Reissig Paola, Puri Rohan, Garry Michael I, Summers Jeffery J, Hinder Mark R
Human Motor Control Laboratory, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia; Faculty of Health Graduate Research Program, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Human Motor Control Laboratory, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 30;10(10):e0141828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141828. eCollection 2015.
The well-documented observation of bilateral performance gains following unilateral motor training, a phenomenon known as cross-limb transfer, has important implications for rehabilitation. It has recently been shown that provision of a mirror image of the active hand during unilateral motor training has the capacity to enhance the efficacy of this phenomenon when compared to training without augmented visual feedback (i.e., watching the passive hand), possibly via action observation effects [1]. The current experiment was designed to confirm whether mirror-visual feedback (MVF) during motor training can indeed elicit greater performance gains in the untrained hand compared to more standard visual feedback (i.e., watching the active hand). Furthermore, discussing the mechanisms underlying any such MVF-induced behavioural effects, we suggest that action observation and the cross-activation hypothesis may both play important roles in eliciting cross-limb transfer. Eighty participants practiced a fast-as-possible two-ball rotation task with their dominant hand. During training, three different groups were provided with concurrent visual feedback of the active hand, inactive hand or a mirror image of the active hand with a fourth control group receiving no training. Pre- and post-training performance was measured in both hands. MVF did not increase the extent of training-induced performance changes in the untrained hand following unilateral training above and beyond those observed for other types of feedback. The data are consistent with the notion that cross-limb transfer, when combined with MVF, is mediated by cross-activation with action observation playing a less unique role than previously suggested. Further research is needed to replicate the current and previous studies to determine the clinical relevance and potential benefits of MVF for cases that, due to the severity of impairment, rely on unilateral training programmes of the unaffected limb to drive changes in the contralateral affected limb.
单侧运动训练后出现双侧运动能力提升这一有充分记录的现象,即所谓的交叉肢体转移,对康复具有重要意义。最近有研究表明,与无增强视觉反馈(即观察被动手)的训练相比,在单侧运动训练期间提供主动手的镜像能够增强这一现象的效果,这可能是通过动作观察效应实现的[1]。本实验旨在确认运动训练期间的镜像视觉反馈(MVF)与更标准的视觉反馈(即观察主动手)相比,是否确实能使未训练手获得更大的运动能力提升。此外,在讨论任何此类MVF诱发的行为效应背后的机制时,我们认为动作观察和交叉激活假说可能在引发交叉肢体转移中都发挥着重要作用。80名参与者用其优势手练习尽可能快速的双球旋转任务。在训练期间,三个不同的组分别获得主动手、非主动手的同步视觉反馈或主动手的镜像,第四个对照组不接受训练。训练前后均测量了双手的表现。与其他类型的反馈相比,MVF并没有使单侧训练后未训练手的训练诱发表现变化程度增加。数据与以下观点一致,即交叉肢体转移与MVF结合时,是由交叉激活介导的,动作观察所起的独特作用比之前认为的要小。需要进一步的研究来重复当前和之前的研究,以确定MVF对于因损伤严重程度而依赖未受影响肢体的单侧训练计划来驱动对侧受影响肢体变化的病例的临床相关性和潜在益处。