compared with patients in placebo group (p<0.05). Mean QoL scores measured by IPSS-QoL and QoL questionnaires also improved significantly in patients receiving alfuzosin for 3 months regardless of the presence of MetS (p<0.05).
Our results revealed that the presence of MetS in patients with LUTS did not impair the response to alfuzosin treatment.
本研究是一项安慰剂对照试验,比较有无代谢综合征(MetS)的患者接受阿夫唑嗪治疗下尿路症状(LUTS)的反应。
共有80名LUTS男性患者纳入本研究。患者的最大尿流率<15 mL/秒,前列腺体积>20 mL,国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)>8。所有符合评估条件的男性(n = 68)最初被分为MetS组(n = 34)和非MetS组(n = 34)。患者进一步随机分为接受阿夫唑嗪(10毫克/天)或安慰剂治疗(每组n = 17;共四组)。在第12周时,根据IPSS、生活质量(QoL)评分、最大尿流率(Qmax)和排尿后残余尿量相对于基线的变化来测量结果。
与接受安慰剂的患者相比,阿夫唑嗪显著改善了有或无MetS的男性患者的LUTS(p<0.05)。治疗组的平均IPSS评分显著降低,而接受安慰剂的患者则无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。同样,与安慰剂组患者相比,阿夫唑嗪治疗使LUTS/良性前列腺增生患者的Qmax显著增加(p<0.05)。无论是否存在MetS,接受阿夫唑嗪治疗3个月的患者通过IPSS-QoL和QoL问卷测量的平均QoL评分也显著改善(p<0.05)。
我们的结果显示,LUTS患者中MetS的存在并不影响对阿夫唑嗪治疗的反应。