• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

供体服务区市场竞争与器官获取组织的表现有关吗?

Is Donor Service Area Market Competition Associated With Organ Procurement Organization Performance?

机构信息

1Center for Surgery and Public Health at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. 2 Division of Transplant Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. 3 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 4Section of Transplant Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2016 Jun;100(6):1349-55. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000979.

DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000000979
PMID:26516674
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) are currently evaluated on donation rates and number of organs per donor. However, there is significant variability in market characteristics which affect transplant programs' donor organ acceptance practices and OPOs' ability to successfully place higher risk organs. The impact of transplant market characteristics on OPO performance metrics has not been evaluated.

METHODS

The OPO performance measures were correlated annually with the Herfindahl Hirschman Index, a standard measure of market competition for centers within the OPO donor service areas from 2003 to 2011.

RESULTS

More competitive donor service areas were associated with increased number of donors (P = 0.01) and eligible deaths (P < 0.001). Market competition was associated with increased use of high Donor Risk Index for kidney (P = 0.03) and liver (P = 0.01) allografts. The OPOs with increased competition in liver transplant also were noted to have a higher donor conversion rate (P < 0.001), more donors per million population (P < 0.001), and a higher utilization rate for liver allografts (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that proposals to increase district size to increase competition among transplant programs could result in improved organ utilization over time by incentivizing the use of marginal donor organs and increasing access to transplantation.

摘要

背景

器官获取组织(OPO)目前的评估标准是捐赠率和每位捐赠者的器官数量。然而,市场特征存在显著差异,这些差异会影响移植项目的供体器官接受实践和 OPO 成功放置高风险器官的能力。移植市场特征对 OPO 绩效指标的影响尚未得到评估。

方法

从 2003 年到 2011 年,每年将 OPO 绩效指标与赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数相关联,该指数是 OPO 供体服务区内中心市场竞争的标准衡量指标。

结果

竞争更激烈的供体服务区与更多的捐赠者(P = 0.01)和符合条件的死亡人数(P <0.001)相关。市场竞争与使用更高的肾脏(P = 0.03)和肝脏(P = 0.01)供体风险指数供体移植物的增加有关。在肝脏移植中竞争加剧的 OPO 还被发现具有更高的供体转化率(P <0.001)、每百万人口更多的捐赠者(P <0.001)和更高的肝脏移植物利用率(P = 0.007)。

结论

这些数据表明,增加地区规模以增加移植项目之间竞争的提议可能会随着时间的推移通过激励使用边缘供体器官和增加移植机会来提高器官利用率。

相似文献

1
Is Donor Service Area Market Competition Associated With Organ Procurement Organization Performance?供体服务区市场竞争与器官获取组织的表现有关吗?
Transplantation. 2016 Jun;100(6):1349-55. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000979.
2
Assessment of National Organ Donation Rates and Organ Procurement Organization Metrics.国家器官捐献率和器官获取组织指标评估。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Feb 1;156(2):173-180. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5395.
3
Temporal Analysis of Market Competition and Density in Renal Transplantation Volume and Outcome.肾移植数量与结果的市场竞争及密度的时间分析
Transplantation. 2016 Mar;100(3):670-7. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000851.
4
Organ Procurement Organization and transplant center effects on cadaver renal transplant outcomes.器官获取组织和移植中心对尸体肾移植结果的影响。
Clin Transpl. 1996:427-41.
5
Market competition influences renal transplantation risk and outcomes.市场竞争影响肾移植风险和结果。
Ann Surg. 2014 Sep;260(3):550-6; discussion 556-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000896.
6
Association Between Organ Procurement Organization Social Network Centrality and Kidney Discard and Transplant Outcomes.器官获取组织社交网络中心性与肾脏丢弃及移植结果之间的关联
Transplantation. 2015 Dec;99(12):2617-24. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000773.
7
The Canadian Organ Replacement Register.加拿大器官移植登记处。
Clin Transpl. 1996:91-107.
8
The consent process for cadaveric organ procurement: how does it work? How can it be improved?尸体器官获取的同意程序:它是如何运作的?如何加以改进?
JAMA. 2001 Jan 17;285(3):329-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.3.329.
9
Organ procurement organization (OPO), best practices.器官获取组织(OPO),最佳实践。
Clin Transplant. 2001;15 Suppl 6:16-21. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.2001.00003.x.
10
Examining utilization of kidneys as a function of procurement performance.考察肾脏利用情况与获取绩效之间的关系。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Jun;22(6):1614-1623. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16985. Epub 2022 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
US Population Size and Outcomes of Adults on Liver Transplant Waiting Lists.美国肝移植等待名单上成年人的人口规模及结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e251759. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1759.
2
Center expansion of liver transplants using donation after circulatory death organs is associated with reduced overall waitlist mortality.使用循环死亡器官进行肝移植的中心扩张与降低整体候补名单死亡率有关。
Clin Transplant. 2023 Jun;37(6):e14960. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14960. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
3
Textbook Outcome as a Quality Metric in Liver Transplantation.
教科书式结局作为肝移植中的一项质量指标
Transplant Direct. 2022 Apr 15;8(5):e1322. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001322. eCollection 2022 May.
4
Association of transplant center market concentration and local organ availability with deceased donor kidney utilization.移植中心市场集中程度和当地器官可获得性与已故供体肾脏利用的关联。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Jun;22(6):1603-1613. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17010. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
5
Examining utilization of kidneys as a function of procurement performance.考察肾脏利用情况与获取绩效之间的关系。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Jun;22(6):1614-1623. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16985. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
6
Defining Quality Criteria for Success in Organ Donation Programs: A Scoping Review.定义器官捐赠项目成功的质量标准:一项范围综述
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2021 Feb 20;8:2054358121992921. doi: 10.1177/2054358121992921. eCollection 2021.
7
Wide Variation in the Percentage of Donation After Circulatory Death Donors Across Donor Service Areas: A Potential Target for Improvement.不同地区器官捐献者来源的脑死亡供体比例差异较大:一个潜在的改进目标。
Transplantation. 2020 Aug;104(8):1668-1674. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003019.
8
Association of Kidney Transplant Center Volume With 3-Year Clinical Outcomes.移植中心容量与 3 年临床结果的相关性。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Oct;74(4):441-451. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.02.019. Epub 2019 May 7.